Barely Significant
← all phrases

nominally significant

4,768 sentences · 4,768 papers · 9,414 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
Simple t -tests contrasting the trait values of those recombinants subjected to WGS- or MSG-based genotyping were not significant in most cases ( p > 0.1 for lobe area, height, width, height-to-width ratio, PC2, and PC3), and only nominally significant in one case that does not survive correction for multiple testing ( p = 0.045 for PC1).
nominally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
For ΔDSL, the interaction term was nominally significant (β = −0.605, 95% CI −1.198 to −0.012; p = 0.046); because this analysis was exploratory and the study was not powered for interaction testing, this finding was interpreted cautiously and not taken as evidence of a confirmed modifying effect.
nominally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Subsequently, we used a t ‐test to compare the ME between AD+P and AD−P samples, identifying six nominally significant modules (darkgreen: N = 1023 probes, p = 0.046; firebrick4: N = 122 probes, p = 0.025; darkseagreen3: N = 105 probes, p = .012; magenta: N = 6368 probes, p = 0.030; grey60: N = 1830, p = 0.018; greenyellow: N = 5512 probes, p = 0.045).
nominally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
3.5 Sleep disturbance score and rate of brain Aβ accumulation After Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, a nominally significant three‐way interaction was observed among moderate/severe sleep disturbance, APOE ε4 carriage, and time (β = 2.35 ± 1.17, P = 0.046), with respect to rate of brain Aβ accumulation.
nominally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
The GGN microsatellite in exon 1 of the AR gene showed modest nominally significant associations between a dichotomous (homozygous major allele GGN 23 carried by 70% of individuals vs rest) measure and two outcomes: child IQ (r = −0.104, p = 0.046) and anxiety symptoms (r = 0.096, p = 0.040).
nominally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
In the fully adjusted model including Total WMH and CMC, standardized β coefficients were −0.005 (95% CI, −0.064 to 0.054; p = 0.87) for reaction time, −0.007 (95% CI, −0.065 to 0.052; p = 0.82) for Trail Making Test–B, −0.058 (95% CI, −0.116 to −0.001; p = 0.046, nominally significant) for fluid intelligence, and −0.019 (95% CI, −0.110 to 0.072; p = 0.68) for digit span.