After taking the variability in intercepts into account in the GEE model, critical incident stress (0.03, SE = 0.01, P < 0.001), post‐traumatic stress (0.03, SE = 0.01, P = 0.006), and fatigue (0.13, SE = 0.06, P = 0.021) still predicted injuries and exposures; the effect of organizational stress was reduced to marginal significance (0.02, SE = 0.01, P = 0.080).
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
In addition, “shorter” Roux limb attenuated abdominal pain SS with marginal significance ( P = 0.081).
The Dmax showed better disease control rate with marginal significance ( p = 0.081).
It may also be noted that patients on intellectual disability ward were also more likely to be long-stayers compared to mixed type and mental illness wards at the marginal significance level ( p = .081 and 0.076, respectively, not shown in Table 2 ).
The moderating effect of the pessimism reached marginal significance ( β = 0.11, p = 0.081), while the moderating effect of the predetermination was not significant ( β = −0.01, p = 0.855).
The prevalence rate of average LLT > 90 nm at 5 months after surgery was higher than before surgery with marginal significance (50.0% vs. 25.0%, P = 0.081).
Post hoc tests were not statistically significant between all groups and only the difference between the Low and High inbreeding groups approached marginal significance ( p = 0.081) ( figure 3 ), but the differences appear to be driven mainly by the Low inbreeding level group. 4.
Radiation dose was a significant factor for LFFS in both univariate (p = 0.014) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.015), and had marginal significance for LRFFS (p = 0.081) in multivariate analysis.
Although the log-rank test showed a marginal significance for gene expression ( p = 0.081), we further validated this finding using primary Ewing sarcoma patient samples.
Second, a main effect test of the time factor (pre- and post-tests) at each level of the provision condition factor (F2F-PT and ON-PT) showed a marginal significance for F2F-PT ( F (1, 12) = 3.616; p = 0.081) and a significant difference for ON-PT ( F (1, 26) = 10.381; p = 0.003).
The pooled results showed that the level of GSH in cells was only increased by ALA supplementation at a marginal significance ( p = 0.081), while the level of ROS was statistically decreased by ALA (SMD = –5.45; 95%CI, –9.16 –1.75; p = 0.004) ( Table 4 ).
It is likely that the density of NK infiltrates is correlated with that of T cells only in the ABMR group with marginal significance (r = 0.4000, P = 0.081).
PM Concentrations and Their Correlations In the comparison of PM 10 , PM 2.5–10 , and PM 2.5 concentrations among lag days, PM 10 and PM 2.5–10 concentrations were significantly different among lag days for both original and log-transformed concentrations ( p < 0.05 for all), while PM 2.5 concentrations were not significantly different among lag days; although, original values showed marginal significance ( p = 0.0812) ( Figure 1 ).
The 999-permutation test showed that only NH 4 + -N was significant (F = 3.2057, p = 0.001), whereas D50 showed marginal significance (F = 1.5673, p = 0.082); the remaining environmental factors were not significant ( p > 0.05).
For the study design QRP model, the model achieved marginal significance, F (4,115) = 2.13, p = .082, R 2 = .069.
However, it did change the p value of the post hoc tests of the factor Fandom in the match to marginal significance ( p = 0.082).
The auto regressive integrated moving average analysis indicated a marginal significance of month on number of relapses per month with coefficient = 0.531 C95% CI − 0.678 – 1.13, P = 0.082) and adjusted coefficient = 3.677 (95% CI 2.034–5.320, P < 0.001).
The PhNR amplitude demonstrated discriminatory power for glaucoma, with an AUC of 0.661 ( p = 0.028) in the total group, and showed marginal significance (AUC = 0.574, p = 0.082) in the myopic subgroup.
Marginal significance was observed for the QoL scores for psychological (p=0.082) and social well-being (p=0.074).
Our results showed a marginal significance ( p = 0.082) between DKK3 mRNA expression and LN involvement ( Figure 4A ).
Patients with liver metastasis had shorter PFS than those with other metastatic sites with marginal significance (5.0 months vs. 7.0 months; p=0.082 by log-rank test).
Thus, we calculated the index‐OS2 using miR‐187‐5p, miR‐6870‐5p, and miR‐1908‐5p, which was the third OS‐related miRNA with marginal significance ( P = .082; Figure 3A ).
Pairwise comparison between UT-SCC-8, UT-SCC-34, and UT-SCC-74A xenografts revealed significantly ( P = .012) higher Hif-1α scores in UT-SCC-34 compared with UT-SCC-74A xenografts ( Figure 2 B ), whereas the lower scores seen in UT-SCC-8 xenografts reached only marginal significance ( P = .082).
For career control, the group × time interaction was not significant and the main effect of group was marginal significance [ F (2, 78) = 2.564, p = 0.083, Partial η 2 = 0.062].
The HLA-OWMM group was younger than the control group, with marginal significance (28 years [IQR, 25–34 years] vs. 35 years [IQR, 26–47 years]; P=0.083).