“marginally significant”

Anti-phase tACS also induced a marginally significant reduction in accuracy when compared to in-phase tACS (t(38) = −1.958, p = 0.057, Cohen’s d = 0.314; permuted paired t -test) ( S3A Fig ).

In the early learning effect ( Figure 3 ), there was a marginally significant difference in the visual–verbal condition, F (1, 60) = 3.774, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.059, and a significant difference in the verbal–verbal condition, F (1, 60) = 4.067, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.063, between the dyslexic and control groups, but there was no difference in the verbal–visual, F (1, 60) = 0.023, p > 0.05, η p 2 = 0.000, or the visual–visual condition, F (1, 60) = 0.017, p > 0.05, η p 2 =0.000.

There was a marginally significant trend between IL-1β levels and worse motor outcomes (r = -0.17, p = 0.057).

Interestingly, the difference between the AD thresholds in session 2 for the two training regimes was marginally significant ( t 34.13 = 1.97, P = 0.057; Fig. 4 D ).

The model exhibited marginally significant moderation effects (QM = 13.7, df = 7, P = 0.057) and accounted for all the between-study variance (100%).

The interaction between Congruency × Subgroup was marginally significant, F (1, 58) = 3.78, p = 0.057, η 2 = 0.061, indicating that the congruency effect might differ systematically across the two masking conditions.

The VTS × Organizational Support interaction was marginally significant ( β = −.068, p = .057).

However, comparing the efficacy of the combination relative to the efficacy of its separate components, we found that anti CTLA-4 + cisplatin had a marginally significant ( p = 0.057) synergistic effect relative to either anti CTLA-4 or cisplatin alone.

The comparison between the weak and free models was marginally significant ( p = .057), suggesting a slight preference for the free model, while the comparison between the strong and free models did not show a significant difference ( p = .360).

There was no significant difference in overall survival between high and low risk patients according to N stage (N0-N1) ( P =0.13) and marginally significant discriminatory effect of tumor stage (T1-T2) ( P =0.057) between high risk versus low risk.

Fisher-corrected post-hoc analyses revealed significantly higher d’ values for the temporal ( p = .018) and marginally significant difference for the parietal ( p = .057) group with respect to sham group.

Inoculation treatment was significant or marginally significant at harvest 4 ( p = 0.057), harvest 5 ( p = 0.092), harvest 7 ( p = 0.106), harvest 8 ( p = 0.060), harvest 12 ( p = 0.059), and harvest 13 ( p = 0.077) ( Table 2 , Figure 1 A).

A marginally significant 3-way interaction was found between time, condition, and group; F (1,19) = 4.09, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.18.

As can be seen in Table 2 , the group x time effect was marginally significant during speech task only (F = 4.04, p = .057, partial η2 = 0.155).

In addition, the interaction between group and valence was marginally significant, F (1, 57) = 3.769, p = 0.057, η p 2 = 0.062.

In the Bonferroni multiple comparison test, the decreased group had significantly lower depressive symptoms compared to the increased group ( P = 0.012) and had marginally significant lower depressive symptoms compared to the stable medium group ( P = 0.057) in the crude model (Model 1).

On the other hand, in low-selected lines, the female response decreased over generations and the heritability was marginally significant (0.595, P = 0.057).

In addition, the interaction between orientation and grouping cue was marginally significant, F (1, 54) = 3.78, p = .057, with better part judgments in the ungrouped than in the grouped context for upright ( p = .01), but not for inverted ( p = .85), faces.

Indeed, the ABV in the PTFE group showed a marginally significant advantage ( p = 0.057), which, similar to the absolute VBG, could derive from the trend difference in the vertical dimension of the defect at baseline.

Importantly, while for the control group the interaction between stress reactivity and trait anxiety was not significant ( b = 0.007, p = .231), it was marginally significant for the best possible selves group ( b = −0.009, p = .057), indicating a nonsignificant but potentially meaningful descriptive trend that with increasing anxiety levels peripheral resistance reactivity tended to be lower relative to the control group.

boulardii, Lactobacillus , and VSL#3 probiotics in CD was marginally significant ( P =0.057) with efficacy [ 124 ].

Similarly, synovial WBC was significantly different between the SA (105,522 cells/μL) and the noSA (33,281 cells/μL; p = 0.003), while the difference between the SAnoK (99,675 cells/μL) and noSAnoK (41,088 cells/μL) was marginally significant ( p = 0.057).

3 b), we only detected a marginally significant ( P = 0.057) direct and negative effect of hatching date on reproductive status, i.e., females born earlier in the season were more likely to become a breeder as 1-year-olds.

ΔBMI had a significant main effect on Emotional Symptoms [F(1, 31) = 10.55, p = 0.003, ƞ 2 p = 0.254], and a marginally significant effect on Total score of SDQ [F(1, 31) = 3.892, p = 0.057, ƞ 2 p = 0.112], suggesting that participants with greater changes in BMI, regardless of whether these changes constituted an increase or decrease, showed different overall levels of psychological adjustment.

However, this is only true when comparing the efficiency of difficult prey to other difficult prey (marginally significant Tukey HSD: p = 0.057).