“highly significant”

Analyses conducted on the 3rd and 5th harmonic components of the leakage current signal produced statistically highly significant results ( p < 0.001) across all fault scenarios.

Regensburg Friedman tests revealed highly significant decreases in both MDI (χ2(2) = 122.40–123.39, all p < 0.001) and HAMD scores (χ2(2) = 113.95–115.92, all p < 0.001) over the course of treatment across all imputations.

Group B exhibited highly significant and notable gains: quadriceps strength increased from 3.1±0.5 to 4.4±0.4 (p<0.001), hamstrings from 3.3±0.4 to 4.6±0.5 (p<0.001), and hip abductors from 3.2±0.5 to 4.4±0.4 (p<0.001).

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of stimulation frequency on the AP peak for both glutamatergic ( F (2, 42) = 30.40, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.59 ) and GABAergic neurons ( F (2, 42) = 49.25, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.70 ), demonstrating a frequency-dependent increase.

Fisher’s exact test demonstrated a highly significant association between the BRAF + TERT co-mutation and tumor radioiodine refractoriness ( p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis further validated these results, showing that the improvements in antioxidant activity for the active composite mats were all highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared to the control groups.

PHN) and time were found to exert highly significant main effects on PWT ( p < 0.001).

The paired t-test showed a highly significant difference (t = 13.27, p < 0.001), suggesting improved fine and gross motor coordination, bilateral integration, and overall motor control after the intervention.

The model created was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

After excluding outliers exceeding 3 standard deviations (14 T1DM samples with S1P > 2315.3 nmol/L and 9 HC samples with S1P > 761.8 nmol/L), the difference remained highly significant (606.7 ± 431.8 vs. 390.8 ± 160.5 nmol/L, P < 0.001; Table 3 ), confirming that the elevation was not driven by extreme values.

Quantitative analysis demonstrated a highly significant increase in EB extravasation in Venom group compared to Control, Eda, APS-L, and APS-H groups (all p < 0.001; Figure 2D ), corroborating the severe and widespread BBB dysfunction suggested by histology (edema and hemorrhage) and brain water content measurements.

For males, these contrasts were highly significant (western lowland > Virunga, p < 0.001; Bwindi > Virunga, p < 0.001), while for females only western gorilla females were significantly longer than Virunga females (western lowland > Virunga, p < 0.05). 4.5.

When the cross-modal attention mechanism was introduced on top of the S-I module, it showed highly significant (p < 0.001, between CNN and CNN + S-I-C module) accuracy, with very significant (p < 0.01) AUC and F-1 scores.

The t test results for extreme groups indicated that all three configurations achieved highly significant discrimination ( p < 0.001), with Groups C and B showing elevated t values, reflecting superior discriminatory effectiveness.

Analysis of Variance The combined analysis of variance revealed that the main effects of environments (E), genotypes (G), and GEI were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for agronomic and phenology traits across the test environments (Table 4 ).

This improvement was highly significant according to both the paired Student’s t -test ( p < 0.001) and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( p = 0.0078), indicating substantial recovery of hip mobility, pain relief, and restoration of daily activities.

However, a highly significant main effect was observed for the isolated factor “EI band” in both the VL (F(4,168) = 552.78; ηp 2 = 0.929; p < 0.001) and RF (F(4,168) = 562.80; ηp 2 = 0.931; p < 0.001).

The first two principal coordinate axes explained 41.6% of the total variance (PCoA1: 27.5%, PCoA2: 14.1%), and global PERMANOVA remained highly significant (F = 3.54, P = 0.001).

The ANOVA results indicated a highly significant effect of fortification percentage on all techno-functional properties ( P < 0.001).

After introducing mean-centered MT as a covariate, the main effect of Running Speed remained highly significant in both the anaerobic (F = 57.52, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.673) and aerobic (F = 46.01, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.622) models, with no significant univariate interaction effects involving MT or sex on the rate of decline.

Sarcopenia impact When analyzed as a dichotomous variable, sarcopenia emerged as a highly significant predictor of mortality in the overall cohort (log-rank test, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3 ).

A chi-square test indicated a highly significant association between phylogenetic groups and LPS core types [ χ 2(28)=4,338.3, P <0.001).

On Day 2, all compounds showed their largest deviations from healthy controls, with highly significant increases for all three markers (p < 0.001).

To verify that the differences between the four FSE criticality indices were substantively meaningful and not artefacts of small numerical variation, a Friedman test was conducted, yielding a highly significant result (χ2 (3) = 72.255, p < 0.001), confirming that respondents rated the four critical role constructs significantly differently overall as shown in Table 6 .

This concentration was highly significant and inconsistent with resource-proportional foraging (χ2 = 62.88, df = 3, p < 0.001; S3A Table ).