Intriguingly, Poisson regression of the count of paternal mutations on both parental ages revealed a marginally significant effect of maternal age ( P = 0.035) and a slight but nonsignificant improvement in the fit compared with a model with paternal age only (∆AIC = −2.4; SI Appendix , Table S8 ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The PD-UNC group showed marginally significant higher GM volume than the HC group (mean difference = -0.23, p = 0.035, post-hoc Bonferroni).
Differences in number of individuals in center between the first control and the experimental trial were significantly related to migratory strategy (95% confidence intervals: −189.31; −97.18, p<0.0001) and marginally significant for diet breadth (−6.85; 0.43, p = 0.035).
the child’s CDC BMI percentile with an OR 1.073 (95% CI 1.046–1.101; p<0.001) per percentile point, and though marginally significant, the child’s age with an OR of 1.117 (95% CI 1.006–1.241; p = 0.035) per year of age and maternal education with an OR (per additional level).
Of note, when we ran another model in which disease duration (marginally significant in the univariate analysis) was included, results did not change [for HLA-B-27; OR (95% CI) = 4.14 (1.11–15.43), p = 0.035; and for peripheral arthritis OR (95% CI) = 3.05 (1.10–8.42), p = 0.031].
Additionally, our results showed that CBI with gender was marginally significant (β = 0.118, P = 0.035).
The strength in the p-value was largely due to zero abundances; upon exclusion of zeros, the difference in richness was marginally significant (p-value = 0.035).
Correlations of personality traits with conversion risk in iRBD patients In the unadjusted Cox regression model, openness was a marginally significant predictor of conversion (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.98; p = 0.035; P adjusted = 0.12; post hoc power = 0.54).
For the binary data of “college or university degree” versus other six categories, the bivariate GREML indicated a marginally significant heterogeneity between POP1 and POP2 ( p -value = 0.035) and no significant signal between POP2 and POP3 ( p -value = 0.494), and POP1 and POP3 ( p -value = 0.94).
Another cluster of the left motor cortex, including the precentral gyrus, the postcentral gyrus, and the posterior division of the middle frontal gyrus, showed a marginally significant correlation with CMAPs in the orbicularis oculi at the Post-V1 period (r = 0.499, p = 0.035) and a marginal prediction effect on oculi CMAPs at the Post-V1 period by pre-neurorrhaphy activation (r = 0.473, p = 0.047).
Only a marginally significant difference was found between these two distributions using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test ( P = 0.035) (Figure 1a ).
Furthermore, there was now a marginally significant effect in the TB1 condition that was previously not significant in either study ( M = 0.173, 95%CI = [0.012; 0.333]), t 49 = 2.165, p = 0.035.
The observed gains are much closer to those predicted by the power-law model, although the difference between the model and observations was marginally significant ( p = 0.035) over the entire 40 000–60 000-generation interval ( table 2 ).
For age acceleration metrics, significant differences were observed in PhenoAge ( P < 0.001), GrimAge ( P < 0.001), and HannumAge ( P < 0.001), while HorvathAge showed a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.035).
Left rotation in Group A was marginally significant (p = 0.035), whereas Group B exhibited an extremely significant gain (p < 0.0001).
We observed a slight decrease in both aerial and root dry weight in 1RW relative to 1RS (average 7.2% and 8.0%, respectively), which was marginally significant in one of the experiments ( P = 0.035 and P = 0.036, respectively) but not in the combined analyses (Table 1 ).
Moreover, correlations between this factor and behavioral task results (Semantic Definition accuracy and General Success) stayed fully or marginally significant even after FDR corrections (adjusted p = 0.035 and 0.068, respectively).
Mask wear resulted in marginally significant higher corneal staining of left eye samples (0.4±0.6 vs. 0.2±0.4, mask vs. no-mask wear, respectively, P =0.035), but otherwise there was no statistical support for differences between mask and no-mask wear for dry eye and CL symptoms with the OSDI and CLDEQ-8 questionnaires, respectively, or for conjunctival staining in both eyes (Table 1 ).
The MIMOP program successfully identified three out of the four test cases, albeit with a marginally significant prediction for the 1N8Z dataset ( P -value = 0.035).
The effect of layer was marginally significant for δ 15 N values (ANOVA: F = 6.760, p = 0.035) but not for δ 13 C values ( F = 4.48, p = 0.07).
The analysis revealed a significant main effect of procedure ( F (1, 12) = 11.36, p = .006, partial η 2 = .486), as well as a marginally significant three-way interaction between stimulation mode, procedure and electrode number ( F (4.8, 57.3) = 2.63, p = .035, partial η 2 = .179).
Prediction for ABO status in all individuals was marginally significant when compared to permuted data ( P = 0.035); however, accuracy was low (median accuracy = 46%).
A test for linear trend was marginally significant ( P = 0.035), and there was no evidence of a nonlinear relation DISCUSSION We have confirmed the increased risk of death after bereavement and demonstrated its independence of pre-existing physician-recorded chronic comorbid conditions and social status.
Marginally significant correlations during the SAT condition were observed at Optodes 3 and 5 for [HbO] with the PANSS positive subscale (rho = 0.45~0.484, p = 0.035~0.04) but not for other subscales.
Supertype ST12 had a marginally significant effect on parasite intensity on these ornamental fish ( z 1421 = −2.11, p = .035; Figure S4 ).