“marginally significant”

Finally, there was a marginally significant interaction of Hemisphere with Age group, F (1, 44) = 3.58, p = 0.065, η p 2 = 0.08; the difference between the N1 latency in the left compared with the right hemisphere seemed slightly larger for adults, M = 21, SD = 33, t (31.36) = 1.99, p = 0.056, compared with children ( M = 7, SD = 14).

Likewise, the difference in positive slope between pattern similarity and base rate neglect for common versus rare perfect predictors was marginally significant ( t (60)=1.88, p=0.065).

The main effect of Standard Order was marginally significant, F (1, 15) = 3.96, p = 0.065, showing a trend toward a larger dilation when S2 was the modulated stimulus, just as we observed in Experiment 1.

Results show a marginally significant interaction between level of education and testing ( F (1, 105) = 3.489, p = 0.065, Mse = 8.393).

Results Under the DIP system, risk adjustment led to marginally significant reductions in inpatient expenditure per hospitalization [ β = − 151.14, P = 0.065; 95% confidence interval ( CI ) for difference in proportions: − 311.66, 9.38] and in annual total inpatient expenditure per patient ( β = − 200.58, P = 0.078, 95% CI − 423.26, 22.10) for all TB patients.

However, the combination of azithromycin and ceftriaxone seemed protective, although the results were marginally significant ( p = 0.065).

Site Order seemed to have a marginally significant effect on the Low Frequency signal, F (1,11) = 4.206, p = 0.065, η 2 = 0.277, but not on the High Frequency signal, F (1,11) = 0.216, p = 0.651, η 2 = 0.019.

Zooming on the government size dimension of IEF and EFW (neoliberal governments ought to be small), we found negative and statistically significant (p = .034) relationship in the IEF measure (meaning smaller governments being negatively associated with P/CVE) and negative but statistically marginally significant (p = .065) relationship in the EFW measure.

The comparisons between acceptance ratios of “unfair/unfair” offer in two face conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.065).

However, this must be qualified by a significant Subregion × Recall Period interaction, F (2, 78) = 6.76, P = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.148; and a marginally significant Hemisphere × Recall Period interaction, F (2, 78) = 2.84, P = 0.065, η p 2 = 0.068.

However, there were marginally significant interactions between species richness and the presence of shrubs ( Z = 1.845, P = 0.065), as well as significant interactions between MPD and shrub ( Z = 2.180, P = 0.029), on pathogen load (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Table 3 ).

A mixed effects logistic regression analysis of gesture type as a function of group revealed a marginally significant effect of group (ß = −1.256, p = 0.065), with L2 signers' producing numerically more gestures about figure than path-only gestures (67% vs. 33%, SD = 26) compared to the non-signers (46% vs. 54% SD = 28).

Glycemic indices The change in HbA1c was marginally significant between the two groups (MD: −0.65%, 95% CI: −1.40 to 0.09, p = .065).

We checked whether this could be explained by manipulation size (β = − 0 .305 ± 0.074, t = −4.122, p < 0.001), with both effects disappearing when including the marginally significant framework × manipulation size interaction in the model ( p = 0.065).

Furthermore, a marginally significant time-by-group interaction was observed for physical performance, favoring the multicomponent approach (F(1, 19) = 3.83, p = 0.065, η 2 p = 0.168 [large effect]).

Q1) was significant in the crude model and marginally significant in the adjusted model (adjusted HR, 4.39; 95% CI, 0.911 to 21.134, P = 0.065).

We further observe a marginally significant decrease in survival associated with STK11 splice site mutations for LUAD TCGA exome samples (p=6.5 × 10 −2 , Log-rank test) ( Figure 7E ).

In this group, OOPC was a marginally significant ( P = 0.065) predictor of treatment choice and patients were less likely to choose treatment options with higher OOPC.

Finally, differences in neonatal birth weight were marginally significant among groups (p = 0.065), as was the type of feeding at 3 months (p = 0.060).

The analysis of percentage errors showed a marginally significant main effect of spatial correspondence F (1,46) = 3.58, p = 0.065, η p 2 = 0.07 that interacted significantly with instruction F (1,46) = 4.40, p = 0.041, η p 2 = 0.09.

Sex was marginally significant in its association with exam performance, F (1, 334) = 3.55, p = 0.065, β = −0.10, 95% CI = [−0.44, 0.01], indicating that females tended to score higher on the exam than males.

Time appeared marginally significant on PC2 (−6.69e-03, P = 0.065), but upon further inspection, this pattern was driven by a small number of samples whose low latitudes fell outside the range of contemporary samples.

1752) but marginally significant costs (“ p = 0.065”, p. 1752) were reported.

According to the report of the IG teachers, the main statistically significant differences were a decrease in EBP between time 1 and 2 reported in the emotional problems ( p = 0.043) and hyperactivity ( p = 0.007) scales and in the total score with a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.065) (Table 4 ).

Similar patterns of context dependence were observed for the accumulation efficiency, with a marginally significant three-way interaction between MBOA peak area, induction, and red clover intercrop (β = 0.332 ± 0.178, t = 1.859, p = 0.065).