“highly significant”

However, there was a highly significant difference in the total scores according to the presence or absence of AOS (p < 0.001), and while the inter-rater reliability for some individual items was low, the inter-rater reliability for the total score was high at an excellent range.

For E P and E , one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( F = 40.59 and F = 19.13, respectively; both p < 0.001).

The McNemar’s test showed this change to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 2 ].

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was 1058.90 (df=231) and was highly significant (p<0.001), which indicates that the variables are correlated and, therefore, appropriate for PCA 29 .

Furthermore, the individual slopes relating autoMAPSE to MAP were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and markedly heterogeneous (both positive and negative), suggesting that ventriculoarterial coupling differs substantially in different individual patients.

Coexpression analysis revealed a highly significant overlap of IDO1 and PDCD1 in DCs ( P < 0.001; Figure 4D ) and macrophages ( P < 0.05; Figure 4D ), but not in monocytes, mast cells, and neutrophils (all P > 0.05; Figure 4D ).

Studies comparing the highest versus lowest quartiles of UPFs intake ( n = 3) ( 16 , 17 , 23 ) yielded a highly significant and consistent result (ES = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14–1.32, p < 0.001).

When we compared these two groups of patients, we found a highly significant difference between them at both the regions overlying the affected muscle groups (p<0.001; effect size>0.65) as given in Table 1 and Figure 1 .

This difference was highly significant (bootstrapping test confirming more similar fixation maps within than between fixation classes, p < .001).

However, PCT levels demonstrated a highly significant decrease over time ( p < 0.001).

We verified this by testing the overlap between the TF motif-gene cis -regulations inferred by MLC as applied to the LiCAT-seq human embryonic development dataset, 38 and the cis -regulations inferred by MethCorTarget applied to the DNAme human embryonic development dataset 39 : we found a highly significant overlap, odds ratio OR = 13.3 ( 12.9 − 13.8 ) ( p < 0.001 , Fisher’s exact test).

Likewise, highly significant differences were noted in the middle (F = 14.67, p < 0.001) and coronal thirds (F = 14.67, p < 0.001), suggesting that the type of irrigant significantly influenced smear layer removal (Table 2 ).

Management method significantly affected BD and SP ( p < 0.05) but not MC, while management duration exerted highly significant effects on all three parameters ( p < 0.001) ( Figure S1 and Table S1 ).

ΔR 2 ranged from 0.508 (for ITS) to 0.759 (for PU), with all F‐change statistics highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating these constructs explain an additional 50.8 to 75.9% of variance over and above controls.

The association between this variable and motivation levels was highly significant [ χ 2 (16) = 105.58, p < 0.001, Cramér’s V = 0.14], supporting the hypothesis that ‘higher usage frequency leads to stronger learning motivation’, which aligns with the theoretical connotations of the “Relevance” and “Satisfaction” dimensions in the ARCS model.

There was a highly significant correlation between RI values and the severity of the renal lesion as ranked by DMSA scintigraphy ( P < 0.001)[ 18 ].

1 and 2 ) Taking into consideration the precise localization of the recurrent plaque, 41/41(100%) specimens were unilateral (compared to 30/41 (73.2%) in pVFL; the difference is highly significant: G (1) = 17.0, p < 0.001), but in 2/41 (4.9%) patients, the lesions spread in the anterior commissure (compared to 16/25 (39.0%) in pVFL, the difference is highly significant: G (1) = 15.5, p < 0.001).

Four key genes ( ANXA1 , ICAM1 , PTEN , and THBS1 ) showed an highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant association was observed between pregnancy-risk status and teratogenic medication use (χ2(1)=12.89, p<0.001).

However, several of the between-group changes we observed in ratings of hunger were highly significant, with p-values < 0.001.

The Chi square test results show that the prevalence of WSLs in the test group compared to the control group is highly significant statistically ( P < 0.001).

Analysis of 10 variables (all parameters of Table 4 without homogeneity of component pixels) in multivariate test (Wilkś lambda) showed highly significant difference between the centroids (vector of means) of group of diabetic patients and controls (10 variables simultaneously) ( p <0.001).

The log-likelihood ratio test comparing the piecewise model to a standard linear model was highly significant ( P < 0.001), signifying the superior fit of the piecewise model to the data.

The statistical analysis also indicates that the difference in populations is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Authenticity of CoT responses by reasoning-capable LLMs For reasoning authenticity, the Kruskal-Wallis H test demonstrated highly significant differences in physician ratings among the four models ( p < 0.001).