The difference among pollinator size categories was marginally significant for live predators (Qb = 0.64, P = 0.075, df = 2), but not for artificial spider models ( Fig. 4 , Qb = 5.24, P = 0.124, df = 2).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Muscle VAS changes at 16 weeks revealed a marginally significant interaction between autoantibody groups and IFNCK scores at baseline ( p = 0.075 for 7°-of-freedom test for interaction).
We further calculated the superthreshold voxels (i.e., Fisher r-to-z transformed correlation coefficients > 0.2) in the left MFG mask (AAL atlas in Tzourio-Mazoyer et al., 2002 ) of the individual seed maps, finding that there was marginally significant group effect for the VWFA seed map ( t = 1.83, p = 0.075) and significant group effect for the left IPS seed map ( t = 2.70, p = 0.010).
All contrasts remained the same after FDR correction excepted the results of switch time became marginally significant, FDR corrected p = 0.075.
The main effect of the factor label was significant in the freezer task, F(1, 113) = 4.18, p = .043, and marginally significant in the television task, F(1, 113) = 3.22, p = .075.
Age was a marginally significant covariate F (1,98) = 3.24, p =.075, η 2 = 0.03, suggesting higher overall verbal fluency (mean score from both measurements) in older children ( r =.25, p =.01).
The age of onset showed a negative relationship with the use of novel forms, this effect was marginally significant though (β = −0.2712, SE = 0.1524, z = −1.78, p =.075).
The corresponding interaction term in Model 1 of Table 2 indicating the 11.2 percentage point shift between the White advantage in time period 1 (i.e., 6.6pp) to the Black advantage in time period 2 (4.6pp) is marginally significant (p = 0.075).
The full-null comparison was marginally significant ( χ 2 = 6.9, d.f. = 3, N = 24, p = 0.075).
The gain of the mean velocity was also smaller in the group of elderly participants; however, this difference was marginally significant (t 42 = 1.827, p = 0.075).
The relationship between the volume of ROIs and the years of driving experience A marginally significant negative correlation was found between the years of driving experience and the volumes of the left middle temporal gyrus (r = −0.418, p = 0.075, Fig. 3A ), the right middle occipital gyrus (r = −0.414, p = 0.078, Fig. 3B ).
The probability of BMD loss exhibited marginally significant relationships with disease duration (OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1 to 1.3, P value = 0.075), serum level of calcium (OR = 0.1, 95% CI: 0 to 1.4, P value = 0.085) and phosphorus (OR = 0.1, 95% CI: 0 to 1.2, P value = 0.072), vitamin D3 (OR = 1, 95% CI: 0.9 to 1, P value = 0.088), and sleep disorders (OR = 4.4, 95% CI: 0.8 to 4.6, P value = 0.088) in RRMS.
For the UVA-51 cohort, paclitaxel predictor scores showed a marginally significant difference between 28 CR and 23 NR patients due to its relatively small sample size (p-value = 0.075, left column in Table 2 ).
There was a marginally significant interaction effect of condition by time, F (3,108) = 2.371, P = .075, η p 2 = 0.060.
A detailed within-group analysis revealed that the HC group showed a marginally significant enhancement of N100 activation for chirp compared to click conditions, localized in the TTG ( t = 3.512, p = 0.075; BA 41).
Our validation tests found significant evidence supporting introgression from the outcrosser to the selfer at S22 ( P = 0.029) and marginally significant evidence at site SM ( P = 0.075).
The main effect of Group in the ON session was marginally significant, F (1, 54) = 3.31, MSe = 1.24, p = 0.075, suggesting a trend toward poorer recognition memory performance for PD patients compared to controls.
This permutation test also identified a marginally significant cluster of activity from 380 to 430 ms ( p = 0.075; 10,000 permutations), corroborated by a marginal main effect of number of words according to a 2×2 repeated-measures ANOVA on activity during this time window ( F (1,17) = 3.52; p = 0.078; two-word canonical: 3.72 nAm avg.
The sensory information-by-valence interaction was marginally significant ( β = 0.042, SE = 0.023, t = 1.795, p = 0.075), showing a trend toward processing advantages of interoceptive words compared to visual words in the negative condition ( β = 0.037, SE = 0.017, z = 2.267, p = 0.023).
It revealed a significant culture effect, F (1, 92) = 11.50, p <.001, η p 2 = .11, which was modulated by a marginally significant culture by target level interaction, F (1, 92) = 3.24, p = .075, η p 2 = .03.
Factors that statistically significant with an anxiety disorder: fear of stigma or social discrimination (AOR = 3.01, 95%CI: 1.67, 5.42), history of haven’t been tested before for HIV (AOR = 3.97, 95%CI: 2.32, 6.81), and fear of having a positive result (AOR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.55, 4.36); the burden of family size was marginally significant at 0.05 level of significance (P = 0.075).
25% at 1200 μatm (marginally significant, Tukey’s HSD, p = 0.075).
Marginally significant interactions were noted for WPI ( F = 2.886, P = 0.075) and FSS ( F = 2.556, P = 0.099).
One-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of programming ability on accuracy [ F (1, 32) = 3.867, p = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.260].
Compared to the octogenarians, the centenarians had lower mean values for all carotenoids and α -tocopherol, which was significantly different ( P < 0.05) for all analytes except cis zeaxanthin and marginally significant for trans lutein ( P < 0.075) and β -carotene ( P < 0.084).