Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Specifically, Yu and Shek ( 2013 ) reported that better family functioning characterized by better family mutuality, less conflicts and more communication among family members predicted a lower level of Chinese adolescents' IA 2 years later with the marginally significant effect (i.e., p = 0.06).
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
Thus, in pooled data, the high‐trauma treatment group, relative to high‐trauma controls, demonstrated lower endline scores for HI ( β = −7.25, p < .01), HD ( β = −8.20, p < .01), PSS ( β = −3.40, p < .001), and AYMH ( β = −4.20, p < .001), with marginally significant changes for SDQ difficulties ( β = −1.27, p = .06).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Results of MANOVA showed marginally significant difference for onset latency [F (1, 31) = 3.57; p = 0.06; ƞ 2 = 0.103], whereas no significant difference was observed for offset latency [F (1, 31) = 0.00; p = 0.98; ƞ 2 = 0.00] and peak latency [F (1, 31) = 1.01; p = 0.32; ƞ 2 = 0.032] between musicians and non-musicians in spite of higher mean observed for peak latency in musicians.
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
obscurus (weight shift) was negatively and significantly correlated with lipophilicity (r = −0.84, p = 0.03; Figure 3 A), where a marginally significant (r = −0.73, p = 0.06; Figure 3 B) negative tendency between the feeding behavior and logVP were observed. 3.
marginally significantP = .061.2× alphagold
Antibody Concentration and Time to Infection Among cases, there was a low negative correlation between pre-F IgG concentration in breast milk at 1 month postpartum and time to RSV ARI in cases, which is marginally significant (ρ = –0.22; P = .06), indicating that higher antibody levels may be associated with shorter time to infection.
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Furthermore, and suggesting a lack of safety concerns might be due to feeling less responsible for the research assistant, in comparison to those who raised their concerns, those who spoke-up despite being unconcerned felt less obligated to raise concerns, MD = −1.48, p = 0.004, and less sorry for the research assistant's problems, MD = −1.16, p = 0.02, and a marginally significant trend suggested they might have less concerns that they think the research assistant was not aware of, MD = −0.1.24, p = 0.06.