“marginally significant”

Moreover, no correlation was found between either the RBD or NAb titer at T2 with T- and B-lymphocyte subpopulations, except for a marginally significant positive correlation of NAb titers with the CD4 + CD28 – CD57 + percentage (BC=0.359, R 2 =0.129, P =0.05) at T2.

lanceolatum MRF neighborhood and human chromosomes 11 and 12 (binomial test, 11: P < 2 × 10 −3 , 12: P < 1 × 10 −2 ; Barnard’s exact test, 11: P < 1 × 10 −10 , 12: P < 2 × 10 −8 ; supplementary information 6 c – d , Supplementary Material online), whereas there was no significant association observed with chromosome 1, and only a marginally significant association with 19 in one of the tests (Barnard’s exact test, P < 0.05).

Uncorrected p-values only indicated a marginally significant effect of emotional ACE on the response criterion ( b = 0.16, 95% CI [0, 0.33], p = 0.05) with roughly 8% explained variance (adjusted R 2 = 0.077).

Interaction test for OS between treatment and PIK3CA was significant in the univariate ( P = 0.04) and marginally significant in the multivariate analysis ( P = 0.05).

However, patients on cinacalcet with hypertension (HYT) or diabetes mellitus plus hypertension (DM + HYT) as the underlying etiology showed a marginally significant reduction in hazard ratios ( p = 0.05 and 0.04, respectively).

The difference in slope was marginally significant in the piecewise linear model ( p = 0.05).

In the 1 donor’s LCs that supported replication of all variants, higher amounts of infectious virus was observed in transmitter as compared to recipient envelope viruses in 7 of the 9 couples, and this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.05).

In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, a marginally significant association was found among Caucasians (OR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.02 – 5.80, P = 0.05) but not among Asians (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.67 – 2.32, P = 0.49) (Table 2 ).

Low anxiety was related to a marginally significant effect of emotion, with poorer performance (that means, i.e., enhanced suppression) for negative compared to neutral scenes, p = 0.05.

Of 39 patients with a surgery background, 30 showed edema, 13 (33%) in a period greater than the median and 17 (43%) lower than the median, and this comparison was not different from the statistical viewpoint (χ 2 = 0.41; P = 0.75); notwithstanding, if we consider the average of this interval (32.4 months), the difference is marginally significant ( P = 0.05).

For successful inflations, we found a marginally significant effect in the latency of the P2 over inflation steps, χ 2 (7) = 14.039, p = .050, while the main effect of condition was insignificant ( p = .726).

30 Because marginally significant interaction was found for PA changes and baseline obesity status ( p = 0.05), we conducted stratification analyses by baseline obesity status.

The training group (median=6.50) reported lower levels of perceived usefulness than the nontraining group (median=6.92) at the marginally significant level ( U =4.50, Z=−1.99, P =.05).

Hypothesis testing As predicted, ANOVA analysis (scarcity appeal × need for uniqueness) with purchase intention as the dependent variable indicated that the interaction between the two independent variables was marginally significant ( F (1, 122) = 8.32, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.064).

Separate analyses of variance in general linear models revealed significant dependence of the yield on the individual tree (replicated in 2 harvests; P<0.001, harvest-related changes were marginally significant at P<0.05), the individual genotype group (trees representing replicates; P<0.01) and the individual farm (with a farm’s trees as replicates; P<0.001).

Microbial beta diversity analysis showed a marginally significant difference in overall community composition across groups (R 2 = 0.033, p = 0.05).

While estimates calculated using this correction factor did not appreciably differ from uncorrected estimates, the HR for obese class 1 went from being marginally significant at the p < 0.05 threshold to being no longer significant at that threshold.

In addition to exerting effects via BMI at age 11 (β = 0.34, SE = 0.04, p = 0.00), marginally significant indirect effects were identified via the pathway from BMI at 11 years to body dissatisfaction at 11 years (β = 0.03, SE = 0.01, p = 0.05).

If there was not at least a marginally significant difference ( P <0.05) in a dependent variable between groups for each factor, then the factor was not included in multiple linear regression.

Mixed-effect linear models with population included as a fixed effect showed marginally significant relationships between Ne LD and L inbreed (R 2 = 0.06; P = 0.05), and Ne LD and L realized (R 2 = 0.05; P = 0.04).

In addition to this, shape similarity and familiarity difference each levied only a marginally significant effect on predicted hue distance (Beta = −0.149, p = 0.05; Beta = 0.141, p = 0.07, respectively).

Inspection of the total number of errors made on these S− start trials also revealed a marginally significant difference between the two groups ( t 19 = 2.09; p = 0.050; data not shown).

The direct effect of forgiveness on mobile phone addiction was not significant ( B = −0.16, SE = 0.15, t = −1.04, p = 0.30, 95% CI [−0.47, 0.15]), and the total effect on mobile phone addiction was marginally significant ( B = −0.30, SE = 0.15, t = −1.97, p = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.59, 0.00]).

The multivariant logistic regression analysis as demonstrated in Table 3 , that UC patients carrying the CC genotype have marginally significant increased odds (OR = 14.77, P = .050) of maintaining therapeutic IFX TL compared to the AA genotype, suggesting a favorable genetic influence on drug pharmacokinetics.

For mean arousal ratings, there was a marginally significant main effect of distractor category, F (1,32) = 4.17, p = 0.050, with high-calorie food stimuli being rated as significantly more arousing than neutral stimuli.