Barely Significant
← all phrases

moderately significant

2,183 sentences · 2,183 papers · 2,548 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

P<0.11p>0.11

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

moderately significantP = 0.0521.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This reduction was significant for body weight and wing area (ANOVA, P < 0.007 for both comparisons) and moderately significant for wing length (ANOVA, P = 0.052), corresponding to a moderate (wing length η 2 p = 0.0315) or medium-sized (body weight η 2 p = 0.069, wing area η 2 p = 0.061) effect of the variants at positions 1174 and 1063 on these 3 traits in this population ( Table 3 ).
moderately significantP = 0.0531.1× alphaqualifiedgold
As hypothesized, the EBF1 gene-by-stress interaction association in JHS females was significant for full stress summary score ( P = 0.022), for the additional stress component “racism/discrimination” ( P = 0.036), and moderately significant for differently evaluated financial strains component “not meeting basic needs” ( P = 0.053).
moderately significantp = 0.0581.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Poincaré Plot and DFA There were significant effects for SD1 (F3, 34 = 3.15, p = 0.037, ŋp2 = 0.22, op = 0.68), α1 (F3, 34 = 3.76, p = 0.020, ŋp2 = 0.25, op = 0.76), and α1/ α2 (F3, 34 = 3.73, p = 0.020, ŋp2 = 0.25, op = 0.76), and a moderately significant effect for SD1/SD2 (F3, 34 = 2.75, p = 0.058, ŋp2 = 0.20, op = 0.61).
moderately significantP = 0.0581.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The abundance of both proteins was higher in jejunum, with the difference considered significant for cadherin-17 (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.03) and moderately significant for Na + /K + -ATPase (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.058). mRNA expression relative to the reference gene GAPDH was determined for all transporters with the exception of SLCO1A2 (OATP1A2) and ATP1A1 (Na + /K + -ATPase).
moderately significantp = 0.0591.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Snails The two-way MANOVA on snail abundance and mass, assessed on day 68, revealed effects of Elodea (Wilks’ F 6,70 = 2.1, p = 0.026) and moderately significant effects of the Elodea- by-insecticide treatment interaction (Wilks’ λ, F 12,70 = 1.6, p = 0.059), but not insecticides (Wilks’ F 4,70 = 1.7, p = 0.111).
moderately significantp = .0591.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Isomorphic testing (research question 2) The ANCOVA on isomorphic declarative clinical knowledge quiz score revealed a moderately significant difference between groups, F (1,58) = 3.70, p = .059, η p 2 = .060, BF 10 = 1.16, observed power = .92 ( Fässler, 2022c ).
moderately significantp-value=0.061.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Results: We report significantly increased infiltration of macrophages (mean macrophages= 306.57/mm 2 , p-value <0.05), moderately significant infiltration of neutrophils (p-value=0.06) and B-cells (p-value=0.07) while no significant infiltration of CD4+T-cells (p- value=0.31), and CD8+T-cells (p-value=0.39) in tumour microenvironment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
moderately significantp-value=0.061.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Results: We report significantly increased infiltration of macrophages (mean macrophages= 306.57/mm2, p-value<0.05), moderately significant infiltration of neutrophils (p-value=0.06) and B-cells (p-value=0.07) while no significant infiltration of CD4+ T-cells (p- value=0.31), and CD8+ T-cells (p-value=0.39) in tumour microenvironment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma Conclusion: Our data describe tumour densities of myeloid and innate lymphoid cells in well characterized human samples of hepatocellular carcinoma.
moderately significantP <.061.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Although the effects were only moderately significant ( P <.06), we found that an increase by one point in neuroticism and agreeableness scales increases the likelihood of choosing address interventions, which were designed to help users directly address resolve the stress-inducing components of their lives.
moderately significantp < 0.061.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The subjective significance effect reflected the fact that the response latency was longer for moderately significant stimuli than for highly significant stimuli [ t (31) = 2.11, p < 0.06], and minimally significant stimuli, [ t (31) = 2.20, p < 0.06].