“marginally significant”

3a , middle), the prediction allowed a marginally significant distinction of the two groups ( P -value = .0401).

However, statistically, no difference was observed between the damage level for fruit aged 3 and 4 (age3 - age4: P = 0.8393), and a marginally significant difference between ages 3 and 5 (age3 – age5: P = 0.0401) (Fig. 6 A).

There was a marginally significant correlated response in female aggressive behavior when females were deprived of food for 90 min ( F 2,3 = 11.21, p = 0.0405, Figure 2 B).

The difference in BDNF transcripts was comparable to the results obtained from LCM-captured cells, and the applied statistic test (described in Section 4.6.1 ) indicated a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.0406) between the two neocortical neuron populations.

The differences in mean MAFs between tissues were marginally significant between male and female leaves (Mann–Whitney U test, top eQTL, P = 0.041; random eQTL, P = 0.049) and between female leaves and pollen in top eQTLs ( P = 0.049) ( Fig. 4 ).

We observed marginally significant negative correlation between these contrasts ( p = 0.041; rho = −0.312, one-sided Spearman rank correlation), meaning that the higher the changes in the BMI, the higher the corresponding changes in the number of mtDNA copies.

As for individual mediation effects, the mediating effects of physical health ( p = .066) and mental health ( p = .076) were marginally significant among women, whereas the mediating effects of cognitive functioning ( p = .041) and physical health ( p = .002) were significant among men.

Tajima's D was marginally significant at three locations and in the pooled sample ( D = −1.452, p = 0.041).

Feeding guild was marginally significant in explaining heterogeneity in the data ( I 2 = 93.01, Q M = 14.66, df = 7, p = 0.041; marginal R 2 = 0.015), but only root herbivores (with 4 data points) showed a significant negative effect size (Figure S1 ).

According to the Mann-Whitney U test, difference between chitosan and formocresol was not significant ( P =0.233); difference between chitosan and CMCP was marginally significant, with chitosan showing a greater reduction ( P =0.041, mean ranks: Chitosan=18.77, CMCP=12.23); and there was a marginally significant difference between formocresol and CMCP ( P =0.045, mean ranks: Formocresol=18.73, CMCP=12.27).

The second SNP, rs9493627, replicated in the UK Biobank (p = 0.0095), the other GERA race/ethnicity groups (p = 0.0080), and was marginally significant and in the correct direction for SRT (p = 0.041) and suggestively so for SDS (p = 0.081).

In addition, the rate of cancer-bearing offspring was higher in the InterVar P or LP carriers than in the others with marginally significant (p = 0.041).

There was a marginally significant ( P = 0.041) difference in the median time devoted to academic medicine between residents anticipating a fellowship (95%) versus those not anticipating a fellowship (90%).

The power within each spectral band did not statistically differ among the nine intervals based on Friedman tests for the VLF band (p=0.358) or the LF band (p=0.081) but was marginally significant for the HF band (p=0.041).

Among all other populations only Tasmanian flies show a marginally significant among-line variation ( P -value = 0.041).

Yet, there was a marginally significant improvement in PFS with atezolizumab compared with placebo in the ITT population [hazard ratio (HR), 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69 to 0.99; P=0.041; median PFS 13.5 vs. 11.3 months, respectively].

The month was marginally significant at p = 0.041.

There were marginally significant interactions between visit and age (visit*age-group: F (3,71) = 2.89, p = 0.041) and visit, age and TV-group (visit*age-group*TV-group: F (6,71) = 2.30, p = 0.044).

The association was marginally significant among participants with obesity (1.11 [1.00, 1.23], p = 0.041).

In cross-sectional normative models (C-Norms), marginally significant group differences were found among negative deviators at the 2-year follow-up in the left occipital (H(4) = 9.96, p = 0.041) and parietal (H(4) = 14.38, p = 0.0062) lobes; Dunn’s post-hoc tests suggested a mid- vs. late-pubertal group difference in the parietal lobe ( p = 0.0053) but not in any of the pubertal stages for the occipital lobe (min p = 0.139 for mid- vs. late-pubertal).

Although the investigated polymorphisms were not related to demographic features, clinicopathological lung tumour characteristics, or blood morphology indices, marginally significant correlations were found with some variables: C1236T with age of disease onset ( p =0.0410); C3435T with smoking status ( p =0.0561).

Further two-way PerMANOVA based on samples from two host species with the same localities indicated that localities had a significant effect on the Burkholderia community (Bray–Curtis, F = 1.521, p = 0.020; Jaccard, F = 1.311, p = 0.001) and that host species also had a marginally significant effect on the Burkholderia community (Bray–Curtis, F = 1.842, p = 0.041; Jaccard, F = 1.298, p = 0.045).

Moreover, though a marginally significant difference of rs3095661 alleles was found between controls and cases ( P = 0.041, Table 2 ), no significant difference of rs3095661 genotypes was found in the four models between controls and cases ( P = 0.362, P = 0.066, P = 0.999, P = 0.197, respectively, Table 3 ).

The interaction was marginally significant, F (1, 549) = 4.18, p = .041, η p 2 = .01, indicating a stronger out-group effect among rightists ( d = -.34 [-.48, -.22]) than among leftists ( d = -.19 [-.31, -.07]).

We also found a marginally significant ( P = .041) correlation between high expression of this genes’ signature and better OS in patients with endometrial carcinomas.