Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0871.7× alphagold
For exhaustion, the correlation was marginally significant ( r = −0.104, p = 0.087), but a separate analysis revealed a difference––the “behavior at work” aspect demonstrated a clear negative correlation with exhaustion ( r = −0.118, p = 0.044), but “personal lifestyle” did not ( r = −0.014, n.s.).
marginally significantp = 0.0871.7× alphagold
A closer look at this interaction effect revealed that the 2nd-3rd Condition and the 3rd-3rd Condition were significantly slower than the single-referent 2nd-2nd Condition (2nd-3rd: β = 0.116, z = 2.301, p < 0.05; 3rd-3rd: β = 0.377, z = 6.90, p < 0.001) and that the slowdown in the 3rd-2nd Condition was marginally significant (β = 0.0703, z = 1.716, p = 0.087).
marginally significantp = .0871.7× alphagold
Furthermore, the red versus blue contrast was significant and in the predicted direction in the dating interview context: t (29) = 1.75, p = .046 (one-tailed), d = .65, and was marginally significant and in the predicted direction in the intelligence interview context: t (31) = 1.40, p = .087 (one-tailed), d = .50.
marginally significantP = 0.0871.7× alphagold
In addition, the H19 level showed a marginally significant association with all-cause mortality (HR 2.263, 95% CI: 0.889–5.760, P = 0.087), although it appeared to have no significant improvement for the CHA 2 DS 2 –VASc model for predicting all-cause mortality.
marginally significantp = 0.0871.7× alphagold
A significant improvement in the BNT , t (5) = 1.20, p = 0.024, a marginally significant improvement in the Auditory Comprehension test t (5) = 1.58, p = 0.087 and again a significant improvement of overall language performance were evident t (5) = 2.02, p = 0.049.
marginally significantp = .0871.7× alphagold
When each hemisphere within each ROI was individually analyzed regarding the response to the contralateral and ipsilateral visual field, paired t‐tests showed that the left hemisphere OFA showed a significant difference ( t 6 = 3.98, p = .007) and the right hemisphere OFA was marginally significant ( t 5 = 2.12, p = .087), but neither hemisphere in FFA showed a consistent difference (all t ‐values < 1.8, all p ‐values > .10).
marginally significantP = 0.0871.7× alphagold
In LCNEC patients, IPC2 tumors receiving chemotherapy after surgery were associated with a marginally significant DFS benefit compared to IPC1 tumors receiving chemotherapy (log-rank P = 0.087 ) and those not receiving chemotherapy after surgery (log-rank P = 0.075 ) ( Fig. 4 D).