“highly significant”

Correlation tests, seen in Table 3 , indicated a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between the breed and implementation of extended lactation.

There was a highly significant level of compatibility of children who had affectionate rather than aggressive cats ( p < 0.001).

Ether extract digestibility exhibited a more complex pattern, with no significant linear effect but a highly significant quadratic effect ( p < 0.001). 3.3.

At study week 12, compared with baseline, a highly significant decrease of 480.82 steps per day was observed among physically active participants ( Table 2 ; 95% CI −545.17 to −416.46, P <.001, Cohen f 2 =0.0073, P <.001).

Specifically, there were highly significant positive correlations between hypocotyl length and TPC as well as hypocotyl length and TIC ( p < 0.001), and a significant positive correlation was found between hypocotyl length and saponin content ( p < 0.05).

Concerning patients’ attitudes toward their psychiatric treatment, both in contrast to the level of adherence and in dichotomous adherence, a highly significant relationship ( p < .001) ( Table 3 ) was found such that, without doubt, the cases with higher adherence present higher scores on the Drug Attitudes Inventory (3.27 vs. 1.57; difference close to 2 points).

Regarding the values for the support needs and strategy indicators, the results showed highly significant correlations between support needs and each informer's assessment with regard to the strategies they received ( r = .90, p < .001 for the individuals with ID and the family members, and r = .85, p < .001 for the professionals).

Age was expectedly a highly significant risk factor for PD ( P < 0.001).

The addition of 100 and 500 ppm taurine had a highly significant ( p = 0.001) effect on the plasma antioxidant potential in chicks.

Differences were considered as non-significant (ns) when p > 0.05, significant (*) when p < 0.05, very significant (**) when p < 0.01, and highly significant (***) when p < 0.001.

The prognostic values, AUROC (mean; 95% CI) and Cox‐risk‐ratio (mean; 95% CI) of FibroTest for the prediction of 10 year‐liver‐related survivals in 1079 patients with NAFLD were highly significant ( P < 0.001) 0.941 (0.905‐0.978), 1224 (264‐5613), vs random.

From 2009 to 2010, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in the mean rate of hospitalizations for TB in the Centre and North subgroups vs. a significant ( P < 0.05) decrease in the East, South and South-West subgroups.

Results In this study; the diabetic group showed statistically highly significant decrease in the average RV-GLS (−14.0 ± 6.9 in group 1 vs. −22.7 ± 2.5 in group 2, P < 0.001), significant decrease in RV S velocity (9.5 ± 2.2 in group 1 vs. 11.5 ± 1.8 in group 2, P < 0.05), significantly reduced E/A ratio (1.0 ± 0.2 in group 1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1 in group 2, P < 0.05), and highly significant increased E/Em ratio (7.9 ± 3.2 in group 1 vs. 5.2 ± 0.7 in group 2, P < 0.001).

Glycolysis and the Pentose Phosphate Pathways Are Important for GCRV Replication As KEGG pathway enrichment of the glycolysis and pentose phosphate metabolism reached highly significant levels at both the protein and metabolic levels ( p < 0.001), we treated CIK cells with the glycolysis inhibitor 2-DG and the pentose phosphate pathway inhibitor DHEA, and then infected them with GCRV to observe the effect on GCRV replication.

Hazard ratios were highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating the risk of a severely dysplastic lesion developing carcinoma was 81.8 (95% CI 10.5, 635.9) times higher than for a non-dysplastic lesion (Table 4 ).

In addition, a highly significant negative correlation between wall thickness and ADC was observable in the ex vivo measurements (r = -0.615, p < 0.001).

A p -value of * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, ** p < 0.01 as highly significant, *** p < 0.001 (**** p < 0.0001) as extremely significant, and “ns” indicates no significant difference. 5.

Overall, this resulted in a highly significant difference in LTP in control mice (F 1,13 = 120.105; p < 0.001, repeated measures (RM)-ANOVA) underlining an essential function of AMPK in long-term synaptic plasticity.

Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences in the age of patients stratified according to the site of the tumour (F 3,1582 =6.7, p<0.001), and SNK range testing revealed this was due to the ‘Upper’ oesophagus group being significantly (p<0.05) different from all the other groups which were statistically indistinguishable—the identity difference is indicated in table 1 by the boxes around the median ages for each site group.

The Mann-Whitney test applied to compare the two groups produced a highly significant statistical difference (p-value < 0.001), suggesting that the proposed GO-evaluation framework is able to emphasize a significant improvement of performance of all the reliability indices in a network that is high quality and structurally resolved.

The LSD-Pla contrast GS beta map exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with the LSD-Pla contrast GBC map after GSR (r = 0.65, p<0.001), but a highly significant positive correlation before GSR (r = 0.66, p<0.001).

When the six datasets were combined (n = 1334) (Figure 7K ), the positive association between Ran and VEGFR2 mRNA levels was highly significant (Pearson’s correlation 0.67, P < 0.001 ).

TGF-β1 was statistically highly significant only when comparing stages F2 to F4 while FSP-1 when comparing stages F3 to F4 (p<0.001).

The value of the Student t test was highly significant in all three cases (p<0.001).

The correlation between buildup and mean performance on Digits 1 to 3 was indeed highly significant, r (14) = 0.79, p <.001.