From a total of 120 patients, 64 (53.3%) were hypertensive, 39 (32.5%) had a positive family history and consequently they were markedly significant from selected control (neither hypertensive nor had a negative family history) ( P <0.001) and proving the risk for occurrence of MI.
← all phrases
“markedly significant”
In the literature
Monoacylglycerols were the only lipid class displaying a markedly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in CSF of MA patients as compared to CTRL subjects.
In the comparison of phospho-MeCP2-S421 staining in PDR membranes with the expression of phospho-MeCP2-S421 in IEM, 32 (97%) PDR membranes were moderately to strongly stained for phospho-MeCP2-S421, whereas most of the IEM (82%) were only mildly stained, the difference was markedly significant ( supplementary Table 2 ; P < 0.001).
While nonsignificant results were found for individuals with minimal concerns ( b = 0.08; odds ratio [OR] = 1.09, p = 0.791), markedly significant results ( p < 0.001) emerged for those expressing more concerns with b = 1.45 and OR = 4.28.
After analyzing viral pairings using Spearman’s correlation test, it was noted that SARS-CoV-2 was negatively associated with all other respiratory viruses, whereas a markedly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001) was observed for five viral pairings (involving adenovirus/human bocavirus/human enterovirus/metapneumoviruses/rhinovirus).
With regards to the average number of secretory granules of submandibular serous acini cells, there was a markedly significant decrease (p < 0.001) in the high-fat diet group (7 ± 2.3) compared to the untreated group (95 ± 4.6).
Sincerely, between two subgroups, there were markedly significant differences of BCRFS among training cohort ( p < 0.001), testing cohort ( p = 0.008), and validating cohort ( p < 0.001).
High-risk tumor depths (≥4 mm) demonstrated a markedly significant negative dependence on both phosphorylated SMAD2 (C.C −0.214; p = 0.001) and SMAD3 (C.C −0.200; p = 0.002), which is consistent with a tumor-suppressive role for SMAD2/3 activators in cSCC [ 41 ].
Comparing the two re-normalized fractional contributions for HeLa-wt and HeLa-APL-R cells, we found that the differences in both, α A and α B , determined for HeLa-wt and HeLa-APL-R cells are markedly significant (p < 0.001), with α B ≫ α A in HeLa-wt and α A ≫ α B in HeLa-APL-R cells, suggesting that APL * -B species seem to be critical for the mechanism of action of plitidepsin, while APL * -A species seems to be more related with cell defense against APL entry into cells.
The effect of group was markedly significant ( p < .001, η 2 = .087), but not the influence of CSF Abeta abnormality.
When comparing the surgical degenerate cohort to the healthy samples, which showed an average 50% cell immunopositivity, a markedly significant difference was observed ( P ≤ 0.001) (data not shown).
Indeed, our flow cytometric analysis uncovered apoptosis induction upon Y 2 O 3 -NPs as manifested by the markedly significant ( P < 0.001) increase in early and late apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 5 A).
Furthermore, patients with abnormal levels of ≤2 metals showed a markedly significant ( p < 0.001) difference in overall survival outcomes compared to patients with abnormal levels of >3 metals (median survival: 41.72 vs. 19.13 months; Figure 4B ).
MDA, a primary indicator of lipid peroxidation, showed a markedly significant increase in gill tissue (5.43 ± 1.86 nmol/mg) compared to muscle tissue (4.07 ± 1.63 nmol/mg) ( p < 0.001).
The main effect of groups was markedly significant ( F (1,59) = 25.57, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.30, power = 0.99) while that of test time was only marginally significant ( F (2,118) = 2.88, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.05, power = 0.55).
The HER2-low group demonstrated superior outcomes for DFS ( p = 0.0130), DMFS ( p = 0.0300), OS ( p = 0.0120), and particularly for BCSS, which showed a markedly significant difference ( p = 0.0019) ( Figure 4 ). 3.3.
7 ), following l -dopa KD now showed a markedly significant preference for the RS, apparent within the first epoch of forty trials (RS 211 msec vs US 238 msec; p = .002).
The difference of cell proliferation indexes between cancer cells were well, moderate and poorly differentiated, and was markedly significant (χ 2 =26.334, P=0.002), and suggested that liver cancer cell proliferation was positively correlated with GPC3 expression (r=0.316, P=0.001).
Fifteen patients (P = 0.02); for patients with intestinal involvement, only I only RT, one only surgery: stage and the presence of MHI were significant (P = 0.001 d CT either as initial treat- and 0.006 respectively). ment (eight CHOP, four RT + COP) or as salvage therapy (one COP), and 12 were receiving CT at time of death (five CHOP, one BEAM, one COP, 2RT + COP, one Chloram- bucil, two Mitoxantrone). Prognostic factors On univariate analysis the most markedly significant factors related to overall survival were stage (P = 0.003) and MALT status (P = 0.004), with localised stage and evidence of tumour origin from MALT being associated with relatively high survival.
After controlling the effect of age and sex, the decrease of corneal sensitivity was markedly significant ( P = 0.003) as decreased corneal sensitivity was more pronounced at higher ages and in female gender.
near-significantgold
In primary rat liver hepatocytes, MPEP dose-dependently reduced ATP concentration, producing a near-significant effect at 3 μM and a markedly significant effect at 30 μM ( p = 0.003).
This association was markedly significant among patients who achieved both CR V and CR H (95% vs 61%, p = 0.004), and it was observed that induction therapy aimed at reducing VEGF levels has the potential to decrease the risk associated with autologous transplantation.
In both situations, the differences are markedly significant (obesity p < 0.005 and gender p = 0.062).
However, there was a markedly significant correlation between age and TE concentration (CC 0.324, p = 0.005) via Pearson Product Moment Correlation. 3.3.
The analysis of covariance also demonstrated a markedly significant difference ( F = 8.18, p = 0.0051) in these scores of affective status.