“marginally significant”

All three messenger conditions produced statistically significant or marginally significant negative effects: President Tokayev ( β = − 0 . 074 , p < . 05 ), the Grand Mufti of Kazakhstan ( β = − 0 . 066 , p < . 05 ), and the Chief Sanitary Doctor ( β = − 0 . 063 , p < . 10 , where marginal significance indicates p-values between .05 and .10).

There was a main effect of meter [ F (1,49) = 39.90, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.449], a marginally significant main effect of group [ F (4,49) = 2.56, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.173] and a meter by group interaction [ F (4,49) = 4.59, p = 0.003, η p 2 = 0.272].

The time effect was significant at T2 ( β =−2.19 , t 107.5 =−3.18; P <.001) and marginally significant at T3 ( β =−1.33, t 101.0 =−1.95; P =.05).

A marginally significant positive association was identified between depression and CP ( p = 0.050), and a strong association was observed between depression and AD ( p = 0.001).

A marginally significant 3-way interaction ( F (1,50) = 4.0, p = 0.05) reflected presence of a Category Size × Age interaction for concrete ( F (1,50) = 8.66, p = 0.005) but not abstract items ( F (1,50) = 0.11, p = 0.74).

During follow-up, 13 patients died (11 in the EBL group and 2 in the EVO group); the survival rate was marginally significant between two groups ( P =0.050).

In addition to the indirect pathways, we observed a marginally significant direct effect of ethnic identification on COVID-19 vaccine uptake ( b = –0.52, SE = -0.03, P = .05), indicating that individuals with minority ethnic identities were somewhat less likely to report vaccine uptake, independent of national identification and trust in institutions.

There was a marginally significant ( p = 0.05) effect of condition on bids, with 13.0% lower bids after glucose and 16.6% lower bids after sucralose (both relative to water).

Similarly, the left middle temporal gyrus showed a marginally significant difference (β = 0.0003, SE = 0.0002, p = 0.05).

The difference in well-being between boys and girls was marginally significant ( β = 0.16, p = 0.05), yet sex was retained as a control variable in subsequent models.

Sampling all of the 83 regions from the probabilistic map, a repeated-measures ANOVA showed a marginally significant increase in V T (F=4.363; P <0.05) after zolpidem.

A marginally significant correlation was found between the two ( r = 0.25, p = 0.05).

The mean concentration of fat in NCENSs and CENSs was 3.55 and 4.54 g/100 ml, respectively, indicating a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.05), although the fat amount based on percentage of energy was not significantly different among these solutions ( P = 0.64).

Results were considered to be significant with P -values ≤ 0.05 and were considered marginally significant with P -values of > 0.05 and ≤ 0.10.

The findings revealed a suggestive causal association between GLCA and trunk fat percentage ( P < .05) reported by IVW analysis, as well as marginally significant causative connections between GLCA and obesity ( P = .05).

However, a marginally significant inverse association was found between study duration and changes in insulin concentrations (P = 0.05).

The interaction between treatment type and time was marginally significant ( F =3.29, P =0.05).

Only one marginally significant population genetic divergence was found, between the San Francisco and Willamette watersheds (p<0.05), among the six watersheds sampled.

No differences were found in IFS total score ( p = .23) or subscores ( p s > .74), apart from a marginally significant effect in the Conflicting Instructions subtest [with amnestic MCI performing slightly higher than non-amnestic, t (17.62) = 2.10, p = .05].

Panicle number Only the main effect of Ghd7 was marginally significant ( P < 0.05), explaining 1.6% of the PN variation.

Results : A marginally significant association was found between opioid withdrawal symptoms and opioid misuse (r =.19, p = .05).

Reducing Visual Information Increased Pointing Error For both younger and older adults, pointing error increased as we removed visual information, going from full, to partial, to blindfolded conditions ( Figure 8 B), although this increase was marginally significant (i.e., there was a weak effect of visual information when considering both the fake and real hand conditions together, p = 0.05).

Pairwise comparisons showed that clients of the PSP Wellbeing Course experienced a statistically significant reduction in symptoms between pre-treatment and post-treatment on the PHQ-9, GAD-7, PCL-5, DAR-5, and PDSS-SR, all p 's < .001 and a marginally significant reduction in symptoms on the SIAS-6/SPS-6, p = .05.

Results were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant between P > 0.05 and P ≤ 0.10.

Subgroup differences for the effect of SGLT2i on any-cause mortality in participants with HFpEF and HFrEF was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) (Supplemental Figure S18 ).