Barely Significant
← all phrases

near-significant

1,670 sentences · 1,670 papers · 5,323 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

near-significantP = 0.0691.4× alphagold
Similarly, DASH lowered DBP to a near-significant degree at week one (−5.95 ± 8.01 mmHg, CI : −11.02, −0.88, P = 0.069) as compared to the baseline, with statistically significant reduction at week two (−8.60 ± 9.13 mmHg, CI : −14.38, −2.82, P = 0.011).
near-significantp = .0691.4× alphagold
In addition, self-reported connectedness had a small positive correlation with beta-endorphin, accounting for 6% of the variation (B = 2.991, SEM = 1.107, t (134) = 2.703, p = .008) and a near-significant correlation with oxytocin, accounting for 4% of the variation (B = 1.422, SEM = 0.773, t (103) = 1.840, p = .069).
near-significantp = .071.4× alphagold
11 Recently, Qurashi and colleagues 12 conducted a trial in Pakistan, where 326 participants, aged between 16-35 years, were treated for 6 months with omega-3 PUFAs only, omega-3 PUFAs plus minocycline, minocycline only or placebo, followed by a 6-month observation period; the subjects treated with omega-3 PUFAs (with or without minocycline) had near-significant higher transition rate ( p = .07) compared to subjects not treated with omega-3 PUFAs.
near-significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
In descriptive terms, there was a trend toward a higher number of errors after the tES stimulation sessions (see Table 2 ), as underlined by a near-significant main effect of Time of measurement in the corresponding RM-ANOVA model ( p = 0.07, η p 2 = 139; see Table 3 ).
near-significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Extinction A 2 × 3 × 2 rmANOVA using Context (CTX+, CTX−), Trial (start, middle, end) as within-group variables and Group (novel exploration, control) as a between-group variable showed an effect of Trial, F(1.47,77.63) = 9.45, p < 0.001 G-G corrected, η 2 = 0.15 and a near-significant effect of Context, F(1,53) = 3.51, p = 0.07.
near-significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Main effects of emotional valence According to the pre-registered statistical analysis plan, we first examined the main effect of emotional valence on our dependent measures using ANOVAs with emotional valence (positive, neutral, negative) as independent variable: Skin conductance The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a near-significant main effect of emotional valence, F(2,104) = 2.80, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.05 ( Fig 2A , S2 – S4 Tables).
near-significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Latency to Disengage First Gaze away from Aggressive Faces is Faster following the Health Check GLMM performed on the mean latency to disengage gaze from aggressive and neutral faces revealed a significant main effect of testing condition ( F 1,54 = 7.07, p = 0.01) and a near-significant interaction of face x condition ( F 1,54 = 3.41, p = 0.07: Figure 2B ).