Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginal significance

5,070 sentences · 5,070 papers · 6,631 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significanceP = 0.0801.6× alphagold
After taking the variability in intercepts into account in the GEE model, critical incident stress (0.03, SE = 0.01, P < 0.001), post‐traumatic stress (0.03, SE = 0.01, P = 0.006), and fatigue (0.13, SE = 0.06, P = 0.021) still predicted injuries and exposures; the effect of organizational stress was reduced to marginal significance (0.02, SE = 0.01, P = 0.080).
marginal significancep = .0811.6× alphagold
It may also be noted that patients on intellectual disability ward were also more likely to be long-stayers compared to mixed type and mental illness wards at the marginal significance level ( p = .081 and 0.076, respectively, not shown in Table 2 ).
Long-stay in forensic-psychiatric care in the UK.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol · 2018 · PMC5842247
marginal significancep = 0.0811.6× alphagold
The pooled results showed that the level of GSH in cells was only increased by ALA supplementation at a marginal significance ( p = 0.081), while the level of ROS was statistically decreased by ALA (SMD = –5.45; 95%CI, –9.16 –1.75; p = 0.004) ( Table 4 ).
marginal significancep = 0.08121.6× alphagold
PM Concentrations and Their Correlations In the comparison of PM 10 , PM 2.5–10 , and PM 2.5 concentrations among lag days, PM 10 and PM 2.5–10 concentrations were significantly different among lag days for both original and log-transformed concentrations ( p < 0.05 for all), while PM 2.5 concentrations were not significantly different among lag days; although, original values showed marginal significance ( p = 0.0812) ( Figure 1 ).
marginal significanceP = .0821.6× alphagold
Pairwise comparison between UT-SCC-8, UT-SCC-34, and UT-SCC-74A xenografts revealed significantly ( P = .012) higher Hif-1α scores in UT-SCC-34 compared with UT-SCC-74A xenografts ( Figure 2 B ), whereas the lower scores seen in UT-SCC-8 xenografts reached only marginal significance ( P = .082).