“marginally significant”

And the stemness markers showed a marginally significant enrichment in the gene sets ranked by the log FCs between stem-like and other cells (Fig. 6 P, p = 0.07), which showed the difference of stemness between the two groups at the transcriptome level.

ETV score was only a marginally significant predictor of prison violations after impression sensitivity and trust behavior were accounted for (direct effect = 0.622 ± 0.340, p = 0.070).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between stimulus type and laterality [ F (6, 114) = 2.28, P = 0.07].

Interaction between HbA 1c and age was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).

We found a marginally significant difference, t (38) = 1.86, p = .070, d = 0.61 (medium effect).

Rank also had a marginally significant effect on the highest formant frequencies (F5 min , quadratic relationship, P = 0.07; F6 min , linear relationship, P = 0.05), with males having lower minimum formant frequencies when higher-ranking (Figures 1 and 5 ).

The results also revealed a marginally significant Time x Intervention interaction for depression scores, F (1, 56) = 3.41, p = 0.07.

For three out of five assessments, namely those tapping invented spelling, phonological awareness skills, and word recognition, the difference between treatment and control group reached significance; however, for decoding the effect was marginally significant ( p < .07) and for letter knowledge non-significant.

The interaction between trial type and age group was marginally significant, F (1,20) = 3.58, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.15.

There was a significant decrease in the number of patients that were hospitalized due to internalizing disorders from 2019 ( M ± SD = 22.3 ± 9.3 per month) to 2020 ( M ± SD = 16.8 ± 7.7; B = −5.5, 95% CI = −8.0 to −3.0, p = 0.0002) and a marginally significant increase in the number of restraints per month (2019: M ± SD = 2.8 ± 6.8, 2020: M ± SD = 9.0 ± 14.5; Z = −1.96, Rosenthal’s r = 0.36, p = 0.07).

Results demonstrated a significant increase in the positive emotions category for the entire group of women, with particular relevance for the biological therapy group of women, and a marginally significant (p = .07) greater use of words indicating cognitive processes for women receiving biological therapy.

After covariate adjustment, the association between water As and Full-Scale raw scores was marginally significant (B = −1.06, p < 0.07), explaining 0.72% of the variance in that outcome; water As contributed significantly to Processing Speed raw scores (B = −0.54, p < 0.05), explaining 0.81% of the variance in that measure.

This difference was marginally significant, χ 2 (1, N = 60) = 3.36, p = 0.07.

Defined by methodology A, B, or C, higher PD-L1 group showed a better prognosis trend although the difference was marginally significant as determined by the log-rank test (p=0.07 as classified by methodology A, p=0.14 as classified by methodology B, p=0.12 as classified by methodology C, Figures 1A–C ).

Encoding of novel faces vs same faces Only one channel showed marginally significant difference in HbO between the encoding of novel and same faces where HbO increase was higher for the novel faces (ch 1; paired t-test, FDR corrected p-value = 0.07) (Fig. 1 ).

In contrast, the congruity–valence interaction was marginally significant in the H-EC condition, F (1, 80) = 3.28, p = 0.07, partial η 2 = 0.04.

Serum albumin was a marginally significant negative predictive factor of SRE (HR = 0.59; p = 0.070) by multivariate analysis.

“base + 12 month” condition (0 = base, 1 = base + 12 months) was marginally significant in predicting participants’ willingness to buy the car [ b = 21.01, t (2,379) = 1.83, partial r = -0.04, p = 0.07].

Likewise, adding relative risk to a model with only absolute risk improved fit significantly (p<.001), whereas adding absolute risk to a model including relative risk was associated with only a marginally significant improvement in fit (p=.07).

However, the analysis revealed a significant proximal intent x gender interaction, F (1, 462) = 4.80, p < .03, η p 2 = .01, and a marginally significant distal intent x gender interaction, F (1, 462) = 3.25, p = .07, η p 2 = .007.

The rate of woody expansion for watersheds with a cumulative number of burns greater than 19 were marginally significant from zero (Mean = 0.33, P = 0.07, T = 2.35, df = 5; Fig. 3 ) indicating that burning regimes implemented more frequently than every 1.6 years may not necessarily prevent woody encroachment.

Women also reported to feel more Jittery after presentation of Sadness compared to Compassion excerpts, while this comparison in men was marginally significant (p = 0.07).

We found a significant and positive correlation between γ and Self-Concept Clarity (r(81) = 0.345, 95% CI [0.139, 0.521], p = 0.001) and a marginally significant and positive correlation between γ and Self-Esteem (r(81) = 0.198, 95% CI [−0.018, 0.396], p = 0.07).

The relation tended to be marginally significant and negative in classes with high classroom group-oriented norm ( p = 0.07) but not significant in classes with low classroom group-oriented norm ( p = 0.30).

Compared to emotion words, the difference is marginally significant ( p = . 07 ).