“marginal significance”

The ANOVA of Prime×Target×Group further showed a significant interaction among Prime, Target, and Group ( F (1,36) = 4.25, p <.05, partial η 2 = .11), but marginal significance for Target effect ( F (1,36) = 6.74, p <.08, partial η 2 = .09).

Among the control variables, professional title ( B = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p < 0.05) was positively related to communication efficacy, and age showed marginal significance ( B = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.08).

When stratified by cancer type, early-onset Hispanic/Latino patients with colon adenocarcinoma showed a trend toward marginal significance in WNT pathway alterations compared to early-onset NHW patients (93.3% vs. 69%, p = 0.08), suggesting potential ethnic-specific variations in this pathway for colon cancer ( Table S4 ).

For correct trials, the waveform in the time range of the Ne/ERN showed a more negative mean amplitude for the 133‐SMI condition ( M = 0.62 μV, SE = 0.18 μV) than for the 250‐SMI condition ( M = 1.09 μV, SE = 0.18 μV), which, however, reached only marginal significance, t (20) = 1.84, p = 0.080, d = 0.402.

Factors C and D showed marginal significance ( p = 0.08 and p = 0.06, respectively).

After including supplement intake, α-tocopherol and vitamin D intakes were lower in women with NVP than in those without it; this difference was with marginal significance ( P = 0·08).

Hypoxia preconditioning also suppressed COX-2 upregulation 6 h after hypoxia-ischemia injury in the HP + HI group (but this only reached marginal significance; P = 0.08).

We also found suggestive evidence for the association of genetically predicted sleep duration with early AMD, which showed a consistent direction of effect with a marginal significance (OR = 0.724, 95% CI = 0.503–1.041, P -value = 0.08).

The PAM50 panel was prognostic in the ERβ-positive subset with marginal significance (HR 2.47 [95% CI: 0.89-6.89], P = .080, Table 2 ), whereas the seven-gene panel significantly associated with DFS in ERβ-positive stage I cases (HR 2.44 [95% CI: 0.99-5.99], P = .050, Table 2 ).

Risk factors for revision and mechanical failure In univariate analysis, the use of ASR implant, small-sized head, advanced stage (3B or 4), lateral extension (type C2) of osteonecrosis, and large Kerboul angle were all identified as significant risk factors of revision for any reason (P < 0.05), while female sex reached marginal significance (P = 0.080) ( Table 5 ).

Only preoperative E/e' was associated with postoperative improvement or normalization of LVEF in these patients, with a marginal significance (AUC, 0.669; P =0.080).

Secondhand smoke exposure showed marginal significance with increased neighborhood traffic ( p = 0.08), and children with any household pet (dog and/or cat) were less likely to be exposed to neighborhood traffic ( p = 0.02) but after adjusting for demographics and family history of asthma this was no longer statistically significant.

Correlations between groups differed by marginal significance for the composite measure ( z = −1.73, p = 0.08) and reaction times ( z = −1.6, p = 0.09), indicating a different relationship between implicit and explicit emotion recognition performance in the NT as compared to the ASD group (see Figure 5 for group specific scatter plots of the composite measure correlation).

These factors identified by univariate analysis were then applied to multivariate analysis, and GRB7 expression level showed marginal significance (P = 0.08) for the prognosis of ESCC patients in multivariate analysis.

The age- and sex-adjusted OR reached the null value but remained 3.2 times higher (95% CI: 0.9–11.3) with marginal significance ( P = 0.08).

Univariate analysis found marginal significance for soft-tissue extension (p = 0.080) ( Table 5 ).

There was no significant difference in the univariate analysis except for anticoagulant use, which was shown to be associated with a higher risk of overall mortality with marginal significance (OR = 18.16, 95% CI, 0.69–479.41; P = .08).

Furthermore, the proportion of cases showing intrathoracic progression among all events at the first relapse was 83.0% (112/135) in the chemotherapy-alone group, 58.3% (14/24) in the TRT group, and 77.6% (38/49) in the ICI group; the proportion in the TRT group was significantly lower than that in the chemotherapy-alone group (p=0.006) and showed a marginal significance in comparison with that in the ICI group (p=0.08).

Sleep medicine showed marginal significance in telehealth patient-to-provider ratios ( P =.08) and significant changes in office visit patient-to-provider ratios ( P <.001).

We found increased CD73 levels associated with DMFS and OS, with marginal significance ( p = 0.08 and 0.13, respectively).

Quant industry interests negatively predict objective leadership performance with marginal significance ( b = −0.19, SE = 0.11, p = 0.080).

However, there was noticeable variability in the degree of plasma concentration changes for our study, indicated by a high standard deviation in the immediate post-exercise plasma OSM concentrations with only marginal significance ( p = 0.080).

This phenomenon was mirrored, albeit with marginal significance, by cirrhosis, which correlates positively with MO4 (OR = 3, p = 0.08) and negatively with MO1 (OR = 0.3, p = 0.08).

98.22, P = 0.011), and the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of the ciprofol group was significantly lower marginal significance lower than that of the propofol group (71.75 vs. 75.22, P = 0.08) after 3 min of administration.

By including these significant factors in a stepwise backward selection procedure, multivariable Cox regression model found LRN, MLD> 6cm, and cumulative cisplatin dose as independent predictors for DMFS (P<0.05), while ECE retained a marginal significance (P=0.08) ( Table 3 ).