“marginal significance”

Quantitative qRT-PCR revealed an increased YKL-40 mRNA expression in the RMPP group (P<0.05), while IL-37 mRNA expression showed marginal significance (P=0.05).

The anteroposterior stability index decreased after the insole intervention, with marginal significance and a large ES ( P = .050, ES = 0.51).

Univariate Kaplan–Meier/ Log-rank analyses revealed that high-grade adenosarcomas and tumors with SOG statistically showed marginal significance (p=0.05).

In addition, the MR analyses for CKD, eGFR, and BUN further provided causal evidence for INHBC and SNUPN, with marginal significance for LMAN2 ( P = 0.0503).

Compared with the control group, the most significant drug-related adverse event was diarrhea which reached marginal significance (4.4% in the Huaier group vs. 1.9% in the control group, P=0.0505).

In contrast, the genus Actinomyces, of which the frequency is equivalent to the genus Rothia, was found to decrease in oral cancer patients with metastasis with marginal significance ( P = 0.0506) ( Fig. 3B ).

However, for L2 listeners, the interaction between attention and linguistic structures reached marginal significance ( F (1.387,31.893) = 3.692, p = 0.051), showing that only at the phrase-level frequency of 2 Hz did L2 listeners take advantage of voluntary attention to enhance their neural responses compared with passive listening ( p = 0.029) but not at the other tagged frequencies.

The correlation between explicit other-directed anti-fat bias (AFAT) and implicit anti-fat bias (IAT) decreased from r = 0.28 at baseline to r = 0.18, with only marginal significance at post-intervention, F (1, 188) = 3.87, p = 0.051.

The linkage of road traffic noise and obesity tends to be stronger among females ( P < 0.05) and in those who took less physical activity with marginal significance ( P = 0.051).

Among these QTLs, seven QTLs on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, and 8 were detected repeatedly in three environments, and one QTL ( qPH8.1 ) revealed a significant effect ( p < 0.01) at E2 and E3, but marginal significance ( p = 0.051) at E3 ( Table 1 ).

Patients with sICH had a higher TIME above‐range and BURDEN above‐range but with marginal significance (41.7% [IQR, 20.7–75.7] versus 11.6% [IQR, 0–39.8]; P =0.051, 183.8 [IQR 38.3–450.9] h·mm Hg versus 19.7 [IQR, 0–165.0] h·mm Hg; P =0.049, respectively) (Figure 2E and 2F ).

37 , 38 Moreover, variant carriers with AD exhibited higher levels of pTau217 with marginal significance ( p = 0.051; Figure 3E ), and higher levels of biomarkers indicating increased inflammation (i.e., CHI3L1, CCL13, IL33, and IL17A) compared to non‐carriers with AD.

When gender and site were added in Model 2, living alone and receiving family help remained significant, but working for pay lost significance and functional support elements dropped to marginal significance ( B = 0.295, p = .051).

Notably, the interaction with gender exhibits marginal significance (p = 0.051), implying that the impact of self-provisioning on agroecology transitioning may vary between genders.

Further studies are needed to confirm the sex differences because of the marginal significance result in the interaction analysis ( p = 0.051 for interaction term BMI × sex; p = 0.056 for interaction term WHR × sex).

141, 66.5%) with marginal significance in the unadjusted analysis (p = 0.051) but was not significant after adjustment (p = 0.562).

Furthermore, the change in NLR from 3 months to 6 months post-TIPS showed marginal significance (P = 0.051).

Furthermore, association with DSS was observed with a P -value near marginal significance ( P =0.051, Figure 2 B) with a median survival of 15.91 vs. 44.74 months in DPP3 high vs. low groups, respectively.

The SIRI indicator showed a statistically marginal significance between the groups ( P = 0.051).

A marginal significance level (p=0.051) was observed in 2019 (2020) in the perinatal death rates across marital statuses.

Notably, the number of high-quality embryos also increased with the hormone level after the trigger, with marginal significance in patients with the GnRH-a trigger (P = 0.051) in this study.

However, subgroup analysis represented significant impact in only primary tumor groups (p=0.0190) and marginal significance in neoadjuvant-treated patients group (p=0.0510) ( S4 Fig. ). 6.

Five minutes after exposure to sunlight, the 10k lux group exhibited a greater decrease in choroidal BFP change compared with the 4k lux group with marginal significance (10k lux: −0.4 vs 4k lux: 0.1, p=0.051).

The incidence of HAC infection increased by 4.6% (aHR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.08) in the diabetes cohort compared with 5.5% with marginal significance (p=0.051; aHR=1.06, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.11) in the non-diabetes cohort, for every mmol/L rise in day 2 peak glucose.

At 9 months, 43% of the laser group and 23% of the sham group reported satisfaction, reaching marginal significance (p=0.051) as illustrated in Figure 6 .