Barely Significant
← all phrases

moderately significant

2,106 sentences · 2,106 papers · 2,548 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

P<0.11

Reported by Matthew Hankins, whose collection is the reason this phrase is on the list.

In the literature

moderately significantp < .000a p-value is never exactly 0gold
Effects of VNS on behavioral responses (detection thresholds and intensity of perception) Changes in skin temperature showed a weakly significant positive correlation to changes in heat-sensitive C-fibers detection threshold (p < .000, R 2 = 0.135), a moderately significant positive correlation with the detection threshold of cool-sensitive free nerve endings (p < .000, R 2 = 0.545), and a weakly significant negative correlation with mechano-sensitive Aβ-fiber detection threshold (p < .000, R 2 = 0.163).
moderately significantp < 0.000a p-value is never exactly 0gold
[ 45 ], in the meta-analysis based on 26 RCTs (2652 women), showed a moderately significant effect of isoflavones on bone loss in estrogen-deficient women (WMD (g/cm 2 ) in LS 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.02), p < 0.000 and in TH 0.001 (95%: CI 0.00, 0.02), p < 0.01).
moderately significantp < 0.000010.0× alphagold
Recently, a meta-analysis study of our group examined the effect size of depressive symptom in 1,159 schizophrenic patients, which showed that patients showed moderately significant effects in favor of mind-body exercise intervention to improve depression (SMD = 0.88; 95% CI 0.63–1.13; p < 0.00001) [ 24 ]. 2.2.
moderately significantp < 1 × 10 −50.0× alphagold
The next 2 genes (low density lipoprotein receptor ( LDLR ) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 ( TIMP1 ) showed moderately significant upregulation (p < 1 × 10 −5 ) in gene expression between D20+ TGF-β and D20 samples, as detected by RNASeq analysis and a significant upregulation at D20+ TGF-β vs D20 by real-time PCR (Fig. 4H,I ).
moderately significantP = 0.00010.0× alphagold
One study reported a significant difference (MD: 25; 95% CI: 18.16–31.83; P = 0.0001), 27 , 30 and another found a moderately significant benefit (MD: 10.2; 95% CI: 5.91–14.48; P = 0.0001). 27 , 30 Two studies showed no significant differences ( P = 0.1622 and P = 0.2223, respectively). 26 , 36 Physical Well-being of the Chest The results were heterogeneous.