“marginal significance”

Amongst amphipods that partially consumed larvae, number of partially consumed larvae increased with prey density with marginal significance (quasipoisson GLM n = 45, ф = 0.69, Deviance 1,43 = 2.55, p = 0.061) whilst proportional partial consumption significantly decreased with increasing prey density (quasibinomial GLM n = 45, ф = 0.59, Deviance 1,43 = 21.62, p < 0.001).

In the extensive-stage SCLC group (Additional file 1 : Table S1), there was a trend toward the differential use of PCI based on age, with marginal significance ( P = 0.061).

GTR demonstrated marginal significance in both PFS ( p = 0.061) and OS ( p = 0.066).

It did reduce from significance ( p =.007) to marginal significance ( p = .061) the tendency for walkable Daybreak students to achieve more MVPA on the walk to school.

cases showed marginal significance with cervical dysplasia ( Table S1 ; p = 0.061).

In these subsamples, incidence rates in control students exceeded those of intervention by 4–7% points (reaching significance for older students, p=0.026, marginal significance for students with migration background, p=0.061, and failing to reach significance for male students, p=0.225).

In cohort B, a trend toward differential survival in favor of hysterectomy was observed with marginal significance ( P = 0.061).

The h 2 SNP of the vitamin D concentration by continuity was 7.23%, with marginal significance ( P =0.0611) ( Supplemental Fig.

As shown in Figure 2 , the area below ROC curve of CHAID decision tree was larger than that of logistic regression analysis with marginal significance (0.722 vs. 0.656, P = 0.062), both of which were away from reference line.

After adjusting for covariates, the group × time interaction coefficient for outpatient clinic visits was 1.83 among all participants (marginal significance; p = 0.062) and 4.58 ( p < 0.01) among those with low income.

A significant partial correlation was found in the left caudate ( R = −.65, p = .0061), as well as a marginal significance in the left putamen ( R = −.48, p = .062; Fig. 3 ). 4 Discussion In this study, we originally used the FOCA metric on resting‐state fMRI to spatiotemporally investigate the alterations of regional spontaneous activity in FLE patients.

22.6, 10.0, 31.6; U = 72, P = 0.002) and, at marginal significance, in a comparison between pairs of queens from stock A and stock B that had mated each with exactly the same male (n = 11, Wilcoxon matched pairs test, T = 12, P = 0.062).

5 g), albeit with only marginal significance for this genetic background (Temperature, P = 0.062).

2A ), while weighted UniFrac-based beta diversity, which is a phylogenetic and quantitative index, showed marginal significance ( p = 0.062; Fig. 2B ).

The SUV mean of adenomas showed a positive correlation with nadir cortisol levels on the HD DST ( P = 0.014) and preoperative ACTH levels, with marginal significance ( P = 0.062).

Meanwhile, after further adjustment, stent thrombosis was associated with low BMI (BMI < 22 kg/m 2 ), comparing to the high BMI group (BMI ≥ 26 kg/m 2 ) at 12 month, that reached marginal significance (stent thrombosis, aHR 2.891 [0.949–8.812], P = 0.062 at 12 month, S2 Table ).

In the case of HPV-positive OPC, no tumor dimensional variables were risk factors for ECS, while the largest node size of LNM was selected for a multivariable model with a marginal significance ( p = 0.062).

Another SNP, rs2043534 in NPAS2 , had marginal significance (p-value = 0.062).

A positive correlation was found between the score for each dimension and the total DRRS score, while no significant difference was found between DRRS score (total score and score for each dimension) and the D score of implicit attitudes (only existed a marginal significance ( p = 0.062) between the compulsivity for drug use and D score of implicit attitudes).

In this case, however, values under absorptive state (24.67 ± 1.50) only showed marginal significance (Bonferroni post-hoc , p = 0.062) when compared to the control sample (26.73 ± 1.76).

Both Personal-Negative and Social-Negative scores decreased ( t =−2.47 and −2.37 respectively, both p s <.01), while the increase in Personal-Positive score had marginal significance ( t = 1.99, p =.062).

41%, p = 0.062 with a marginal significance) prior to CVD debut than to ED, as Table 2 shows.

The meta-analysis of IPW-adjusted estimates confirmed the inverted U-shaped pattern, with 8 h sleep significantly associated with poorer cognition (β = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.03, P = 0.008), while 9 h and ≥ 10 h showed negative associations with marginal significance after FDR correction (both P = 0.062).

Our results showed that IC significantly increased RRFS (97.1% vs 99.1%; p=0.041) and OS (79.9% vs 85.1%; p=0.052), while AC had a survival benefit on OS (77.6% vs 83.6%; p=0.039) and increased DFS (84.7% vs 79.1%; p=0.089) and LRFS with marginal significance (93.3% vs 90.2%; p=0.062).

A marginal significance was found between SL–SH ( Z =−1.87, p =.062) but no significant difference was found between QL–QH ( p >.05).