Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginal significance

5,070 sentences · 5,070 papers · 6,631 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
This resulted in a total of 73 “initial” memories being recalled and dated at later time points, on average 2.28 memories per child (16 by the youngest group, 26 by the middle group, and 31 by the oldest group, whereby the youngest group recalled fewer initial memories than did the two older groups at marginal significance, F (2,29) = 2.94, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.17).
marginal significanceP = 0.071.4× alphagold
Similarly, cART had no effect on Category Fluency, Action Fluency, or Letter Fluency T-scores, and no effect on the overall verbal fluency composite T-scores, although marginal significance was observed for Letter Fluency and verbal fluency composite T-scores ( d : 0.20; 95% CI: −0.02, 0.43, P = 0.07 and d : 0.19; 95% CI: −0.03, 0.41, P = 0.09, respectively).
marginal significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
In contrast, an effect of the oddball type was significant in Experiment 3 [ F (1, 17) = 5.28, p = 0.03], presumably because of the higher error rates for responding to the random dots than the Gabor in the attend-vision condition [ t (17) = 2.05, p = 0.03], although an interaction just reached marginal significance [ F (1, 17) = 3.77, p = 0.07].
marginal significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
The results for the training cohort showed marginal significance for CCR7 (p = 0.07) and significance for SPP1 (p = 0.0033), while in the testing cohort, significance was observed for CCR7 (p = 0.035) and marginal significance for SPP1 (p = 0.073) ( Figure 6F ).
marginal significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
The β-diversity using the paired Bray–Curtis similarity index indicated marginal significance between those with high compared to low HOMA-IR ( p = 0.07) ( Figure 2 B). 3.4. α- and β-Diversity Analysis for Subgroups Stratified by HOMA-IR and Different Adiposity Indices The α-diversity was significant in the subgroup with high HOMA-IR and high WHR compared to the subgroup with low HOMA-IR and low WHR only ( p = 0.02) ( Figure 3 A).
marginal significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
Although the significance of higher chemotherapy response in pNET was lost when low-quality studies were excluded in a sensitivity analysis, the effect was still suggestive (OR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.19–1.07) and approaching the threshold for marginal significance ( p = 0.07) ( 6 ).