“only marginally significant”

At day 0, DHF patients tended to associate with higher median antibody titers (median: 4.522, IQR: 1–160.1) compared with DF patients (median: 0, IQR: 1–19.32), although the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.0525) (Fig. 3 d).

Linear estimates of latitudinal clines Latitudinal clines in body size ranged from slightly—though insignificantly—positive in Apodemia mormo and Feniseca tarquinius to strongly and significantly negative for all Eumaeini (Table 2 ), with the exception of Satrium edwardsii , which was only marginally significant ( p = .0525).

This behavior is in full agreement with the ANOVA results: B demonstrates extremely high significance ( p = 0.000053), while A is only marginally significant ( p = 0.0526).

The number of thrips found on heather at site 1 was higher than the other sites, but only marginally significant (Kruskal–Wallis; X 2 = 7.698, df = 3, p = 0.053, Figure 5 ). 2.5.

Hyperlipoproteinemia was less frequently observed in patients with symptomatic TMJ-IDs (25%) than in the control group (46.5%), ( p = 0.0116, Yates’ correction; p = 0.0054, Fisher’s exact test), while in those with asymptomatic TMJ-IDs (44%) it was significantly lower using Fisher’s exact test ( p = 0.0266), but this was only marginally significant ( p = 0.0530) according to Yates’ correction.

Moderate to severe stress was only marginally significant (aOR=1.61, p -value = 0.053).

= .38, Wald Z = 5.29, p <.001) and 1.5 times higher in the related than in the unrelated condition, although this effect was only marginally significant ( β = .40, S.E. = .21, Wald Z = 1.94, p = .053).

Although aphid mortality was higher at 25 °C compared to 15 °C, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

A main effect was found for MMSE score and the interaction with twin status was only marginally significant (GLM interaction term zygosity status × MMSE score: z = 1.933 p < 0.053).

In the m32 dataset, the first RDA axis explained 38.59% of the constrained variation and was statistically significant, whereas the second axis explained 27.89% but was only marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

For upright houses, the Similarity × Age interaction was significant, F (4,118) = 9.0, p = 0.0001, but the simple effect of similarity was only marginally significant for older children ( p = 0.053, no linear trend) and not significant for adults or younger children.

The inverse relationship also existed for plants with different leaf habits ( r 2 = 0.14, 0.25, and 0.30, and p < 0.0001, 0.0001, and 0.05 for DB, EB and conifer, respectively; Figure 1b-d ), although it was only marginally significant for N-fixers ( r 2 = 0.20; p = 0.053; Figure 1d ).

While epi-type was identified as a significant main effect ( Table 4 ), the RREMM was higher for the strains representing NHA SNP clusters (0.05) than HA SNP clusters (0.04) and the post hoc t test suggested that this difference in invasion efficiency was only marginally significant ( P = 0.053) ( Fig. 4A ).

Small holes (<5 cm) had an importance value of 0.7, a positive direction (0.05) but was only marginally significant ( P = 0.053).

3b , P = 0.005); however, this correlation was only marginally significant for the total neighbourhood (rA+rB; Fig. 3c , P = 0.053).

First, the RT semantic priming effect in the short SOA in Experiment 1 is only marginally significant (t(31) = -2.01, p = 0.053) in the simulated data.

After adjusting for age, gender, race and mini-mental state examination scores, the odds ratio was only marginally significant (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.01, p = 0.053).

Specifically, the effect size was significant for immediate JOLs ( g = .40, p < .001), but it was reduced and only marginally significant for delayed JOLs ( g = .18, p = .053).

While this difference was only marginally significant, t(37) = 2.00, p = .053, it suggests that target present detection times influence the quitting threshold.

Although we found that adjuvant chemotherapy tended to increase patient survival in p-stage I NSCLC patients with poorly differentiated tumors, this survival benefit was only marginally significant ( P = 0.053).

The incidence of shock was higher in patients with index values ≥0.8, although this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.053).

NH 4 + immobilization ranged from 0 to 3.74 mg N kg −1 d −1 (with an average of 1.8 mg N kg −1 d −1 ) in southern soils and from 0 to 2.58 mg N kg −1 d −1 (with an average of 0.59 mg N kg −1 d −1 ) in northern soils, but the difference was only marginally significant (p = 0.053).

Also, in problematic gamblers risky bets ratio after a Near-miss (M = .699, SE = .091) was significantly higher than after a Loss (M = .611, SE = .088, p <.009), and higher than after a Win (M = .580, SE = .089) but such a difference was only marginally significant (p = .053) ( Figure 3 ).

Note that division into 14 bins resulted in the lowest correlation (r s = 0.52), which was only marginally significant (p=0.053).

Upon examination of the locality level, the increase observed with Wm traps was significant for all (BOU, CYA, CAR, GRM and KAR; all p < 0.037, S1 Table ) but two localities (GAM and WAD, the latter showing only marginally significant increase, p = 0.053, S1 Table ).