Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginal significance

5,070 sentences · 5,070 papers · 6,631 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = .071.4× alphagold
For leukemia, high ( M = −1.76, SD = 1.76) and low ( M = −1.45, SD = 2.17) risk stimuli differed only at a marginal significance level, t (36) = 1.87, p = .07, partial η 2 = 0.09, indicating however an opposite polarity as observed for HIV risk (see Figure 3B ).
Neural correlates of risk perception: HIV vs. leukemia.
Front Behav Neurosci · 2013 · PMC3832789
marginal significanceP = 0.071.4× alphagold
3.2 Laboratory experimental study: Mate choice In general, males had to increase the use of refuges at high temperatures (Tukey 34°C vs 38°C, P = 0.01; Table 4 , Fig 4 ), although with a high inter-individual variability (Male refuge use variance: 34°C = 11269, 36°C = 78654, 38°C = 107728), whereas females showed the same tendency but with only marginal significance (Tukey 34°C vs 38°C P = 0.07).
marginal significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
The results for the training cohort showed marginal significance for CCR7 (p = 0.07) and significance for SPP1 (p = 0.0033), while in the testing cohort, significance was observed for CCR7 (p = 0.035) and marginal significance for SPP1 (p = 0.073) ( Figure 6F ).
marginal significancep = 0.0701.4× alphagold
Although the relationship between wife’s hair length and husband-rated wife’s attractiveness showed marginal significance ( β = 0.11, SE = 0.06, 95% CI = [−0.014, 0.230], p = 0.070), the indirect effect remained significant. 1 On the other hand, the indirect pathway from husband’s hair length to sexual frequency via wife-rated husband’s attractiveness and wife’s sexual desire did not yield significance.
marginal significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
This resulted in a total of 73 “initial” memories being recalled and dated at later time points, on average 2.28 memories per child (16 by the youngest group, 26 by the middle group, and 31 by the oldest group, whereby the youngest group recalled fewer initial memories than did the two older groups at marginal significance, F (2,29) = 2.94, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.17).