“marginally significant”

Conscientiousness showed a marginally significant negative correlation with NA ( r = −0.231, p = 0.051), while extraversion and agreeableness were not significantly related to overall NA ( p > 0.05).

Finally, we observed a marginally significant negative correlation ( r =−0.328, P =0.051) between the change scores (baseline to follow-up) of the glutamine/glutamate ratio and of HAM-D scores in all subjects, suggesting that as depression severity decreased, so did the ratio.

The difference in WMHs in deep WM between the dual‐decline and no‐decline groups was marginally significant (β = 0.833, p = .051).

Similarly, BAK and BAK + ELN decreased IL-8, although this effect was marginally significant ( P = 0.051, one-tailed two-sample t -test for CTL vs.

Specifically, across the 60 associated coefficients, only one was significant: employment tenure had a small and marginally significant effect on motivating others ( b = –0.01, p = 0.051).

The control group performed slightly better than the department group (0.784 ± 0.019 vs 0.731 ± 0.018); the main effect of the participant group was marginally significant, F (1,45) = 4.036, p = 0.051, ηp 2 = 0.082.

The post-hoc pairwise comparison of concrete samples and negative controls revealed only a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.051), and some concrete extracts measured lower than some extracts from sterilized control samples, indicating that some concrete samples had less DNA than what would be expected from background contamination.

However, we found that housing stability was a marginally significant effect modifier of the association between NYCHA residency and new diabetes diagnoses (p-value = 0.051).

A primary effect for groups was marginally significant ( F = 3.90, p = 0.051).

The probe location by group interaction was marginally significant for both untrained pictures, F (1, 139) = 3.86, p = .051, η p 2 = .03, and trained pictures, F (1, 139) = 3.70, p = .056, η p 2 = .03, pointing to a generalization from trained to untrained pictures.

When we repeated the ANOVA only on epochs 2 and 3, where a benefit of context repetition would be expected, the main effect of configuration became marginally significant (F(1,12) = 4.721, p = 0.051).

The correlation between FSH and low handgrip strength was marginally significant (OR 0.390, 95% CI 0.151–1.005, P = 0.051).

The molar loss of taurocholic acid decreased significantly (p=0.035), so the increased concentration of glycochenodeoxycholic acid resulted only in a marginally significant reduction in the total molar loss of bile acids (p=0.051).

Moreover, the three-way interaction of protection × nutrition × site also showed a marginally significant effect on barley yield ( p =0.051).

A marginally significant two‐way interaction between congruency and group was detected ( F 1,28 = 4.142; P = 0.051; = 0.129).

Comparison of plasma cortisol concentrations between months showed marginally significant differences (F (3,43) = 2.809; p = 0.051) between the first and last months of the hunting season ( Figure 1 a).

Higher scores on the openness scale were associated with subsequent fidelity-consistent modifications at a marginally significant level ( p = 0.051), suggesting that clinicians who endorsed greater openness to trying new interventions may be more likely to make modifications that preserved core elements of CBT.

In the first time-window compatible with the P1 time range and scalp distribution (112–152 ms), the Control group presented a marginally significant positive cluster of electrodes ( p = 0.051; cluster size = 203; cluster statistic = 604), showing a trend toward a larger amplitude in response to faces as compared to animals.

The interaction between Round and Policy was marginally significant F (1, 94) = 3.91, p = 0.051, partial η 2 = 0.04 indicating that in general participants tended to inflate performance more in the one-by-one condition than in the all-at-once condition.

Although the association between Internet use and smoking status was marginally significant among women ( p = 0.051), a trend towards lower smoking rates among Internet users was observed.

An ANCOVA revealed a marginally significant effect of group on AV benefit (F(3, 120) = 2.67, p = .051, partial η 2 = .06), and a significant effect of age (F(1, 120) = 5.51, p = .021, partial η 2 = .04).

2.0%), which was marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

There was a marginally significant difference in aggressive behavior (i.e., noise intensity) between the two game groups [ F (1, 47) = 4.02, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.08], such that the prosocial game group assigned lower-intensity sounds to their rivals compared to the neutral game group(see Figure 2D ).

There were no significant differences in CD4 + T‐cell count by treatment arm (χ 2 (3) = 1.95, p = 0.584), but there was a marginally significant group‐by‐time interaction for positive affect (χ 2 (8) = 14.03, p = 0.051).

There was a marginally significant preference to learn socially when receiving the hard PP, 65%, compared with the easy SB, 35%, Fisher's exact test, p = 0.051.