“marginal significance”

The following patient variables showed marginal significance (Table 3 ): extracerebral hematoma ( p = 0.08), history of brain injury/disease ( p = 0.056), and history of ethylism ( p = 0.066) and antiplatelet ( p = 0.053).

The associations with the CBCL internalizing subscale were not significant, and only marginal significance was achieved for CpG-1 ( P = 0.08), CpG-2 ( P = 0.06), and CpG-7 ( P = 0.08) on the CBCL total scale.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was performed more frequently in the ePTFE group with marginal significance (35.5% vs 14.3% in the ePTFE vs Bovine groups, P = 0.08).

Interestingly, the rate of CRC detection was higher in smoking persons than non-smokers with marginal significance (P = 0.08).

Though the main effect of condition did not reach significance, F(1, 15) = 2.17, p = 0.16, the interaction between condition and target-distractor separation reached marginal significance, F(9, 135) = 1.75, p = 0.08.

Preregistered F-tests allow us to reject the null hypothesis that the effects of all 15 interventions are equal to zero [χ 2 (15) = 27.09, P = 0.03], and to reject the null hypothesis that 15 effects have the same true value at marginal significance [χ 2 (14) = 21.89, P = 0.08].

There was an association with marginal significance for HDL-C in models 1 and 2 (standardized β: 0.053, both p = 0.08).

In the case of normalized ESR or CRP at 3 months, patients with normalized ESR or CRP at 3 months showed only a marginal significance in ASDAS-ID achievement (ESR, OR = 2.04; CI, 0.92–4.55; p = 0.080 and CRP, OR = 2.03; CI, 0.97–4.27; p = 0.060) ( Figure 3 A,C) but showed a significant difference in BASDAI-CRP attainment (ESR, OR = 3.29; CI, 1.42–7.46; p = 0.004 and CRP, OR = 2.73; CI, 1.32–5.62; p = 0.007), especially at 3 and 9 months (ESR: 3 months, p = 0.005; 9 months, p = 0.015 and CRP: 3 months, p < 0.001; 9 months, p = 0.021) ( Figure 3 B,D). 4.

3 C, P = 0.002); there was a similar trend with marginal significance for TFPI (Fig. 3 G; P = 0.08).

For the left pIPS, using top 200 voxels yielded marginal significance in decoding performance ( P = 0.08), and using top 100 voxels generated significant performance ( P = 0.02, SI Appendix , Fig.

The results showed positive correlation with statistical significance in IRS2 and CUL4A (r = 0.368; P = 0.001 and r = 0.401; P < 0.001, respectively) and marginal significance in TFDP1 (r = 0.188; P = 0.08).

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03; p = 0.001) and current smoking (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.30–3.29; p = 0.002) were independently associated with HMPV pneumonia, and that diabetes showed marginal significance (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.96–1.95; p = 0.08).

Immunohistochemically, NFκB expression was more frequently observed with a marginal significance ( P = 0.080) in the EBV-positive group, but not SMAD4 loss (Table 1 ).

Risk Score 2, consisting solely of preoperatively available variables, also demonstrated marginal significance ( p = 0.08).

Implicit Black-dangerous bias is negatively related to the force rate for Black officers ( B = −1.65; SE = 0.82; P = 0.04), and reduces the role of SDO to marginal significance ( B = −0.55; SE = 0.31; P = 0.08).

The MR-unique volume ratio, calculated as V42days/V28days, reflects the examination conducted before radiochemotherapy and two weeks into the treatment, exhibited marginal significance when comparing survivors with a short term and long term prognosis ( p = 0.080).

The differences in PDFF for MF L4/5 , ES L4/5 , PM L3/4 , and PM L4/5 remained statistically significant after adjustment ( p < 0.05), while the difference in GM PDFF showed marginal significance ( p = 0.08) (Table 2 ).

The correlation coefficients were higher for FDT 10-2 than for FDT 24-2 with marginal significance globally and in the superior and superonasal sectors ( P = 0.080, 0.071, and 0.070, respectively) and with statistical significance in the inferior and inferonasal sectors ( P = 0.011 and 0.005, respectively).

Male participants showed a significantly higher level of depressive symptoms in morning BL (increased by 2.62 on CSDD, p = .007) and higher depressive symptoms with marginal significance in all-day BL (increased by 1.65 on CSDD, p = .08).

The prevalence of weight misperception also differed by grade in school with marginal significance ( p = .08), with prevalence decreasing as grade increased.

A comparison of the drug + devaluation versus vehicle condition in these rats reached marginal significance (devaluation × choice: F (2,6) = 3.80, p = 0.08), resulting from a significant increase in P1 and P4 choice (P1: t (5) = −4.92, p = 0.004; P4: t (5) = −5.95, p = 0.002).

Among the TNBC population, mutations in HR-related genes were linked to a more favorable prognosis with marginal significance (log-rank, p=0.080).

With marginal significance, recent migrants were more likely to share syringes (p = 0.08), with a significantly higher number of median sharing partners (p = 0.04).

A similar trend was found in the analysis of α-SMA expression with marginal significance ( p = 0.080, 28.3 m in low expression vs. 56.4 m in the high expression).

A similar pattern emerged with marginal significance when comparing hookup with other CSRs (β indirect effect = -0.03, p = .08; Fig 4c ).