The duration of stage II was not significantly affected by male identity or the interaction (p > 0.209), although there was a marginally significant effect of female species (F 1,79 = 3.17, p = 0.079).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The overall genotype × laying stage interaction was marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.065, p = 0.079), indicating stage‐dependent trends in genotype‐related variation (Table 6 ).
The between-subjects effect of age was marginally significant, F (1,131) = 3.141, p = 0.079, η 2 = 0.023, such that older children walked with lower normalized velocity than younger children.
There were also marginally significant interactions between Session and Lexicality, F(1,11) = 3.744, MSE = 136.739, p = 0.079, as well as between Lexicality, Hemisphere and Location, F(2,22) = 3.189, MSE = 52.667, p = 0.070.
The regression between respiration rates and distance from the nearest shore was marginally significant: ln(Respiration) = −2.648 + 0.559[ln(Distance)], Adjusted R 2 = 0.046, p = 0.079 (Figure 2 B).
We also found the spines were 3% longer in towns, although this effect was marginally significant following the p ‐value correction for multiple tests ( Habitat : χ 1 2 = 4.93, p = .079), but we found no effect of habitat on any of the other morphological traits. 3.2.
Similarly, off-medication symptoms (AUC=0.62, P =0.048) significantly predicted treatment response, whereas dose adjustment was a marginally significant predictor (AUC=0.61, P =0.079).
There was no significant association with age, baseline IOP, diagnosis, number of preoperative medications, type of previous surgery, and complications, however, only longer duration exposure of MMC showed a marginally significant association to success ( P = 0.079).
Hypertensive retinopathy was observed as marginally significant more often in DR groups 2 and 3 than in DR group 1 ( P = 0.079).
We did however identify a marginally significant interaction between diagnosis and PMI (F 1, 30 = 3.31, P = 0.079).
The only exceptions were two effects that became marginally significant: the increase in negative emotional granularity from Wave 2 to Wave 3 ( B = 0.06, SE = 0.03, p = .079) and the prediction of depressive symptoms by this change ( B = −0.39, SE = 0.22, p = .078).
There were no differences between the urban group and the rural group in estimates of female–good AC, but a marginally significant difference in estimates of male–bad AC, ⊿χ 2 (1) =3.08, p = .079, w =.015, indicating that the two groups’ participants had equivalent levels of positive associations with females activated and that urban women had slightly less negative associations with males activated than rural participants.
When these two variables were added as additional covariates, neither emerged as a significant predictor of quality of life over and above the other covariates (education level was marginally significant; b=−0.057, p=0.079) and the results were substantively identical.
In exploratory analyses following five additional booster sessions, a trend-level effect was observed in the Reasoning and Problem Solving domain (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 5 ), with a marginally significant group-by-time interaction (F = 2.817, df = 2,30, p = 0.079; η2 = 0.19), suggesting a possible effect of active tACS on higher-order cognitive functioning.
There was a marginally significant culture by somatic words interaction, B = 0.17, β = 0.19, SE = 0.10, t = 1.77, p = 0.079, a significant culture by relational concerns interaction, B = -0.31, β = -0.20, SE = 0.14, t = -2.22, p = 0.028, and a significant culture by interaction partner interaction, B = 0.65, β = 0.38, SE = 0.20, t = 3.22, p = 0.002.
There was a marginally significant difference in WM between adolescents and adults ( p = .079).
S3 A ] and marginally significant in the mPFC [t (24) = 1.83, P = 0.079, 95% CI(−0.83,13.95), Cohen’s d = 0.37; SI Appendix , Fig.
Similarly to yield, statistically significant differences in protein purity were only detected between protein extracts from non-defatted and combination-defatted ( p = 0.0019), SFE-defatted ( p = 0.018) protein extracts, and a marginally significant difference between non-defatted and oil press-defatted seed flour ( p = 0.079).
In the HRS, diabetic participants with T3 of eGDR had marginally significant lower FI (β: -2.079, 95%CI -4.396 to 0.238, P = 0.079) as compared to T1 of eGDR.
For the non-private dining table K, we found a marginally significant effect, but the direction was opposite ( R 2 = 0.01, F (1, 250) = 3.12, β = −0.11, p = .079).
The main effect of time was marginally significant ( F (1,54) = 3.195, p = 0.079, ŋ p 2 = 0.056), with baseline levels significantly lower than after the decision-making task.
Notably, AUC for this classifier was significant (0.66, p = 0.019; Figure 4C and Table 2 , bold font), while accuracy was marginally significant (0.66, p = 0.079; Figure 4E and Table 2 ).
However, there was a marginally significant moderating effect of education, F (1,285) = 3.12, p = .079, η p 2 = .01, whereby the slope relating mammal-to-mammal disease transmission beliefs and mammal bite reporting was larger for those with a college degree ( B = 0.16 for those with a college degree vs.
There was a marginally significant positive effect of the proportion of woodland cover in the catchment on the rate of migration success (parameter estimate = 1.19; 2ΔLL = 3.07, df = 1, p = 0.0797).
Standard age-range correlation analyses in Taophila and Tricholapita were only significant for the intercept ( P = 0.0184) and the slope ( P = 0.0185) of the correlation for point distribution ranges in Taophila (and marginally significant for the slope [ P = 0.0799] of buffer ranges in Taophila ).