“marginally significant”

Classroom organization The interaction between stress and feasibility was marginally significant in predicting observations of teachers’ classroom organization ( B = −0.41, SE = 0.24, p = 0.09).

In short, they showed that performing only an F 1 test dramatically increases Type 1 errors especially for between-item manipulations (in that respect, it is interesting to remark that a classical repeated measures F 1 analysis on the data of the main experiment of Experiment 2 yielded a marginally significant effect of word type ( F 1 (1,19) = 3.3, p = .09)).

However, perceived physical risk had a marginally significant negative direct influence on carsharing usage intention ( b 2 = −0.09, p = 0.09) thereby lending support to H5.

Indeed, we examined the correlation analysis between cycling performance (i.e., mean and peak power in 10-second sprint cycling) and urinary 8-OHdG, and we found that the relationships between these exercise performances and the oxidative damage were marginally significant, respectively (mean power: r = –0.44, P = 0.09; peak power: r = –0.49, P = 0.06).

If the standardized coefficients of the interaction terms were significant ( p < .05) or marginally significant ( p < .09), we conducted a simple slope test to examine the interaction effect at different levels to explain the moderating effect further. 3 Results Table 1 shows the results for calculated means and standard deviations, maximum and minimum as basic descriptive statistics.

However, a marginally significant negative correlations ( p = 0.09) for the post-exercise session were observed between activation of the lDLPFC and RT in the incongruent condition when controlling for their baseline data.

RT was marginally significant longer to target compared to familiar-probe pictures, F (1, 93) = 2.89, p = .09, η p 2 = 0.03.

No significant differences were found in the TELP and control groups, except in MBI (mean change 2.5, P = 0.04) and GDS (mean change 2, P = 0.03), and a marginally significant change in MMSE (mean change 1.33, P = 0.09) in TELP.

Higher Trichostrongylus numbers (p < 0.05) and marginally significant higher total worm counts (LS-means: 7375 vs. 4783; p = 0.09) were noted in the groups being moved.

When the models were further adjusted for BMI, the association of non-freeway NRAP with serum leptin was attenuated but still significant; the association with AT leptin became marginally significant ( p = 0.09) (Supplementary Table 3 ).

Moreover, a marginally significant three-way interaction was found between type frequency, token frequency, and constituency ( F (1, 29) = 3.05, p = 0.09, ƞ 2 = 0.10), indicating that constituency status (i.e., phrasal vs. non-phrasal) might modulate frequency effects.

Grazing and mowing both had marginally significant negative effects on reproductive height ( P = 0.09 and P = 0.07).

As in Study 1, Caucasian impressions showed above-chance accuracy: r = .24, p = .019, N = 100, 95% CI: .04 to .40 ( Table 4 ; the non-parametric correlation was marginally significant: tau = .13, p = .090).

We compared the locomotor response to morphine of these two groups, and marginally significant difference was found [main effects of group (successful/ failed): F 1, 45 = 3.01, P = 0.09; time: F 13, 585 = 11.17, P <0.001; interaction: F 13, 585 = 3.54, P <0.001; Fig 2A ].

For NA, acceleration of evolution after reassortments was significant in 5 out of 6 analyses; in the sixth analysis, it was marginally significant (p = 0.09).

2 ), with only a marginally significant difference between the percentage of krill and copepods eaten (Kruskal–Wallis, χ 2 = 2.88, p -value = 0.09).

However, the age distribution of accurately diagnosed obese children differed significantly across age categories ( p = 0.002), and a marginally significant difference in age distribution was observed for children accurately diagnosed with FTT ( p = 0.09).

Overall the difference in performance on the two tasks was marginally significant (p = 0.09).

The fourth-corner analysis found a marginally significant trait-environmental relationship (p = 0.09), suggesting that the traits explain some of the variation in the responses of species to environmental gradients (Figure S1 ).

7 A follow-up analysis revealed the purchase x attitude x argument quality interaction was marginally significant b = 0.08 SE = 0.05, t (226) = 10.72, p = 0.09, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.17].

However, we note that the difference in willingness for finger prick between the two groups is marginally significant, p = 0.09, yielding a larger effect size, r = 0.42 than willingness for taking strong medication, r = 0.29.

Berges and colleagues examined functional recovery in 990 Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics and found marginally significant differences at admission ( P = 0.09), no differences at discharge ( P = 0.15), and significant differences at 3-month follow-up ( P = 0.01) with Whites (102.3) having higher FIM scores than Blacks (101.9) and Hispanics (92.0) [ 31 ].

A marginally significant difference between the two emphasizes was observed: t (47) = −1.71, P = 0.09, d = −0.25), which was also indicated by a weak interaction between salience and performance (F (1, 47) = 2.95, P = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.39, Fig. 3A2 ).

A marginally significant increase in waist circumference was also observed with each month since migration to Ulaanbaatar ( β = 0·09 cm; 95 % CI: –0·01, 0·19; P = 0·090).

The difference between the VR group and 2D group during training was marginally significant ( p = .09, d = 0.50, 95% CI [0.16, 0.83]), with the 2D group showing marginally significantly lower percentages of tachygastria than the VR group.