“highly significant”

Consequently, the difference in mean RFC values between high- and low-FE chickens is highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Wilks' Lambda tests were highly significant in all comparisons ( p < 0.001), confirming that both ZComplexity and ZConvex Hull Volume contributed meaningfully to group discrimination.

A chi-square test across all seven shot categories confirmed that these differences were highly significant (χ2(6) = 523.12, p < 0.001), with a Cramér’s V of 0.11 indicating a small but meaningful effect size.

The statistical analysis of each SI model included in this study was highly significant ( P <0.001) ( Table 1 ).

p < 0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference, p < 0.01 indicates a highly significant statistical difference, and p < 0.001 indicates an extremely significant statistical difference.

A highly significant negative correlation between FAST and SOFAS scores was found ( r = −0.723, p < 0.001).

In terms of brain structure, MTLA scores on both left and right sides increase as the group’s CDR value increases, and their positive correlation is highly significant ( p <0.001, both left and right).

In all original experiments, the weighted mean effects were positive and statistical testing across studies revealed a highly significant positive effect indicating higher iron levels in AD versus HC ( d * = 0.87, p < 0.001, Figure 2A , Table 2 ).

Specifically, in the Asudyn ® group, a statistically significant difference was observed between T0 and T1 ( p = 0.007), and a highly significant difference was found between T0 and T2 ( p < 0.001).

Additionally, a highly significant difference was found between solubility at pH 6.7 and pH 7.0 (p < 0.001).

Interestingly, for this group the ‘after-before’ difference in the VAS scores was highly significant ( P <0.001) and still remained significant ( P <0.05) even if the improvement was reduced to 20 mm.

Results Chi-square test revealed significant ( p = 0.001*) and highly significant ( p < 0.001**) differences in diagnostic accuracy regarding the categories “staging” and “grading” in all compared groups when using the diagnostic algorithms (Table 4 ).

The KMO value of 0.700 and the highly significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity ( χ 2 = 164.16, p < .001) confirmed the adequacy of the data for factor analysis.

Determinants of Orchard Meadow Loss Univariate correlation analyses between loss rates and our continuous explanatory variables revealed highly significant (p<0.001) positive relationships for perimeter-area ratio (r = 0.48) and change in settlement and traffic area (r = 0.40) (Figs 4 and 5 ).

The tests revealed highly significant differences for all three PGSs ( p < 0.001), indicating that these PGS effectively differentiate between individuals with and without the disorders.

showed that restoration of AV synchrony with atrial and AV sequential pacing resulted in a highly significant (p≤0.001) increase in systolic blood pressure, cardiac output and stroke volume. 57 In another study, Abraham et al. found that in two patients with clinical evidence of RV infarction, atrial and AV sequential pacing resulted in immediate and sustained improvement in systolic blood pressure and clinical indices of perfusion. 58 Although these two studies are small, the findings may show benefit in settings of acute decompensation of the RV by enhancing RV function and, in turn, cardiac output.

These differences were highly significant (p = 0.001) and suggest that expression of RPRM is lost in GC tissues.

Fisher’s exact test showed this was highly significant (HIgM12 vs control IgM, P < 0.001; HIgM12 vs PBS, P < 0.001; and control IgM vs PBS, P = 0.39): 84% of mice treated with HIgM12 showed a positive response (Additional file 2 : Figure S2).

The study found a highly significant 3-year overall survival (OS) advantage for the CRT arm (76% vs 46%, P<0.001).

For the language tasks, the Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test demonstrated a highly significant effect of group, F (2, 54) = 34.829, p < 0.001, and this was driven by all three groups being significantly different from one another: non-native signer < native signer, p = 0.029, non-native signer < hearing, p = 0.001, and native signer < hearing, p = 0.009.

The results showed that the observed zHR increases for subjectively defined togetherness (SRhigh) was highly significant ( p < 0.001), regardless of the Ncell threshold.

13 show varying success rates across different offset positions, Offsets y_n and z_p have perfect success rates (100%), resulting in highly significant differences from the overall mean success rate (94.2%, p < 0.001).

Crucially, the Condition × Time interaction was highly significant ( F = 19.024; p < 0.001), showing that the temporal change differed between the two groups.

The comparison of these aggregated inhibition zones using the Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference between the preparations (H(2) = 80.75, p < 0.001). i-PRF showed the highest mean ranks and thus had the strongest overall efficacy across all microorganisms, followed by PRP and PRF.

The chi-square test examining the relationship between surface category and non-compliance was highly significant (χ 2 = 729.6, p < 0.001), indicating that the probability of exceeding the threshold was highly dependent on the type of surface.