“only marginally significant”

Upon examination of the locality level, the increase observed with Wm traps was significant for all (BOU, CYA, CAR, GRM and KAR; all p < 0.037, S1 Table ) but two localities (GAM and WAD, the latter showing only marginally significant increase, p = 0.053, S1 Table ).

For upright houses, the Similarity × Age interaction was significant, F (4,118) = 9.0, p = 0.0001, but the simple effect of similarity was only marginally significant for older children ( p = 0.053, no linear trend) and not significant for adults or younger children.

The incidence of shock was higher in patients with index values ≥0.8, although this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

After adjusting for our pre-defined covariates, the main effect of user-group became only marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

While this difference was only marginally significant, t(37) = 2.00, p = .053, it suggests that target present detection times influence the quitting threshold.

That is, when the system-level policy was planned (ex ante), inducing a loss frame had a small and only marginally significant effect on reactance compared to the control condition ( F (1, 1631) = 3.76, P = 0.053, d = 0.14, 95% CI [0.00, 0.27]).

Among boys/men, higher stress was associated with lower right amygdala activation for the EBV measure, although the effect was only marginally significant for EBV ( t (292) = 1.94, p = 0.053, 0.161) and not significant for microbial diversity ( t (292) = −1.41, p = 0.158, 0.117). 3.2.

There was weak indication that with more eggs per area the level of hydration increased, but results were only marginally significant ( Table 1 ; 95% CI = [-19.90; 0.079], p = 0.053).

Note that division into 14 bins resulted in the lowest correlation (r s = 0.52), which was only marginally significant (p=0.053).

We find a small and only marginally significant effect of the treatment on participants’ perception that wearing a mask indoors makes a person look like a Biden supporter ( d = 0.12 ; t ( 1 , 085 ) = 1.93 , P = 0.053 ); see Fig. 4 b.

Egger’s test revealed that publication bias was only marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

The prevalence of sensitization to inhalant allergens was higher in rural than in urban younger children, but the difference was only marginally significant (1–4 years old, P = 0.053).

Specifically, the effect size was significant for immediate JOLs ( g = .40, p < .001), but it was reduced and only marginally significant for delayed JOLs ( g = .18, p = .053).

3e,f ), although the difference in accessibility in response to light was only marginally significant in the rice mesophyll ( P = 0.053).

When removing scores for these three sentence pairs from the dataset, the t -test becomes only marginally significant (one word: M = 22.03, SD = 83.39, two word: M = 77.60, SD = 133.28, comparison: t = 2.007, p = 0.053).

NH 4 + immobilization ranged from 0 to 3.74 mg N kg −1 d −1 (with an average of 1.8 mg N kg −1 d −1 ) in southern soils and from 0 to 2.58 mg N kg −1 d −1 (with an average of 0.59 mg N kg −1 d −1 ) in northern soils, but the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.053).

The mixed-effects model that best fit the data had separate group means but a common diurnal slope (because the group difference in slope values was only marginally significant, p = .053).

2e ), though only marginally significant changes were observed at day 4 ( P = 0.0531 for LOAC and P = 0.086 for LOHC) and day 8 ( P = 0.0552, 0.0932).

While the odds of clinical pharmacy utilization among adults who lived in higher poverty counties were 50% (CI: 0.24‐1.01) lower than those for adults who lived in lower poverty counties, the association was only marginally significant ( P = .0535).

The association between a closed outcome and the number of deliveries was only marginally significant (logistic Wald odds ratio estimate 1.072, 95% CI 0.999–1.150, p < 0.0536).

When comparing PPI differences in male NPSR1 WT and KO mice, C57Bl/6J mice exhibited a very significant difference between WT and NPSR1 KO groups (F(1, 104) = 27.28, p < 0.0001), whereas 129S6/SvEvTac mice displayed only marginally significant differences between genotypes (F(1, 40) = 3.95, p = 0.0537).

For computer self-efficacy, the same trend emerged amongst the employment status categories but was only marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

Branch WD showed a similar trend, though it was weaker and only marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.09, P = 0.054; see Supporting Information—Table S5 ).

For the negative traits POs were lower for ingroup than outgroup, but the difference was only marginally significant ( t = 2.55, p = .054, Cohen’s d = 0.25).

Laterality Hypothesis 2a—No difference in hand use frequency Across all experimental phases right-handed sFST (n = 164) were performed more often than left- handed sFST (n = 130) but the difference was only marginally significant (Binomial Test: p = .054; Table 3 ).