“marginally significant”

Additionally, higher monthly income exhibited a marginally significant positive association (B = 0.196, p = 0.053, Exp(B) = 1.217, 95%CI [0.998, 1.484]), suggesting that individuals with higher incomes were slightly more likely to consider facial cosmetic surgery.

When comparing only the L1014F frequency between groups at Chulaimbo, the difference is marginally significant (OR = 3.957, 95% CI = [0.781–21.713], P = 0.053; Fischer’s exact test) and could be limited by a low sample size in the resistance group ( N = 14), whereas there was no significant difference in L1014S frequencies between susceptible and resistant groups (OR = 0.525, 95% CI = [0.197–1.364], P = 0.185, Fischer’s exact test).

The difference in the pepsin- ogen I/II ratio for the antibody-negative participants was marginally significant (P=0.053) between the 1 capsule group (5 persons) and the 6 capsule group (16 persons).

Additionally, the DOC model, which was included as a negative control, showed only a small but statistically significant effect on circularity and not aspect ratio, where only precipitation was marginally significant ( P = 0.053).

Mann-Whitney U test between Groups 2 and 3 (Group 1 was bypassed due to small sample size) showed a marginally significant difference in BLL value changes from baseline (p = 0.053).

However, significant or marginally significant clusters can be found in the unattended condition (permutation test with small volume correction: cluster p = 0.053 for the contralateral SC, and p < 0.001 for the ipsilateral SC.

However, itemized analysis revealed that THC augmentation specifically improved gastrointestinal symptoms (U = 16.00, p = 0.025) compared to ESC monotherapy, while showing marginally significant lesser improvement in psychomotor agitation (p = 0.053).

KPS was also significantly associated with overall survival ( p = 0.010) and depth of response was marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

Finally, there was a marginally significant ( p = 0.053) result showing more non-LE state doctors (M = 6.96, SD = 9.97) than LE state doctors (M = 5.27, SD = 8.39) directly told patients their Lyme disease symptoms were just in their head (i.e., psychosomatic).

Indeed, in this multiple regression, the only remaining significant predictor of hyper-partisan news sharing besides vaccine hesitancy was age, β = 0.21, 95% CI = [0.14, 0.29], P < 0.001, replicating prior work about age and fake news sharing ( 27 ), and affective polarization was a marginally significant predictor, β = 0.08, 95% CI = [0.00, 0.16], P = 0.053 (all other P s > 0.184).

In terms of an interaction effect, one combination of educational and income levels was marginally significant relative to the reference combination (P=0.053).

65.0 ± 5.0% without), and plant species richness had a marginally significant effect (χ 2 = 3.73, p = .053).

AMS (-) subjects also carried more A than G alleles in PDGFA -rs1800814, although the observed difference was marginally significant ( P = 0.053).

The MSMM without predicted baseline, while marginally significant, failed to detect a statistically significant treatment effect and is likely underpowered (p = 0.053).

However, there was a marginally significant association between age and diabetes status (chi-square value = 4.08, p-value = 0.053), with a higher proportion of participants aged 51-70 years in the diabetes group compared to the non-diabetes group.

The 5-year RFS rate was 64% in the observation group and 76% in the chemotherapy group, which was a marginally significant difference (p=0.053).

BEN showed a marginally significant direct effect on BL (β = 0.156, p = 0.053).

On the ladder walk test, a poisson regression revealed a marginally significant effect of treatment ( z = 1.93, p = 0.053) based on genotype ( z = 2.08, p = 0.038).

Education was marginally significant (F=2.94, df=2/16330, p=0.053, η 2 <0.001).

STAT3 levels (marginally significant) were higher in AD relative to CN ( P = 0.053) ( Fig. 5B ).

Post hoc analyses showed a reduction in evidence following across actions that was significant in children ( b = −1.22, SE = 0.14, z = −8.74, p < 0.001) and dogs ( b = −0.30, SE = 0.14, z = −2.13, p = 0.033), and marginally significant in pigs ( b = −0.27, SE = 0.14, z = −1.93, p = 0.053).

That is, the effect of negative affectivity on total COBEL scores varied between the genders, β = 0.669, p = 0.034. As can be seen from Supplementary Table 1 , in boys the link between negative affectivity and olfactory reactivity and awareness was positive, although marginally significant, Spearman’s ρ = 0.247, p = 0.053, Cohen’s d = 0.62.

No significant correlations were revealed between L2 Proficiency and probabilities assigned to the blue box in the Embodied condition (rho = .12, p = .23), though the result was marginally significant for the red box (rho = −.18, p = .053), in favour of a reduced egocentricity with greater bilingualism.

2E ). Trait variation in natural field populations The interaction between population and elevation was significant for internode length and shoot length ( Table 3 ) and marginally significant for leaf dry mass ( P = 0.053), indicating that the magnitude of response to elevation in these traits varies by population.

The results showed marginally significant difference for deck D ( t = 1.98, p = 0.053), and no significance for deck A ( t = −0.61, p = 0.55).