“marginally significant”

A slight reduction of IgG2 levels, marginally significant (p= 0.06) was observed (Table IV and Fig. 2 A).

The interaction between Visual Cue Trustworthiness and Task Version was marginally significant ( F (1,268) = 3.62, p = 0.06).

Furthermore, there was significantly higher vegetation cover at collapsed burrows than at fresh burrows in the semi-arid savannah site (Chi 2 = 7.71, p < 0.05), and a marginally significant difference between the burrow age classes in the mesic grassland (Chi 2 = 5.62, p = 0.06, Supplementary Table S.1 ).

Furthermore, the 45°-condition was significantly different from chance for faces, t (17) = 3.173, p = .006, d = 0.75, and marginally significant for cars, t (17) = 2.012, p = .060, d = 0.47.

Correlations further indicated a marginally significant positive relationship between TLE and parent age ( r = 0.15, p = 0.06), and none between TLE and the other two potentially mediating factors, gender and immigrant status ( Table 4 ).

A marginally significant increase in the frequency of the DQB1 * 0201 ( P = 0.06) and DQB1 * 0603 ( P = 0.10) alleles was found among subjects who demonstrated high IL-4 levels to MV-P.

In addition, self-reported intrusions of the positive autobiographical memory also correlated somewhat to general distress, significantly during the suppression phase, r= 0.32, p< 0.01 and marginally significant during the expression phase, r= 0.21, p= 0.06.

The interaction between ER time windows and groups was marginally significant (F(3,75) = 2.52, p = 0.06) ( Figure 4 ).

However, the ANOVA for sleep interval duration revealed a marginally significant main effect of age (F(1, 27)=3.86, p =0.06) and a significant main effect of vDNMP (F(2, 27)=2.32, p =0.03), in which the MMP dogs had the longest sleep interval, whereas the oldest dogs (11–16 yrs) had the shortest sleep interval.

After adjustment for age, sex and diabetes mellitus as well as laboratory and dialysis‐related variables, the risk for all‐cause mortality remained significant in the moderate weight loss group (aHR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.07–2.95; p = 0.03) and was marginally significant in the moderate weight gain group (aHR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.96–5.13; p = 0.06).

Comparison between pulses revealed that survival of beetles from high complexity landscape (HC) was 23% higher after the second pulse compared to the first, but the observed difference was marginally significant (t-ratio = 1.861, df = 166, p = 0.06).

The percentage tended to be higher in male than in female participants (marginally significant, p=0.06).

Quantitative analysis revealed a marginally significant upward trend in XBP1u expression (1.85-fold, P = 0.06) in our FXR −/− mice compared with wild-type controls, as evidenced by protein immunoblotting.

5 F and H), with a significant difference ( P <0.05) in D0.5 epiERα −/− uterine tissue group and marginally significant differences ( P <0.06) in D3.5 epiERα −/− uterine tissue and D3.5 epiERα −/− flush groups.

While no significant interaction was detected for total AAs ( p = 0.381), interaction trends emerged for specific categories: essential AAs (EPAA) approached significance ( p = 0.116), and non‐proteinogenic AAs showed a marginally significant interaction ( p = 0.060).

34 had a marginally significant difference between the US and LM group ( p = 0.06).

A repeated measure analysis (ANOVA) with amount of coins (two levels: 10/0 versus 8/0) as a within-subjects factor and age group (five levels) as a between-subjects factor yielded the expected main effect of amount of coins [ F (1, 88) = 80.09, p < 0.001] and a marginally significant main effect of age [ F (4, 88) = 2.35, p = 0.06].

Our reciprocal transplant experiment revealed a marginally significant pattern of local adaptation ( P = 0.06): while resting structures from four out of five populations resulted in relatively high infection intensity in spring when stored in their local population during the off-season, this pattern was reversed in population 609 ( Fig. 5 b).

effect of the amplitude and stimulus type was not significant ( F (1,22) = 0.84, p = 0.54); the interaction effect of the amplitude and stimulus type and professional identity was not significant ( F (1,22) = 0.76, p = 0.59); and the interaction effect of stimulus type and professional identity was marginally significant ( F (1,22) = 3.94, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.15).

For the covert-attention task paradigm, there were also no significant correlations between IAF and any of the ERP components or the latency differences between components in the UVF ( Table 1 ), although a negative correlation between IAF and the C1 peak latency was marginally significant [ r (16) = −0.45, p = 0.06].

A marginally significant partial correlation was found between the frequency of imagery intrusions and detail recognition memory after controlling for gist ( r = .24, p = .06).

The effect of chemical concentration on hygienic removal was marginally significant at 4 h (F 2,10 = 3.68, p = 0.06) and statistically significant at 24 h (F 2,10 = 10.90, p = 0.003).

While the effect of baseline gait speed on subsequent mental intactness was slightly attenuated and became marginally significant (β=.030, 95% CI 0.002-0.061; P =.06), the reverse pathway still strongly held (β=.084, 95% CI 0.049-0.120; P <.001; Multimedia Appendix 2 ).

Post hoc comparisons showed that double word-color incongruency significantly slowed down target response only when the target was not a Stroop word (paired t(19) = −2.43, p = 0.02, marginally significant after correction), but not when it was a Stroop word (paired t(19) = −1.96, p = 0.06) (Fig. 2a, b ).

In addition, there was a marginally significant difference in SSRI/SNRI use at 34 gestational weeks ( p = 0.06; included group 112 no, 4 yes; excluded group 21 no, 3 yes).