Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp≤.051.0× alphagold
A main effect of form of script was marginally significant (F (1,46) = 4.02, p≤.05, η p 2 = .08), and the estimated marginal means suggested that the pointed script (mean = 346.40, SE = 2.95) elicited delayed amplitudes in comparison to the unpointed script (mean = 342.56, SE = 2.88).
marginally significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
Significant or marginally significant sex differences were found for SC scores on the SCWT for the CC genotype and SCW scores on the SCWT for the TT genotype (Table 4 , t = –2.009, –3.163; p = 0.050, 0.019, respectively), which are both consistent (SC) and different (SCW) from the results of the above comparisons of SCWT and HVLT-R scores between males and females with all genotypes.
marginally significantp < 0.0501.0× alphagold
Egger's test results (Table 4 ) revealed non-significant intercepts ( p > 0.050) for all determinants except performance expectancy, which demonstrated a marginally significant intercept ( p < 0.050). p > 0.050 thresholds indicate low publication bias risk, with the single exception highlighting potential asymmetry for performance expectancy.
marginally significantp =0.051.0× alphagold
The corresponding correlation for the dorsal ROI was small ( r =−0.01) and the difference with the sgACC correlation was marginally significant ( t =−2.01, p =0.05) suggesting that the successful treatment response corresponds with a relative shift in caudate connectivity with ventral (sgACC) as compared with dorsal (dmPFC) regions.
marginally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
56) that would exacerbate the effects of a marginally significant violation of homogeneity of variance (Levene's test: p < 0.05 for both Seeing and Non-Seeing levels of the factor Condition) and the non-normality of the resulting residuals (Shapiro Wilks tests p < 0.05), it was obvious that a mixed-ANOVA design might not be reliable.
What is social about social perception research?
Front Integr Neurosci · 2012 · PMC3554956
marginally significantP<0.051.0× alphagold
Separate analyses of variance in general linear models revealed significant dependence of the yield on the individual tree (replicated in 2 harvests; P<0.001, harvest-related changes were marginally significant at P<0.05), the individual genotype group (trees representing replicates; P<0.01) and the individual farm (with a farm’s trees as replicates; P<0.001).