“marginally significant”

This difference between the two tasks was marginally significant (t(34) = 1.885, p = 0.068, η 2 = .095).

mediator) between-subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the proportion correctly recalled targets on the final test yielded a small, marginally significant main effect of learning condition, F (1,83) = 3.416, p = .068, η 2 p = .040.

Although all other variables are not significant, household income is marginally significant (B = −0.108, p = 0.068), with people having higher annual income reporting less depression symptoms.

Obesity significantly associated with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP, p =0.005) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP, p =0.002), larger cardiac volumes (end-diastolic volume, EDV, p =0.013; end-systolic volume, ESV, p =0.040), and a marginally significant influence on left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, p =0.068).

There was also a marginally significant difference in the first presentation of the Jungle Book ( F (1,90) = 3.41, p = 0.068, η 2 = 0.037) and the second presentation of Jack‐Jack Attack ( F (1,91) = 3.39, p = 0.069, η 2 = 0.037).

While no statistically significant interaction was observed between HIV status and either treatment or cancer stage, there was a marginally significant survival benefit for HIV-positive patients diagnosed at Stage 1 (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.13–1.07, p = 0.068).

As shown in Table 2 , there is no association between nuclear YAP1 expression and tumor grade or residual disease in regional lymph nodes, but there exists a marginally significant correlation (r = 0.33 and p-value = 0.068 in the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis) between nuclear YAP1 level and tumor stage.

On the other hand, reduced risk of death was seen in patients with any reduction in tumor AEF (decrease ratio ≥ 0) and with increased AEF but not exceeding the ratio of 0.102 (increase ratio < 0.102) (HR = 0.32, p < 0.001), though the protective effect was marginally significant in the multivariate analysis (HR = 0.61, p = 0.068).

Moreover, differences in richness of typical grassland species among treatment were recorded, even if marginally significant (F = 5.69, p = 0.068).

Conversely, in the L1–L3 context, a marginally significant opposite pattern emerged ( b = −0.119, t = −1.86, p = 0.068, R 2 = 0.04), where enhanced inhibitory control was associated with faster “no” response rates.

Moreover, the differences of ERPs elicited by “NAL” and “NA” prosodies were marginally significant over left hemisphere ( p = .068).

Additionally, a marginally significant relationship ( t = 1.946, p = 0.068) was observed between decreased progesterone levels from LFP to PMP and FWHM reductions in the left STG in the MRM group (Figure 3D ).

A slight interaction between light color and illuminance was seen, with the green light at 20 lx condition exhibiting a marginally significant negative impact on valence scores (β = −0.542, p = 0.068).

Low Ki-67 expression was significantly associated with longer OS ( p = 0.03) Similarly, the combination of low expression of p53 and PUMA in TC of primary tumors showed a marginally significant association with OS ( p = 0.068).

The marginally significant difference between the conditions in the time taken ( t (210) = 1.84, p = .068, d = 0.13, BF 01 = 3.46) was in the opposite direction—participants spent marginally more time writing about the feminist topic in the repeat condition than in the switch condition ( M repeat = 232.29 s, M switch = 204.12 s, M Diff = 28.17 s, SE = 15.35 s).

After controlling for age and gender, the Christian × Non-4R/4R interaction remains marginally significant (coeff. = −0.036, p = 0.068).

Among the ≥ high-risk patients, those who did not receive ADT ( n = 8) showed a marginally significant negative correlation ( r = −0.672, p = 0.068), whereas no meaningful correlation was observed in those who received ADT ( n = 6, r = 0.107, p = 0.840).

66 ± 14%, p < 0.05), and a marginally significant difference in the single task (86 ± 10 vs. 90 ± 9%, p = 0.068; Figure 2D ).

7A ), driven by significant indirect effect mediated through reducing burden ( P = 0.024) and marginally significant direct effect ( P = 0.068).

KRAS mutation status was a marginally significant factor affecting TTB (median TTB, KRAS wild-type or mutation: 29 or 25.8 months, respectively, P = 0.068).

The main effect of GCS was marginally significant (∆ R 2 = .01, β = –.12, Z = –1.83, p = .068), suggesting that participants with higher GCS watched fewer videos than those with lower GCS.

Post hoc comparisons revealed that first-fixation duration in the physical cueing condition was significantly shorter than that in the verbal cueing condition ( p = 0.031); the difference between the physical cueing and no cueing conditions was marginally significant ( p = 0.068), with the first-fixation duration in the no cueing condition potentially being longer than that in the physical cueing condition.

Furthermore, a marginally significant difference was found in the by-item analysis [ F 2(1, 35) = 3.55, p = 0.068, η 2 = 0.092].

The flgH mutation (large morphotype from monoculture #4) also had reduced biofilm formation, but the difference was marginally significant ( t test, P = 0.068) ( Fig. 5 ).

In Experiment 3, filtering efficiency was negatively correlated with trait social anxiety ( r = −.39, p <.01) and marginally significant with state anxiety ( r = −.33, p = .068).