Barely Significant
← all phrases

nearly significant

3,280 sentences · 3,280 papers · 3,797 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
[ 20 ], in a 6-week trial, found no between group differences for change in absolute EI assessed by (24-hour diet record) in a sample of women randomized to morning ( n = 25) or evening ( n = 23) exercise, although the difference was nearly significant ( p = 0.06) with morning exercisers reducing EI by ~ 350 kcal/day and evening exercisers reducing EI ~ 30 kcal/day.
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Surprisingly, γ-tocopherol, a form of vitamin E, was highly significantly and positively associated with T2D (final adjusted OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3–1.7; p<0.001) in two cohorts (adjusted OR of 1.8 and 1.6; p = 0.02 and 0.01 for 1999–2000 and 2001–2002 cohorts) and nearly significant in the two others (adjusted OR of 1.3 and 1.6; p = 0.06 and 0.04 for 2001–2002 and 2005–2006 cohorts).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
We excluded one participant as an outlier (with PPI = 5.62, VAS‐before = 86, VAS‐after = 95), however, the Pearson correlation results remained nearly significant (R = 0.24, p = 0.06). 4 DISCUSSION Here, we explained how structural and functional MRI can be used to design an experiment and target a VMPFC‐amygdala circuit in people with SUD (Figure 1 ).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
As shown in Table 2 , the mild hyponatremia group also had more cases of sarcopenia, weaker GS, slower WS, shorter OLS time, and higher GDS-15 score. ANCOVA showed that mild hyponatremia had a significant effect on SMI ( F [1, 2393) = 4.2; p = 0.04), GS ( F [1, 1951] = 6.6; p = 0.01), WS ( F [1, 672] = 11.9; p = 0.001), and GDS-15 score ( F [1, 2883] = 9.7; p = 0.002) after controlling for covariates, and a nearly significant effect on OLS time ( F [1, 2527] = 3.6; p = 0.06) (Table 3 ).
nearly significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
For BDNF there was a main effect of gender such that women were found to demonstrate higher levels of plasma BDNF than men ( F (1,30) = 6.88, p < 0.05) and there was a nearly significant gender × pre-post interaction ( p = 0.06) indicating a tendency for women to show greater relative increases in BDNF over the course of the retreat.