“marginal significance”

However, NK cells consistently showed marginal significance (defined as nominal p < 0.05) for heritability enrichment in cell-type-specific open chromatin regions across two independent GWAS and in the cell-type-specific expression analysis where NK cells were compared with T cell subsets using a curated list of genome-wide significant loci for AS.

Users of these products were more likely to agree that they provide adequate protein (mean = 2.6; 95% CI: 2.4–2.8) compared to non-users (mean = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.8–2.6), with the results showing marginal significance ( p = 0.05).

Additionally, intra-arrest BCR also had marginal significance in predicting neurological outcome at discharge in this cohort (aOR, 1.067; 95% CI, 1.000–1.138; p = 0.050).

In addition, the MR analyses for CKD, eGFR, and BUN further provided causal evidence for INHBC and SNUPN, with marginal significance for LMAN2 ( P = 0.0503).

Compared with the control group, the most significant drug-related adverse event was diarrhea which reached marginal significance (4.4% in the Huaier group vs. 1.9% in the control group, P=0.0505).

In contrast, the genus Actinomyces, of which the frequency is equivalent to the genus Rothia, was found to decrease in oral cancer patients with metastasis with marginal significance ( P = 0.0506) ( Fig. 3B ).

However, for L2 listeners, the interaction between attention and linguistic structures reached marginal significance ( F (1.387,31.893) = 3.692, p = 0.051), showing that only at the phrase-level frequency of 2 Hz did L2 listeners take advantage of voluntary attention to enhance their neural responses compared with passive listening ( p = 0.029) but not at the other tagged frequencies.

The linkage of road traffic noise and obesity tends to be stronger among females ( P < 0.05) and in those who took less physical activity with marginal significance ( P = 0.051).

A marginal significance level (p=0.051) was observed in 2019 (2020) in the perinatal death rates across marital statuses.

In addition, definite CAN was a significant risk factor for reduced eGFR (OR=6.2, 95% CI 1.4–27.53, p=0.016) and a possible risk factor for elevated uACR with marginal significance (OR=1.96, 95% CI 1.0–3.87, p=0.051).

Further studies are needed to confirm the sex differences because of the marginal significance result in the interaction analysis ( p = 0.051 for interaction term BMI × sex; p = 0.056 for interaction term WHR × sex).

These predictions are limited by the time range of the dataset, and caution is advised due to the marginal significance of the habitat and years interaction ( p = 0.051).

Furthermore, association with DSS was observed with a P -value near marginal significance ( P =0.051, Figure 2 B) with a median survival of 15.91 vs. 44.74 months in DPP3 high vs. low groups, respectively.

However, when paternal ADHD symptoms were controlled, the association diminished to marginal significance (p = 0.051; partial η2 = 0.051).

Notably, the number of high-quality embryos also increased with the hormone level after the trigger, with marginal significance in patients with the GnRH-a trigger (P = 0.051) in this study.

However, it is worth noting that in the dimension of introjected regulation, a marginal significance value was found ( p = 0.051), which may indicate a potential difference in a larger sample.

Furthermore, the change in NLR from 3 months to 6 months post-TIPS showed marginal significance (P = 0.051).

The SIRI indicator showed a statistically marginal significance between the groups ( P = 0.051).

With reference to sexting behaviour, males scored higher ( M = 1.94) than females ( M = 1.73), with a marginal significance ( t (199) = 1.640, p = .051).

Notably, the interaction with gender exhibits marginal significance (p = 0.051), implying that the impact of self-provisioning on agroecology transitioning may vary between genders.

Patients with sICH had a higher TIME above‐range and BURDEN above‐range but with marginal significance (41.7% [IQR, 20.7–75.7] versus 11.6% [IQR, 0–39.8]; P =0.051, 183.8 [IQR 38.3–450.9] h·mm Hg versus 19.7 [IQR, 0–165.0] h·mm Hg; P =0.049, respectively) (Figure 2E and 2F ).

However, subgroup analysis represented significant impact in only primary tumor groups (p=0.0190) and marginal significance in neoadjuvant-treated patients group (p=0.0510) ( S4 Fig. ). 6.

At 9 months, 43% of the laser group and 23% of the sham group reported satisfaction, reaching marginal significance (p=0.051) as illustrated in Figure 6 .

Although the variable” perceived health status” was not retained in the final model, it demonstrated marginal significance in the initial model ( p = 0.051) with a negative regression coefficient ( β = −0.287).

In the subgroup analysis, the interaction term of diabetes showed marginal significance ( P = 0.051), indicating a potential modifying effect of diabetes on the link between CMI and OA.