Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginal significance

3,114 sentences · 3,114 papers · 6,631 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = .0621.2× alphagold
A significant partial correlation was found in the left caudate ( R = −.65, p = .0061), as well as a marginal significance in the left putamen ( R = −.48, p = .062; Fig. 3 ). 4 Discussion In this study, we originally used the FOCA metric on resting‐state fMRI to spatiotemporally investigate the alterations of regional spontaneous activity in FLE patients.
marginal significanceP = 0.0621.2× alphagold
The meta-analysis of IPW-adjusted estimates confirmed the inverted U-shaped pattern, with 8 h sleep significantly associated with poorer cognition (β = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.03, P = 0.008), while 9 h and ≥ 10 h showed negative associations with marginal significance after FDR correction (both P = 0.062).
marginal significancep = 0.0621.2× alphagold
A positive correlation was found between the score for each dimension and the total DRRS score, while no significant difference was found between DRRS score (total score and score for each dimension) and the D score of implicit attitudes (only existed a marginal significance ( p = 0.062) between the compulsivity for drug use and D score of implicit attitudes).
marginal significancep = 0.06251.3× alphagold
However, several other indicators, such as the Acceptability Rating Scale (ARS) ( p = 0.0625, r = 1.0), the System Usability Scale (SUS) ( p = 0.0625, r = 1.0), and the psychosocial impact (PIADS), showed marginal significance ( p = 0.0625, r = 1.0) favoring the BCI-based approach.
marginal significancep = 0.06261.3× alphagold
The KEGG pathway for biosynthesis of secondary metabolites was upregulated with a high level of significance in the direct, high treatment ( Figures 5 , 7 , p < 0.001; Supplementary Figure 4 ) and was also upregulated with marginal significance in the direct, low treatment ( Supplementary Table 4 , p = 0.0626).
marginal significancep = 0.0631.3× alphagold
showed a trendp = 0.0631.3× alpha
Similarly, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) #9501 trial showed a trend toward improved OS rates, albeit with marginal significance (OS rate of 42% with adjuvant CRT, compared to 31% with RT alone, p = 0.063).
marginal significanceP =0.0631.3× alphagold
The overall CVAE in a group of female patients with breast cancer who had exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors was slightly higher than for those treated with anthracyclines, with marginal significance (35.9 versus 28.5 per 100 person‐years; P =0.063; Table 2 ); however, there was no statistical difference between these 2 groups in the competing risk analysis (Figure 2A ).
marginal significancep = 0.0631.3× alphagold
Moderating effects of genetic variants on stage of illness development for gene expression and protein levels As indicated in Table 2 , for log mRNA expression levels, there was marginal significance of an interaction between the BDNF genotype and illness development stage after adjustments ( p = 0.063).