“marginally significant”

A case-control study involving 22 cases and 44 controls showed a marginally significant difference in vaccination status ( P = 0.065), suggesting that completion of the Tdap booster may be associated with a reduced risk of pertussis.

According to the report of the IG teachers, the main statistically significant differences were a decrease in EBP between time 1 and 2 reported in the emotional problems ( p = 0.043) and hyperactivity ( p = 0.007) scales and in the total score with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.065) (Table 4 ).

One of the ancestry components was marginally significant too in the non-smoker summary score (p=0.065).

Nevertheless, the condition × group interaction on RTs was marginally significant ( p = 0.065), since older adults presented slower RTs in incongruent trials (mean RT = 929 ms, SD = 202) compared to congruent trials (mean RT = 919 ms, SD = 200), t (24) = -2.22, p < 0.05.

The main effect of Language was marginally significant (F(1,624) = 3.414, p = 0.065, η p 2 = 0.005), as the slopes for Japanese and Dutch tended to differ overall.

Furthermore, a marginally significant time-by-group interaction was observed for physical performance, favoring the multicomponent approach (F(1, 19) = 3.83, p = 0.065, η 2 p = 0.168 [large effect]).

Multivariate analysis revealed a significant main effect of probe height (F 5,8 = 33.20, p < .001, partial eta 2 = .95) and a marginally significant interaction between probe height and group (F 5, 8 = 3.03, p = .065, partial eta 2 = .67), suggesting that both groups exhibited changes in escape latency as a function of probe height ( Fig 2 ).

Moreover, there was a marginally significant Time x Group interaction; F (2, 158) = 2.79, p = 0.065, eta 2 = 0.03.

Subgroup analyses revealed that the comparison of allele ε4 with ε3 was significant in Asians (OR =1.58, 95% CI =1.17–6.32, P =0.003, I 2 =12.1%) and in studies that used the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) genotyping method (OR =1.27; 95% CI =1.01–1.61, P =0.045, I 2 =34.3%), and was marginally significant in hospital-based studies (OR =1.33; 95% CI =0.98–1.79, P =0.065, I 2 =30.2%), without heterogeneity.

However, in this fully adjusted model, the association between living alone and the number of occluding pairs became marginally significant ( P = 0.065).

The association for time-poverty-only was attenuated and became marginally significant (AME = +2.79pp, P = .065).

In contrast, self-leadership demonstrated significant variation according to educational level ( F (2, 343) = 5.125, p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.0290) with a small to medium effect size and marginally significant variation by position ( F (2, 343) = 2.762, p = 0.065; η 2 = 0.016) with a small effect size.

The main effect of probe frequency was marginally significant, F(1, 31) = 3.646, p =.065, η p 2 =.105, with higher accuracy for the frequently probe target ( M = 76.6%, SE = 3.2%) than the infrequently probed target ( M = 67.1%, SE = 4.3%).

The difference between the groups was marginally significant and the effect size was medium to large ( t (22) = −1.94, P = 0.065, d = 0.75).

Sex was marginally significant in its association with exam performance, F (1, 334) = 3.55, p = 0.065, β = −0.10, 95% CI = [−0.44, 0.01], indicating that females tended to score higher on the exam than males.

Sleep disturbances also showed marginally significant differences in expected influence centrality ( p = 0.065, q < 0.10), suggesting that sleep disturbances may have had different net impacts on the overall network functioning between fathers and mothers.

The main effect of Threat was not significant ( P = .125) and the interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 70) = 3.52, MSE = 0.01, P = .065, η p 2 = .048, with the false alarm rate for inanimate nonthreatening items being the lowest of the four item types.

The critical 2 (sex) × 2 (compliment) interaction was significant for “jealous” ( p = .006), “distressed/upset” ( p = .049), and “threatened” ( p = .006), and marginally significant for “insecure” ( p = .065).

The two groups demonstrated a marginally significant difference, t (26) = -1.93, p = .065, in the ability to manage emotions, with the DMT group reflecting higher ratings.

Participants also demonstrated significant or marginally significant reductions in diastolic blood pressure ( P = 0.065) and mood impairment as measured by the POMS (overall, P = 0.07; depression, P = 0.01; anger/hostility, P = 0.09).

Using general linear models that controlled for sex (Table 1 ), there were significant population-by-host interactions for both wing length ( P = 0.006) and wing area ( P = 0.009) as well as a marginally significant interaction for development time ( P = 0.065).

Q1) was significant in the crude model and marginally significant in the adjusted model (adjusted HR, 4.39; 95% CI, 0.911 to 21.134, P = 0.065).

We also observed marginally significant correlations between the change in SDLP and the change in Factor 4- Delayed Choice Reaction (r = 0.203, p = 0.065).

In terms of the yield-plasticity (α), the genetic gain of the 237 core cultivars was not significant, but interestingly, that of the 23 major cultivars was marginally significant ( P = 0.065), with a 1.1% annual increase relative to the mean plasticity of the 23 cultivars (Fig. 1d ).

The interaction itself was marginally significant ( p = 0.065); computing the Johnson–Neyman interval (Johnson and Fay 1950 ) indicates that above the age of 42.21 years, the effect of sex on age is significant: males have a steeper slope than females after this age. 4.