“marginally significant”

LargeBlur is marginally significant ( p = 0.09).

Main effect of language was marginally significant, F (1, 40) = 3.03, p = 0.09, η 2 = 0.07.

There was a marginally significant group × word-type interaction, F (1,45) = 3.00, p = 0.090, η 2 = 0.06.

For the immediate feedback condition, the interaction of group by block was marginally significant, ( F (1, 23) = 1.93, p = 0.09).

Repeated measures ANOVA with factors of electrode (C3 and C4), condition (control, learned, and transposed songs), and frequency (theta, mu, beta, and gamma) revealed a main effect of frequency ( F (3,13) = 2988.37, p = 1.0 e − 3) and a marginally significant interaction between frequency and electrode ( F (3,13) = 2.65, p = 0.09).

Whereas the actual-RRT contributed significantly to the prediction of group membership, Wald = 7.32, p < .05, OR = 0.42, the effects for the ideal-RRT and the interaction term were marginally significant only, Wald = 2.83, p = .09, OR = 1.69, and Wald = 2.97, p = .09, OR = 0.58, respectively.

Repeated-measures ANOVA yielded a marginally significant main effect of Group (F(1,32) = 2.9; p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.09) and significant main effects of Statement (F(1,32) = 34.4; p<0.0001, η p 2 = 0.51) and Occupation (F(1,32) = 22.6; p <0.0001, η p 2 = 0.41).

In drug overdose suicides, the difference between the mean age of men (53.78 ± 15.13) and women (45.00 ± 17.33) is marginally significant ( p = 0.090).

A second parental motivation construct, reward, was also rated higher as a reason for allowing screen time by mothers with less education (mean 3.73, SD 1.76) as compared with mothers with high education (mean 3.08, SD 1.66), showing a marginally significant difference of 0.65 (95% CI −0.11 to 1.41; t 84 =1.70; P =.09; Cohen d =0.38; considering a P value of .10).

The marginally significant variance in individual slopes for pain catastrophizing (σ2=1.00; P =.09) and the negative intercept-slope covariance (σ=−0.38; P =.09) suggest that participants with higher baseline catastrophizing tended to show a more pronounced decrease over time.

The interaction between subgroups was marginally significant (interaction P = 0.09, I2 = 64.7%; Figure 3A ).

Berges and colleagues examined functional recovery in 990 Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics and found marginally significant differences at admission ( P = 0.09), no differences at discharge ( P = 0.15), and significant differences at 3-month follow-up ( P = 0.01) with Whites (102.3) having higher FIM scores than Blacks (101.9) and Hispanics (92.0) [ 31 ].

There was a marginally significant main effect for film condition [ F (5,135) = 2.09, p = 0.09, ε = 0.71, η p 2 = 0.07].

With the experimental task condition there was a trend toward a positive linear relationship ( r = 0.41; p = 0.11) and a marginally significant quadratic relationship ( r = 0.45; p = 0.09) between peak IAF and rTMS-induced change in accuracy.

A 2 (tested, control) X 2 (with-context, without-context) X 2 (neutral item, misled item) ANOVA revealed a marginally significant 3-way interaction, F (1, 116) = 2.95, p = .09, ƞ 2 p = .03.

However, athletes’ self-efficacy was not significantly related to controlled goal motives (although this relationship was negative and marginally significant, B = −0.11, p = 0.09).

There was a main effect of IC status, F (1, 127) = 20.92, p = .001, η 2 = .141, a marginally significant main effect of gender, F (1, 127) = 2.92, p = .090, η 2 = .020, and no IC status × child gender interaction, F (1, 127) = 0.02, p = .897, η 2 = .001.

When all participants were included, regardless of having seen the nudge, the effect of condition was marginally significant, F (2,254) = 2.43, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.02.

Physicians that heard of ASD from either the TV or the radio were less knowledgeable about misconceptions regarding ASD than physicians who did not, however this association was marginally significant (AMS: 0.51 vs. 0.62; P = 0.09).

month of measurement, was not statistically significant 1 minute after intake (P = 0.53), but marginally significant 15 minutes after intake (P=0.09).

While the association between paternal education and preterm birth did not vary significantly across racial/ethnic groups [ F (9, 24,801) = 0.79; P = 0.63], we found marginally significant evidence of an interaction between paternal education and marital status [ F (3, 24,807) = 2.15; P = 0.09].

A marginally significant exposure × side interaction (F 1,16 = 3.249, p = 0.090, η 2 p = 0.169) was found but post hoc analysis did not indicate that exposure would have differently affected the left or the right side ( p > 0.35 in all comparisons, the greater MD = −1.009).

This represents a marginally significant relative reduction of 81% in the crude OR for having an infection compared with the control group (crude OR, 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], .29–1.28; P = .09), and a statistically significant 87% relative reduction (adjusted OR, 0.13; 95% CI, .02–.92; P = .04) after accounting for confounding factors.

Marginally significant correlations were observed in susceptibility with duration of the infectious period ( r s = 0.26, p = 0.09; Fig. 3A ) and with mortality ( r s = −0.29, p = 0.07; Fig. 3B ).

The marginally significant group effect (F(2, 27) = 2.6, p = 0.09) was due to a reduced pre-stimulus alpha activity in the cc compared to the mc group (t(22) = 2.7, p < 0.01; one-tailed) and the dc group (t(16) = 1.9, p < 0.04; one-tailed; Fig. 2d ).