Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0360.7× alphagold
Results: Reverse MR analysis indicated a causal relationship where depression leads to an increase in overall WBC count (IVW beta = 0.031, p = 0.015, p FDR = 0.044) and specifically in basophil count (IVW beta = 0.038, p = 0.006, p FDR = 0.038), with a marginally significant impact on lymphocyte count (beta = 0.029, p = 0.036, p FDR = 0.071).
marginally significantP = 0.0360.7× alphagold
Follow-up ANOVAs, conducted in each sex and each social context separately, revealed a significant effect of time delay on male average bout duration in courtship interactions, F 4, 32 = 5.01, P = 0.003, but no effect in females or in any rivalry interactions; t -tests on the male courtship data revealed a marginally significant increase between Live and 3 s, t 8 = −2.51, P = 0.036, in male average bout duration ( Figure 8 ).
marginally significantp=0.03610.7× alphagold
HRV ratio As with SDNN, multilevel analysis revealed a marginally significant decrease in HRV ratio during the incubation ( β i n c u b a t i o n = −0.01, SE=0.01; p=0.0361) and presymptomatic periods ( β p r e - s y m p t o m a t i c = −0.02, SE = −0.01; p=0.0165) compared with baseline ( β i n t e r c e p t = 0.50, SE=0.02; p<0.0001).
marginally significantp = 0.0370.7× alphagold
Number of retinal breaks was found to be statistically different between groups (mean number of breaks was 1.9 ± 0.8 in the 1 day group and 2.6 ± 1.7 in the 7 days group, p = 0.002), meanwhile the number of quadrants detached was found to be marginally significant between groups (mean number of quadrants detached was 1.9 ± 0.8 and 2.1 ± 0.9 for the 1 day group, and the 7 days group respectively, p = 0.037) (Table 1 ).
marginally significantP < 0.0370.7× alphagold
There were marginally significant correlations between Repetitive Behavior Scale—Revised (RBS-R) scores and the number of nights recorded with Dreem or Empatica ( r (102) < −0.21, P < 0.037, not significant after Bonferroni’s correction), but not with Withings ( r (102) > −0.1, P = 0.3).
marginally significantp = 0.0370.7× alphagold
The interaction between group and subregion revealed significant or marginally significant clusters in the right thalamus ([15–33 4], voxel = 12, p = 0.037, svc), left PCC ([-15 -51 20], voxel = 19, p = 0.032, svc), right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG, [45 18 -8], voxel = 32, p = 0.052, svc), and left caudate ([-18 0 24], voxel = 9, p = 0.059, svc) (see Fig. 3 ).