“marginally significant”

Besides a marginally significant interaction effect for TS at the calf (F = 2.988; p = 0.064), Bonferroni post hoc analysis of this interaction effect revealed an effect of time: reduced TS (i.e., less pain facilitation) after aerobic exercise compared to pre-exercise but only in the no medication condition (mean difference 0.938 (SE 0.397) p = 0.024).

Need for cognition and WM had marginally significant mediating effects in congruent conditions (β = −0.280, p = 0.064).

There was a marginally significant main effect of Cueing Condition [ F (1,13) = 4.1, p = 0.064] with a marginal interaction with Cluster [ F (8,104) = 2.7, p = 0.076] in the time interval 130–170 ms after probe presentation.

Comparison of Hemostatic Parameters Across Study Groups According to Figure 2 , no statistically significant differences were found in APTT (p-value > 0.05), while PT and INR were considered marginally significant (p-value = 0.064 and p-value = 0.052, respectively).

Wheat usually had higher δ 13 C values than barley, although this difference was marginally significant (Student’s t -test: t(86) = 1.872, p = 0.064) only for La Bastida.

ignava showed a marginally significant association with carotid artery plaque ( P = 0.064), and the association was abolished after further adjustment for conventional CVD risk factors ( P = 0.212).

There was a marginally significant interaction between empathy and SIO, [ β =0.11, t (170)=0.1.87, p =0.064 (−0.01, 0.33)].

For the percentage of risky choices following losses, we found a marginally significant effect of DAT1 genotype [ F (1, 58) = 3.56, p = .064, η 2 = .06], showing a tendency for more risk taking in 9R-carriers of DAT1, but no effect for the 5HTTLPR ( F < 1) or COMT val158met ( F < 1) genotype.

The two-way interaction between Overlap and Prime Type was marginally significant ( t = 1.91, p = 0.064).

They had lower abstract reflection [ F (1, 62) = 7.81, p = 0.007, η 2 p = 0.112]; higher –although marginally significant– referential activity [ F (1, 62) = 3.56, p = 0.064, η 2 p = 0.054], and the covariation between referential and reflection/reorganization activities [ F (1, 32) = 3.74, p = 0.058, η 2 p = 0.057].

The analysis of resting corticosterone levels revealed a significant strain effect at lights on (F 2,27 = 4.32, p = 0.024) and a marginally significant effect before lights off (F 2,27 = 3.05, p = 0.064), with a clear trend toward higher corticosterone levels in LE versus the other two strains.

Results reveal a marginally significant negative main effect of repetition status ( b = −.081, p = .064), suggesting slightly reduced zygomaticus activities for repeated statements.

10 ) showed a marginally significant ( F = 12.46; P = 0.0640, species-environment relation variance explained by axis 1∶78.6%; and cumulatively by axis 1 and 2∶89.5%) association of adventive species with strawberry guava (clusters A and B, right quadrants of RDA ordination).

The differences between delays as a function of the outcomes procedure were further qualified by the emerging marginally significant interaction between the factors [ F (1, 13) = 4.09, p = 0.064, η p 2 = 0.239].

For low-intensity anger recognition, a marginally significant positive association was observed only at low levels of abuse ( b = 0.05, t = 1.86, 95% CI [−0.0031, 0.1060], p =.064).

Furthermore, a marginally significant 3-way interaction between time window, task, and transition type was observed, F 1,15 = 3.36; P = 0.064.

Although marginally significant, SRC-1 expression levels had 1.3 times higher expression levels in the group with non-organ confined cancer ( p = 0.064).

Due to a marginally significant group by correctness interaction in the omnibus ANOVA, F (1, 36) = 3.65, p = 0.064, another follow-up analysis was conducted separately for natives and learners.

However, the interaction between trial structure and visuomotor mapping was marginally significant ( P = 0.064).

The isolation by distance pairwise test on regional samples was significant upon the outlier marker subset ( Y = 3 × 10 −5 X + 0.0034; R 2 = 0.6218; p = 0.020) and marginally significant upon the full marker set admixture (Y = 5 × 10 −6 X + 0.0126; R 2 = 0.3565; p = 0.064).

Comparing the two pulse-timings showed a marginally significant main effect of pulse timing ( F (1,7) = 4.820; p = 0.064) indicating that applying TMS pulses early, directly at the offset of the stimulus display, resulted in larger recall errors (24.23° on average) than TMS applied midway through the retention interval (23.4° on average) Audible ‘clicks’ from a TMS machine can have differential attentional cuing effects when presented at different time points [ 44 ], and thus have the potential to influence behavior differently early versus late during a memory delay.

Moreover, a marginally significant effects due to age was detected [ F (2, 32) = 2.996, p = 0.064].

The possibility that deficient expression of Igf1 in osteocytes may promote calcium deficiency-induced bone resorption is further supported by the marginally significant (P = 0.064) genotype effect ( Fig. 3A ).

This difference became marginally significant ( P = 0.064) after setting the f AFLP -values with low confidence to “0” (i.e. in 13 out of 20 cases the estimates did not significantly differ from 0).

For salivary cortisol, we found a marginally significant main effect of time (F(3, 171) = 2.46, p = 0.064, two-sided).