“marginally significant”

In comparison to the reference population, the distribution of blood groups among all SARS-CoV-2 seropositive individuals was different (marginally significant; p = 0.05) ( Table 2B ).

A marginally significant main effect was found for BI [ F (1, 74) = 3.91, p = 0.05], indicating that overall, participants made more errors in trials which did not require BI (i.e., CBA or DBA task sequence) compared to trials which did require BI (i.e., ABA task sequence).

Post-hoc main effects analyses indicated a marginally significant difference in TL change between women who were randomized ON versus OFF HT, for both APOE carrier (p<.05) and non-carrier (p<.05) groups.

Two-factor ANOVA showed a marginally significant main effect of proximity on the accommodative response magnitude (F(1, 27) = 4.22; P = 0.05) and no significant main effect of PHCl instillation (F(1, 27) = 1.42; P = 0.24) or interaction between the two factors (F(1, 27) = 0.18; P = 0.68).

If there was not at least a marginally significant difference ( P <0.05) in a dependent variable between groups for each factor, then the factor was not included in multiple linear regression.

Maternal BMI was found to be marginally significant ( p =0.05), with a positive coefficient of 0.01, indicating that higher maternal BMI is associated with an increase in LVPWs (R 2 =0.27, Adj R 2 =0.25).

Precise statistics, beyond qualitative indication of significance at P <0.05, are not published in the Tracking Mammals Partnership Update 33 , so any trends were conservatively allocated as marginally significant at 0.01< P <0.05.

In addition, the moderating effect of work meaningfulness was marginally significant ( β =0.08, p =0.05), indicating that the positive relationship between performance pressure and workplace anxiety was strengthened when the level of work meaningfulness was higher ( β =0.81, p <0.001) rather than lower ( β =0.67, p <0.001).

Impact of TDT prolongation on finger movement parameters GEE analyses using age and hand side as covariates showed that TDT prolongation in PD patients had a marginally significant impact on UPDRS scores for finger movement (TDT, B = 36.039 × 10 −4 , Wald χ 2 = 5.564, corrected p = 0.050).

The positive association between depressive symptoms and problematic social media use was marginally significant in the adjusted multiple linear regression analysis (β=.11; P =.05).

There was a marginally significant effect of group on absolute value rating difference (between-subjects Kruskal–Wallis test: H 3 =7.74, P= 0.05; Fig. 5a ).

Using the global measures of gray matter CBF, the regression of CBF on age, ignoring eCRF, was marginally significant [ b = −0.35, t (39) = −2.00, p = 0.05].

The Pearson’s Chi-square test suggested a marginally significant difference between the number of isolates in the current and previous flowering season’s infructescences ( X 2 = 3.68, df = 1, p = 0.05), but this was not supported by the Mann-Whitney U test (U = 81.5, p = 0.09).

In regard to the treatment, there was a marginally significant suggestion of increasing the risk of hematoma expansion in patients refusing any treatment ( P = 0.05, Table 2 ).

Group differences: health-promoting factors Sense of coherence An ANOVA with occupation as between-subject factor and SOC scores as dependent variable revealed marginally significant between-group differences, F (2, 577) = 3.02, p = .050, η 2 = .010 (see Table 2 ).

Overall results suggested a marginally significant interaction between condition and language, χ 2 (3) = 5.84, p = .05, a significant main effect of language, χ 2 (1) = 79.18, p < .001, and a significant main effect of condition, χ 2 (1) = 68.77, p < .001.

Conversely, refractoriness or relapse to the latest prior therapy exerted significantly adverse effect on PFS and DOR (1-year PFS: 100.0% vs 41.7%, p=0.02, 1-year DOR: 100.0% vs 50%, p=0.03, figure 2A,B ), which was also revealed as the marginally significant adverse factor in terms of OS (1-year OS: 100.0% vs 65.5%, p=0.05, figure 2C ).

Among the five dimensions measured, Perceived Safety showed a marginally significant trend ( F ( 2 , 145 ) = 3.06 , p = 0.050 , η 2 = 0.041 ).

Courses taught by the PDs ranged in size from ten to 205 students (mean = 48), yet there was only a marginally significant negative correlation between class size and mean Bloom’s score on assessments (Pearson’s correlation, r = 0.26, p = 0.05).

Result Living in the 20% most disadvantaged neighborhood was associated with higher GFAP concentration, an effect that was marginally significant (b = ‐1.4898; 95% CI; ‐2.978 to ‐0.002; P = 0.050).

Each marker within a genetic region (including 1kb upstream and downstream regions) was evaluated for its association with the corresponding gene expression, yielding 722 genes with marginally significant cis-eQTL ( p -value < 0.05).

There was also a marginally significant congruency × smallest number interaction, F (1,26) = 4.19, MSE = 0.26, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.14; however, post hoc contrasts did not reveal significant effects of congruency for any of the smallest number groups ( p s > 0.14).

The manipulation of context (i.e., context relation or context saliency) did not affect reaction times, whereas a marginally significant main effect of context relation was found in error rates, F (1, 146) = 3.88, p = .05, η p 2 = .03, with a relatively higher error rate when the context was repeated ( M error rate = .12) than when it was changed ( M error rate = .11).

Significant clustering is defined as critical ( p < 0.01), marginally significant (0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.05), or not significant ( p > 0.05).

The first MANCOVA yielded a marginally significant overall effect of group ( F Wilks (2,110) = 3.02, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.05).