“marginal significance”

The IEs for F tended to be larger than the IEs for H, but with just marginal significance for young adults ( p = 0.079) and failing statistical significance ( p = 0.323) for middle-age adults.

pPFS showed marginal significance between the two groups (log-rank p = 0.079, Supplemental Figure S2A ), with median pPFS of 6.1 and 4.7 months, respectively.

A significant positive correlation was found with APP expression (p = 0.004) and a marginal significance for Ki67 (p = 0.079) ( Table 1 ).

In partial tumor removal or biopsy cases, out-of-field recurrence was less frequent in the IMRT (16.2%) than in the 3D-CRT (36.3%) group, with marginal significance (p = 0.079).

When we entered the burnout-depression interaction term into the fully adjusted model, the exhaustion * depression interaction was associated with suicidal ideation with marginal significance (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.96–1.95, p = 0.079) but the cynicism * depression interaction was not (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.90–1.81, p = 0.168).

Although patients showed larger switch cost (31.7 ms) than HCs (15.5 ms) in reaction time, the interaction effect just reached marginal significance (F(1, 50) = 3.209, p = 0.079, η p 2 = 0.060).

The 7-day compressive strength model shows marginal significance ( P = 0.079), suggesting a comparatively weaker influence of the selected factors at early ages.

In the healthy controls, the inferior cpRNFL (130.07 ± 11.6 μ m) tended to be thicker than the superior cpRNFL (126.96 ± 14.6 μ m), but with marginal significance ( P = 0.079; Figure 2(a) ), whereas the superior GCIPL (86.71 ± 4.53 μ m) was significantly thicker than the inferior GCIPL (85.25 ± 4.40 μ m; P < 0.001; Figure 2(b) ).

Among the known chemokines, CCL5 (CC chemokine ligand 5, also known as RANTES), showed elevated mRNA levels in metastatic relative to localized tumors with marginal significance (log 2 fold change [FC] = 2.69, adjusted P = 0.079) ( Supplemental Figure 1 ).

Another study hinted at a potential benefit of CH on ICI treatment outcomes, as measured by PFS, but the sample size was small (n=115 ICI+chemotherapy-treated) and the association signal was of only marginal significance (p=0.079). 24 Comparisons between this study and ours are further complicated by differing cancer types (pancreatic vs NSCLC in our study) and ICI treatment drugs (anti-CTLA4 vs anti-PD-L1 in our study).

Patients who received HDCT/ASCR had a higher risk for thyroid dysfunction with marginal significance ( P =0.079) ( Table 2 ). 3.

Moreover, multivariable analysis of MSI colorectal cancers demonstrated that GALNT7 had significant prognostic value in the AC-ICAM MSI (HR = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.03–0.84; P = 0.047) and GSE39582 MSI (HR = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.52; P = 0.027) cohorts, independent of other clinical covariates, whereas it showed marginal significance in TCGA MSI cohort (HR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.04–1.01; P = 0.079; Supplementary Table S4).

The analysis on valence found significant main effect for the sound stimuli ( F (1,16) = 16.812, P = 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.512) and marginal significance for background music ( F (2,32) = 2.744, P = 0.079, partial η 2 = 0.146), although the interaction between them was not significant ( F (2,32) = 0.232, P = 0.794, partial η 2 = 0.014).

For the CBAS dataset, a marginal significance ( p = 0.08) was observed for CSF p-tau level between the healthy and dementia groups.

The analysis of criterion (β) showed that only in the anodal condition, the mainly effect of tDCS stimulation reached a marginal significance ( F 1,9 = 3.89, p = 0.08).

The following patient variables showed marginal significance (Table 3 ): extracerebral hematoma ( p = 0.08), history of brain injury/disease ( p = 0.056), and history of ethylism ( p = 0.066) and antiplatelet ( p = 0.053).

The risk of heart failure increased slightly with marginal significance for an amlodipine-based regimen compared with a non-CCB-based regimen (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.31; p = 0.08).

Results We found that c-MET expression was more common in pRCC (classic) (p = .021) among papillary renal neoplasms and Ki-67 proliferation index was higher in pRCC (not otherwise specified, NOS) compared to that of pRCC (classic) and papillary neoplasm with reverse polarity (marginal significance, p = .080).

Quadrats with geckos ( N = 29) had a higher number of high-quality rocks than those without geckos ( N = 11) with marginal significance (Mann–Whitney U test, Z = 1.73, p = 0.08; N = 40).

Paradoxically however, in Kaplan–Meier estimates, up-regulation of miR-205 expression was associated with a worse prognostic outcome, but this trend only reached marginal significance for CSM and CF (middle plots, Figure 4A–C , CSM, p = 0.08; CF, p = 0.09; BCR, p = 0.12). 2.5.

There was a marginal significance of the interaction effect between Switch Type and Language [ β = 0.37, SE β = 0.21, χ 2 (1) = 3.07, p = 0.080].

Factors C and D showed marginal significance ( p = 0.08 and p = 0.06, respectively).

Both smoking and alcohol consumption elevated the risk of ESCC, but only smoking showed a marginal significance ( p = 0.08).

Among the control variables, professional title ( B = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p < 0.05) was positively related to communication efficacy, and age showed marginal significance ( B = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.08).

The ANOVA of Prime×Target×Group further showed a significant interaction among Prime, Target, and Group ( F (1,36) = 4.25, p <.05, partial η 2 = .11), but marginal significance for Target effect ( F (1,36) = 6.74, p <.08, partial η 2 = .09).