“marginally significant”

This difference was marginally significant.

A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, whereas a P value of < 0.1 was considered marginally significant.

Our quantitative results indicated statistically significant improvements in peer interaction skills and marginally significant improvements in communication skills.

Results were similar in years 1 and 2 combined, albeit marginally significant (PR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84–1.00) ( Figure 2 , Table 2 ).

Finally, the distance to forest patches larger than 5 ha modulates the abundance of the species, which is slightly (and marginally significant) higher at greater distances from forest areas ( Figure 2 F). 4.

Cross-sectional analyses The meta-analysis showed that compared to individuals without quarantine, individuals with quarantine exposure exhibited a higher prevalence of probable anxiety (pooled adjusted overall PR: 1.21 [95% CI: 1.08–1.36]), while the likelihood of a higher exposure prevalence of probable depression was marginally significant (pooled adjusted overall PR: 1.19 [0.999–1.42]; Fig. 1 ; please see results of crude model in Table S6 in Additional file 1 ).

Note that Gene Ontology (GO) terms of the 53 genes were associated with oxidative stress, cell death, and defense response, but only had marginally significant adjusted P -values (0.04, 0.10, and 0.07, respectively).

This trend was observed across all RCC subtypes, though none reached individual statistical significance, with pRCC being marginally significant.

Finally, there was a marginally significant habitat × cushion interaction ( P Habitat × Cushion < 0.1), due to a tendency in both mountain ranges for lower bacterial diversity in the open than below cushions in the tight cushion habitats and the converse in the loose cushion habitats.

Concerning the dependent variable warmth, we observed a marginally significant interaction effect of negative instrumentality (i.e., detrimental diverse vs. instrumental diverse condition) on the relationship between instrumentality-based pro-diversity beliefs and warmth ( b = -0.328, SE = 0.167, p = .052, CI 95% = -0.659, 0.003).

The two-way interaction between the factors of pillar and target position was marginally significant ( F (2.99,89.57) = 2.59, partial η 2 = 0.079, p corrected = 0.058), and the difference in the mean RTs between the tilted and vertical pillar conditions was marginally significant at the far-right and far-left positions (far-right: t (150) = 1.750, p = 0.082; far-left: t (150) = 1.781, p = 0.077; two-tails tests).

On the contrary, by considering all participants as a whole, MA and ANS acuity shows a weaker correlation that turned out to be marginally significant.

Also the covariates gender of participants— F (5, 442) = 3.136, p = .009, Wilks' Λ = .966, partial η 2 = .043—and previous knowledge of giftedness— F (5, 442) = 2.889, p = .014, Wilks' Λ = .968, partial η 2 = .032—were, respectively, significative and marginally significant.

It should be noted that biospheric values ( p = 0.056) were marginally significant.

reported [ 103 ] that the bioavailability of J-aggregates of zeaxanthin dipalmitate formulation was 23% higher than that of the H-aggregates of zeaxanthin but that the effect was marginally significant.

Insomnia index ( β = −0.01, p < 0.1) had a marginally significant negative effect on psychological resilience, that means higher insomnia index was linked to lower psychological resilience.

A significant correlation was detected between root PCoA scores and PD ( r = −0.573, p < 0.01, Figure 2 b) and a marginally significant correlation with DSI ( r = −0.437).

The association for the “POPs without VOCs” group was marginally significant (p-value 0.110).

In turn, a study with participation of general US adult population demonstrated inverse association between γ-tocopherol and leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and positive association with α-tocopherol and LTL (marginally significant).

Consequent analysis of the survival effect of IGFBP-3 and TMEM219 in clinical subgroups of the breast cancer cohort revealed that clinical subgroup annotated as “histological type-Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma” show marginally significant association of IGFBP-3 (FDR = 2.01∙10 −1 (HR = 0.36)) and TMEM219 ((3.96∙10 −2 (HR = 0.25)) with the survival outcome ( Figure 10 B,C).

The infection×size interactions for host shoot and root biomass were marginally significant ( Table 1 ).

In terms of confidence ratings for each test, the effect was significant or marginally significant, with higher scores in the 2D map-assisted field navigation learning group.

In particular, in the interactions model, level of TB knowledge has a marginally significant association with positive attitude towards ambulatory TB treatment among community controls (OR = 1.79; 95% CI = 0.89–3.61).

The odds of testing positive were also elevated for individuals aged 25–35 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.97–2.64, p = 0.063), though this effect was marginally significant.

Among the facets of Mindfulness, results showed a significant effect for Acting with Awareness and a marginally significant effect for Non-reacting.