Barely Significant
← all phrases

near-significant

1,564 sentences · 1,564 papers · 5,323 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

near-significantp = 0.0611.2× alphagold
right) showed a significant association with CoP medial–lateral range on the uninjured side (β = 12.996, p = 0.009) and a near-significant influence on CoP range in the injured limb ( p = 0.061), as well as total excursion difference ( p = 0.067), pointing to subtle asymmetries potentially introduced by laterality of injury.
near-significantp = 0.0611.2× alphagold
36 , 37 The VdsA2-P2B peptide has the same ring structure and dehydration state as VdsA2-P2A; however, it is not bound to the GSH modification. Similar to the VdsA2-P2A peptide, the VdsA2-P2B peptide induced a statistically near-significant, one-way ANOVA p = 0.061 and Levene’s test p = 0.012 ( Figure S15B ) stimulatory effect on larval locomotion during the basal state after 1 h exposure ( Table 2 ; Figures S15–S18 ).
near-significantp = 0.0611.2× alphagold
Results in Supplementary Figure S3 show its expression is dynamically regulated (Log2 fold change: −1.5 to 1.5), with notable trends: near-significant upregulation under BDQ ( p = 0.061), downward trend under INH, and changes under starvation, aligning with its roles in related pathways (The results of the multi-transcriptome analysis of Rv1846c were obtained from www.clipme.top:11725/ , accessed on 2 March 2022).
near-significantp = 0.0611.2× alphagold
However, we found no evidence to support this: there was only one near-significant correlation between change in azimuth angle and change in x error during leftwards movement condition ( p = 0.061, Bonferroni adjusted); this is not the axis in which changes in azimuth angle would be most prominent, given the near-vertical plane of movements ( Figure 1 ).
near-significantp = 0.0621.2× alphagold
No significant differences were found between dropouts and participants on any baseline variables ( p > 0.302), except a near-significant difference in time since whiplash (dropouts: 14.5 months, SD 3.1; participants: 26.8 months, SD 14.5; p = 0.062).
near-significantp = 0.0631.3× alphagold
The linear regressions to test whether spraint densities are good indicators for otter densities revealed a near-significant relationship between yearly spraint densities (numbers of genotyped samples per ha) and yearly numbers of distinct genotypes per ha (R 2 = 0.62, df = 4, p = 0.063, Fig 3 ), whereas there was no relationship between yearly spraint densities and yearly estimated individuals per ha (R 2 = 0.24, df = 4, p = 0.33, Fig 3 ).