“marginally significant”

The only exception was that the Level-1 association between child peak negative emotion and maternal ED changed from significant to marginally significant, likely reflecting reduced power due to dichotomization.

Additionally, the reduced number of sequenced samples for some groups, due to lipid-rich fecal material that impaired gDNA extraction, lowered the statistical power for some pairwise taxon comparisons and necessitates caution in overinterpreting marginally significant differences.

Despite the observed heterogeneity across studies, the overall effects for PFS ( Z = 2.14, p = 0.03) and OS ( Z = 1.99, p = 0.05) were marginally significant, suggesting a potential benefit of monotherapy over combined therapy for both survival outcomes.

We considered results statistically significant at three levels: highly significant ( p < = 0.001 ***), significant ( p < = 0.05 **) and marginally significant ( p < = 0.1 *).

The results showed a positive association between fecal melatonin and sleep onset latency (coef = 0.1096, p = 0.02, std= 0.05), which remained marginally significant after multiple comparison adjustment (FDR = 0.053).

We also observed similar effects for hypothesis H4, with the exception that the marginally significant effect reported above between the change in SSC and group emotion perception became significant when also controlling for precision of estimates in the control perception task (see Supplementary table S11b).

sTREM-1 plasma concentrations differed marginally significant between groups at V1, whereas there was no statistical difference at V3.

Moreover, regional β-amyloid burden was similar between subtypes (Table 4 ) except for a higher idiotypic cortex β-amyloid burden in limbic subtype cases compared to typical Braak subtype cases with a marginally significant p-value of 0.042 (without adjustment for multiple comparisons).

However, particularly for outcomes with marginally significant P values, these results should be interpreted with caution due to multiple comparisons.

The Azarbarzin method (fixed baseline) and de Chazal method (record-specific baseline) were significant in the partially adjusted model but became marginally significant after adjustment for all covariates.

Figure 3 depicts this marginally significant “inverted U” pattern, whereby the greatest improvement in depression/anxiety symptoms was associated with very low- or very high levels of relative exertion.

The results showed that the interactive effects were marginally significant and significant in prefrontal activation in three channels (ch13, ch14, ch26) during the VFT.

Regarding individual factors, CUT has a negative influence on both WESA and WSA, and its effect on work stress is marginally significant in both cases.

This may increase type I error, making some marginally significant associations potentially false positives.

Cancer survivors had a marginally significant higher risk of distal radius fractures.

There was a marginally significant correlation between cigarette consumption in pack-year and PFS and there was no correlation between cigarette consumption and OS (Suppl.

Post-analysis, genes that retained significance after accounting for the LD structure were deemed jointly significant, while those that lost significance were classified as marginally significant.

Centrality invariance tests revealed significant or marginally significant differences in disease stigma nodes (IS and ES) across some group comparisons: marginally significant in HEN nodes ( p = 0.026); No significant differences in centrality were found for any nodes in Network 2 vs.

A statistically significant difference was observed between H1 and H3 (p = 0.034 < 0.05), while the comparison between H1 and M3 showed a marginally significant difference (p = 0.069 < 0.1).

In conclusion, while the majority of methods do not show a significant causal relationship between CeD and stroke, the RAPS method does detect a marginally significant association.

Phenotypically, CD206 (Mφ2), but also CD80 (Mφ1) decreased at both time points, with CD206 marginally significant at 24 h, ( Fig. 3 D), while overall macrophage population (F4/80 + ) remained stable ( Fig. 3 A).

Therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution, particularly for marginally significant associations. 3.

However, marginally significant differences were observed between the formulations MN1, MN2, and MN3, with p -values of 0.0525 at pH 7.4 and 0.053 at pH 2, suggesting a consistent trend toward higher cumulative release from MN3 under both conditions.

However, the slope difference between LOCI and control clinics was marginally significant ( b =.06, 95%CI [-0.02, .13]), suggesting that LOCI exposure may have mitigated the negative VA trajectory for those clinics.

There was a marginally significant interaction effect between peer support and discrimination on T2 depression.