“marginally significant”

After model adjustment for baseline risk factors, the OR remained significant for type II DM (aOR: 2.16; CI: 1.18-3.94; P = 0.012), QRS > 120 (aOR: 2.18; CI: 1.02-4.66; P = 0.045) and marginally significant for supraventricular arrhythmias (aOR: 1.82; CI: 0.97-3.42; P = 0.062).

There was a marginally significant difference among the three methods ( p = 0.062 by Friedman test).

This was reflected by marginally significant differences ( p = 0.062) in the area under the curve ( Figure 1M ).

The interaction of response relation and distractor relation was marginally significant, F (1, 40) = 3.68, p =.062, η p 2 = 0.08, showing that when both the response and distractor repeated, less errors were made than when only one of them repeated.

Moss proliferation, often associated with dense canopy and high humidity, was marginally significant ( P = 0.062) and may indicate suboptimal canopy management.

Intensity An LME model with random slopes showed a significant effect of Emotion [ β = 6.393 (SE = 2.364), t (351) = −2.704, p = 0.0072], a marginally significant two-way interaction between Age and Emotion [ β = 0.3916 (SE = 0.209), t (351) = −1.873, p = 0.062], a significant two-way interaction between Sex and Sentence [ β = 0.8233 (SE = 0.404), t (351) = 2.037, p = 0.0425], a three-way interaction among Sex, Emotion, and Sentence [ β = −1.447 (SE = 0.572), t (351) = −2.531, p = 0.0118], a marginally significant three-way interaction among Age, Sex, and Sentence [ β = −0.0559 (SE = 0.0297), t (347.827) = −1.879, p = 0.0611], and a four-way interaction among Age, Sex, Emotion, and Sentence [ β = 0.099 (SE = 0.042), t (351) = 2.358, p = 0.0189].

The ratio of preserved axons was 0.88 ± 0.16 and 0.68 ± 0.17 in the 2-week 1.0 mg/kg etanercept-treated group and PBS-treated group, respectively, with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.062) (Table 1 ).

The interaction effect between genotype and drug was also marginally significant ( p = 0.062) ( Figure 5 F).

In the HR group, a marginally significant trend in the same direction was detected, r (43) = − 0.28, p = 0.062.

Warming had a marginally significant effect on A n ( P = 0.062; Table 2 ), decreasing rates by 4.9, 8.9 and 22 % in the low, medium and high warming plots, respectively, compared with ambient ( Fig. 2 ; Table 2 ).

Meanwhile, the difference between nR0 and nR(un) was significant in pT1 (RFS, 5‐year rate: 92.0% versus 74.1%, p < 0.001; OS, 5‐year rate: 92.6% versus 77.7%, p < 0.001) and marginally significant in pT2 disease (RFS, 5‐year rate: 70.5% versus 59.4%, p = 0.062; OS, 5‐year rate: 72.0% versus 62.3%, p = 0.077) (supplementary material, Figure S1E,F ).

GRDP differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.062) ( Figure 2f ), while higher population density correlated with greater mortality risk ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 2g ).

The path from Factor 3 to Factor 1 was marginally significant at the 0.1 level ( β = 0.126, standardized β = 0.160, p = 0.062).

Healthy Controls and ELPH The repeated measures analysis demonstrated a significant main effect for time (F (19, 418) = 3.36, p<.001, η 2 = .13), with a marginally significant difference between players (F (1, 22) = 3.86, p = .062, η 2 = .15) for ELPH compared to HCs.

Results revealed main effects for ToM, F (1,54) = 45.46, p < .001, η p 2 = .46, and AL, F (1,54) = 251.31, p < .001, η p 2 = .82, as well as a marginally significant interaction, F (1,54) = 3.65, p = .062, η p 2 = .06.

AST showed a marginally significant positive association with steatosis category (OR=1.05, P=0.062), suggesting that it may reflect mild hepatocellular stress or early necroinflammatory activity.

The effect for Black was marginally significant, β = 0.140, p = 0.062.

Although this result was marginally significant ( p = 0.062), it suggests human exposure to HCS may contribute to the epidemiology of MRSA infection in dogs and cats.

There was also a marginally significant interaction between group and accent ( β = −0.51, SE = 0.27, z = −1.87, p = 0.062).

The increase in response to speech was marginally significant compared to rhesus ( t (23) = 1.96, p =.062) and human non-communicative non-speech vocalizations ( t (23) = 1.82, p =.081).

Results The mean tibial torsion angle significantly decreased in both groups compared to preoperative values, with reductions of − 3.8° in the PT-HTO group and − 1.4° in the DT-HTO group, with a marginally significant difference between the groups ( p = 0.062).

The same general trend emerged when correlating the normalized AUC with the sensitivity score ( ρ s = −0.83); however, the statistical significance was marginally significant ( p = 0.062).

The skin & blood clock provides marginally significant evidence (p=0.062) that fibroblasts from boys with classic HGPS are epigenetically older than those from girls with classic HGPS, but this gender effect is not apparent when classic and non-classic HGPS samples are pooled for analyses ( Supplementary Figure 10 ).

As shown in Figure 4D , only a marginally significant inverse correlation was detected between cell donor age and TMPRSS2 expression, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient of−0.58 ( p = 0.0622).

The CRF at V1 was marginally significant, with a negative parameter estimate of −0.098303 ( p = 0.0623).