Barely Significant
← all phrases

markedly significant

413 sentences · 413 papers · 721 search hits before verification

In the literature

markedly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
In the comparison of phospho-MeCP2-S421 staining in PDR membranes with the expression of phospho-MeCP2-S421 in IEM, 32 (97%) PDR membranes were moderately to strongly stained for phospho-MeCP2-S421, whereas most of the IEM (82%) were only mildly stained, the difference was markedly significant ( supplementary Table 2 ; P < 0.001).
markedly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
While nonsignificant results were found for individuals with minimal concerns ( b = 0.08; odds ratio [OR] = 1.09, p = 0.791), markedly significant results ( p < 0.001) emerged for those expressing more concerns with b = 1.45 and OR = 4.28.
markedly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
After analyzing viral pairings using Spearman’s correlation test, it was noted that SARS-CoV-2 was negatively associated with all other respiratory viruses, whereas a markedly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001) was observed for five viral pairings (involving adenovirus/human bocavirus/human enterovirus/metapneumoviruses/rhinovirus).
markedly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
Comparing the two re-normalized fractional contributions for HeLa-wt and HeLa-APL-R cells, we found that the differences in both, α A and α B , determined for HeLa-wt and HeLa-APL-R cells are markedly significant (p < 0.001), with α B ≫ α A in HeLa-wt and α A ≫ α B in HeLa-APL-R cells, suggesting that APL * -B species seem to be critical for the mechanism of action of plitidepsin, while APL * -A species seems to be more related with cell defense against APL entry into cells.
markedly significantP=0.0020.0× alphaqualified
The difference of cell proliferation indexes between cancer cells were well, moderate and poorly differentiated, and was markedly significant (χ 2 =26.334, P=0.002), and suggested that liver cancer cell proliferation was positively correlated with GPC3 expression (r=0.316, P=0.001).
markedly significantP = 0.0030.1× alphaqualified
Fifteen patients (P = 0.02); for patients with intestinal involvement, only I only RT, one only surgery: stage and the presence of MHI were significant (P = 0.001 d CT either as initial treat- and 0.006 respectively). ment (eight CHOP, four RT + COP) or as salvage therapy (one COP), and 12 were receiving CT at time of death (five CHOP, one BEAM, one COP, 2RT + COP, one Chloram- bucil, two Mitoxantrone). Prognostic factors On univariate analysis the most markedly significant factors related to overall survival were stage (P = 0.003) and MALT status (P = 0.004), with localised stage and evidence of tumour origin from MALT being associated with relatively high survival.