Barely Significant
← all phrases

nearly significant

3,280 sentences · 3,280 papers · 3,797 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
The only exceptions were SNAC1 and PR1#74 , which showed significant or nearly significant impacts of time, treatment, and their interaction ( SNAC1 , ANOVA: time, P = 0.07, Cohen’s f = 0.471; treatment, P = 0.05, Cohen’s f = 0.76; time x treatment, P = 0.07, Cohen’s f = 0.72; PR1#74 , ANOVA: time × treatment, P = 0.07, Cohen’s f = 0.73).
nearly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
On the contrary, among 157 patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy (a heterogeneous group of node-positive and/or pT4 and/or radically resected liver metastases patients; i.e., high-risk stage II patients and stage ≥ III cancers), MSS patients showed significantly better DFS rates (HR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.14–0.89; p = 0.005) and nearly significant OS rates (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.20–1.29; p = 0.07) than MSI patients, thus demonstrating that MSI tumors in advanced stages, requiring adjuvant therapy, are significantly disadvantaged or even harmed with conventional chemotherapy schedules ( Figure 2 and Figure 3 ). 3.2.
nearly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Articulation The post-hoc Bonferroni test showed nearly significant differences in articulation between correlation means for (R affective 1/2) and (R cognitive 1/R affective 1) at p = 0.07, but did not indicate significant differences either between (R cognitive 1/2) and (R cognitive 1/R affective 1) or between (R cognitive 1/2) and (R affective 1/2).
nearly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
Comparing the range of values across classes revealed the modest nature of these enrichments ( Fig 5 ), with mostly GFP+ and mostly GFP- clones having a significant difference in original clone abundance (p = 0.044, Mann Whitney U 2-sided test) and a nearly significant difference in distance to H3K9me3 peaks (p = 0.07, Mann Whitney U 2-sided test), while the distance to H3K9me3 peaks was significantly different between the GFP+ and ‘mixed’ classes (p = 0.004, Mann Whitney U 2-sided test).
nearly significantP = 0.071.4× alphagold
We removed non-significant effects in a stepwise procedure, arriving at final model that included nearly significant effects of SC trial type (F 1,30 = 3.5, P = 0.07) and SC allopatric male display rate (F 1, 30 = 2.9, P = 0.10) and a significant effect of SC sympatric male display rate (F 1, 30 = 5.4, P = 0.03).
nearly significantp = .071.4× alphagold
Pairwise comparisons indicate a significant difference between treatments in Willow Warblers (two‐sample t ‐test, t 24 = −6.08, p < .001) and nearly significant in Lesser Whitethroats (t 8 = −2.05, p = .07), but not significant in the other species (Common Chiffchaff: t 8 = −0.84, p = 0.42; European Robin: t 14 = −1.37, p = .19; Blue Tit: t 10 = −0.71, p = .49). 4.
nearly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
The main effect of reference was nearly significant in the subjects analysis, F 1(1, 64) = 3.38, p = 0.07, η 2 p = 0.05, but non-significant in the items analysis, F 2(1, 29) = 2.32, p = 0.14, and the interaction between reference and nouns was not significant, F 1(1, 64) = 0.65, p = 0.42, F 2(1, 29) = 1.09, p = 0.31.
nearly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
However, when causative mutations were grouped by the involved exon of MYH9 , mutations of exon 25 (T1155I, T1155A, and R1162T) were associated with a higher prevalence of elevation of both aminotrasferases (p = 0.04) and with a higher level of increase of ALT (p = 0.02); a nearly significant association was observed also for a higher elevation of AST (p = 0.07).
nearly significantP < 0.071.4× alphagold
The CD14+ TNF-α+ population was significantly increased ( P < 0.04) when patients received the vaccine; IL-2 expression in both NK cells and in B lymphocytes was increased after a transient initial increase showed a nearly significant decrease ( P < 0.07 and P < 0.06 respectively), whereas the CD19+ and CD56+ populations did not show significant changes.