“marginally significant”

Food restriction experiment Regarding the food restriction experiment, the effect of tail group on the successive measurements of body length during one month was marginally significant (GLMM of SVL at days 0, 10, 20 and 30 with tail group, sex and time as fixed factors and mother as a random factor: F 1,51 = 3.552, p = 0.065).

We found a marginally significant main effect of Accent Type, F (1,135) = 3.47, p = .065, η p 2 = .03, suggesting that the differences between children’s ratings of local (Canadian) and non-local teachers tended to be greater when the non-local teachers spoke with a non-native compared with a regional accent.

In addition, a marginally significant main effect of Congruence (Incongruent >Congruent; p = 0.065) and a significant main effect of Context (Focus >Non-focus; p < 0.001) were found in the P600 time window.

The main effect of time on the participants’ ratings of warmth was marginally significant, F (1, 71) = 3.52, p = .065, η p 2 = .05.

DPD and DST show a marginally significant association with DST ( p = 0.065). 3.4.

We also observed marginally significant correlations between the change in SDLP and the change in Factor 4- Delayed Choice Reaction (r = 0.203, p = 0.065).

In terms of the yield-plasticity (α), the genetic gain of the 237 core cultivars was not significant, but interestingly, that of the 23 major cultivars was marginally significant ( P = 0.065), with a 1.1% annual increase relative to the mean plasticity of the 23 cultivars (Fig. 1d ).

The comparison between the BCVAs before and after 1 year among all patients revealed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.065), which may be attributed to the small sample size in our study.

The OLT showed a marginally significant higher preference for the new location in the SG than NG ( F (1,51) = 3.549, p = 0.065; Figure 2B ).

The correlation between bullying victimization and rumination was marginally significant ( p = 0.065), and correlations between all other main variables were significant, indicating bullying victimization was significantly and positively associated with PTSD, social anxiety, loneliness, and rumination.

People with dementia ratings showed a marginally significant decline in ‘similarity of views’ F(3, 126) = 2.795, p = .065 and ‘generally getting along’, F (3, 135) = 2.446, p = .080 ( Table 3 ).

At SJER, bacterial richness exhibited a similar, marginally significant, trend ( p = 0.065).

The two groups demonstrated a marginally significant difference, t (26) = -1.93, p = .065, in the ability to manage emotions, with the DMT group reflecting higher ratings.

The difference between the groups was marginally significant and the effect size was medium to large ( t (22) = −1.94, P = 0.065, d = 0.75).

The general linear model of the improvement in fluency was marginally significant, F (5, 84) = 2.17, p = .065, η p 2 = .114, power = .72.

The difference in the response rate between the two groups was marginally significant ( z = 1.85, p = 0.065), with a positive (favouring active treatment) overall effect size OR = 1.525 (95% CI 0.975–2.385) and no evidence suggesting heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0.0%, Q = 10.84, p = 0.457).

One of the ancestry components was marginally significant too in the non-smoker summary score (p=0.065).

Estimates of EEG power reflected the group differences in sleep architecture with a significant reduction of slow-oscillation power in the physostigmine group at all three electrode sites (main effect “physostigmine/placebo”: frontal p = 0.021, η p 2 = 0.20; central: p = 0.019, η p 2 = 0.21; parietal: p = 0.025, η p 2 = 0.19) and a marginally significant reduction in delta band power (frontal: p = 0.065, η p 2 = 0.14; central: p = 0.040, η p 2 = 0.16; parietal: p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.14, see Online Resource 2 ).

However, these differences among groups were marginally significant ( p = 0.065).

flexible preferences) ANCOVA controlling for age, income, and previous knowledge of Rivian electric vehicles, we find a marginally significant interaction ( F (1, 284) = 3.43, p = .065).

Third, the association of functioning with the V-SIR, which was significant in the simple analyses, became nonsignificant ( p = 0.125) when reasoning was included as a covariate and marginally significant ( p = 0.065) when executive functions were included.

Those with commercial insurance had a higher odds of receiving prenatal consultation than those with Medicaid or self-pay and was marginally significant (OR [95%CI] = 4.31 [0.91, 20.36], p = 0.065).

However, the analysis of villus height of jejunum showed a marginally significant difference between two groups ( P =0.065).

When the burst sound appeared in the right ear (perturbing the 41 Hz tone), the 41 Hz ASSR power perturbation was more strongly modulated during walking ( M = −1.19; SD = 0.68) compared with standing ( M = −0.87; SD = 1.05); however the post hoc t test was marginally significant ( t (27) = 1.92; p = 0.065; Fig. 5 b ).

The odds of having low level EBDM utilization was lower 0.226 for married compared to not married though marginally significant ( p =.065).